"People's Government"

People's Government:

The IMF does not give Ukraine the money promised, that Kiev is not to change the law, as he had promised.
IMF correctly explains this connection officials with the oligarchs and corruption.
Te IMF is actually helping the actual euro-integration.
Poor (not literally) state apparatus already been between a rock (the people) and a hard place (hosts):
Either people lyustriruet or leave home without a job - in the best case.
The people "meet" easier - to insert into the Constitution loud populist, but broken sentences - because the devil is in the details - in-laws, which, in fact, do not be. But the people did not understand these subtleties.
But then the people came competent ally - the IMF.
However, with the IMF is always "understood" - set up the people against him. - - They say, the IMF needs to take away money from the people.
Guilty as freedom of speech appeared, razyasniteli, and Europe again.
Ended is usually another dictatorship.
However, the IMF - a potential ally, as long as it will not communicate the Cabinet.

The Ukrainian people still want to become a European nation.
But the difference between - the European people?
- The competent institutions of civil society that interact with the state apparatus.
And not only requires himself does not know why.
Intuitively crowd certainly felt. But to formulate a law consistent, but still can not be effective.
- It supposedly has "professionals" - state apparatus.
The catch, only that the interests of these "professionals" opposed to the interests of the crowd.
The European institutions - 200 years in the fight were born.
Ukraine is 100 years has been outside of Europe, and even degenerated into totalitarianism.
And now the crowd wants to jump instantly to Europe from "feudalism».

It always has been. Still.
But now there is a new fact that radically alters the terms - Internet:
In Europe, the next generation is born people interact with institutions of the state apparatus - Direct, open, Internet-Democracy:
Internet makes it possible not only to control the state apparatus, but to carry out more and more of its functions.

Demand something from "professional" cheater - self-harm,
Protests only exacerbate the situation.
Build a parallel government in Ukraine is also not optimal:
1. The authorities have come to the dialogue,
2. In a 2-Power is degenerate.

It is necessary to build a "support group" of the President, with 100% freedom of information (not to be confused with freedom of speech):
1. Internet-office network - productive, scientific:
Available poses problems,
Are they the best solutions - in a free, organized, but not controlled discussion.
20 years suggest this - factorial mechanism.
2. Horizontal - is not hierarchical, in the sense - no subordination.
But the credibility of the ratings for a variety of properties - affects the weight of opinion.

To get started, simply monitor the activities of the unit at each stage.
Later on the state apparatus will need only statistics, but not the solution.
Decisions will be generated automatically at 0-th subjectivism.
This is democracy.
Western "democracy" - far from that.
0th subjectivity - is the 0th power, the 0th corruption,
100% efficiency since optimal.

The problem - to submit an idea - in 1990, I sent 3 stages "self-organization consultative structures" - 10 Cams addresses activists USSR.
But responding - units. And even they did not understand the idea.
Can you help? - I am sure the people of Ukraine is extremely necessary.

I think you bring benefits more than a battalion of submachine if we can start in Ukraine such as Collaborative e-democracy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_e-democracy

It is necessary to look for enemies, especially not in Russia, in Kiev, and even in the "power elite" and a:

It is now necessary to work through the Open Government
Ukraine is already participating in the 2nd Action Plan Cycle
However, it is not audible to the activists used these opportunities.

It is necessary, at least, to create, to develop Ukrainian counterparts Wiki- page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_e-democracy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-democracy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_deliberation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_collaboration
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-rulemaking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-participation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deliberative_democracy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_intelligence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-government
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_efficacy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_Elite
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behemoth:_The_Structure_and_Practice_of_National_Socialism

for example, the meaning of Korporatokratіya in:
https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Корпоратократія
distorted: speaking about the organization - instead of oligarchs. -
- Groups with common interests
- "Power elite»
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatocracy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Elite