eng deu рус

Questions anarchism:

Ask anyone: "What is anarchy" - said: "It's a mess, chaos, disorganization."
Although H Makhno wrote that anarchy - this is the order, "organization" and "constructive".
�
The principles of anarchy:
1. Lack of power.
2. Freedom from coercion.
3. Freedom of association.
4. Mutual.
5. Variety.
6. Equality.
7. Brotherhood and sisterhood.
(Ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/��������)
- Divine principles.
�
These principles involve extremely high-organization
And that has become synonymous with anarchy "anarchy" - wines, first of all, the anarchists themselves.
�
This anarchy is 100% real, moreover, can be made 1 day in advance.
�

�anarchism� Experience after the collapse of the USSR:

There is a rich experience of "self" in the enterprises after the collapse of the USSR.
Perhaps this experience is the richest in history - on a variety of shapes and stories.
Somehow, this experience is hardly analyzed, first of all, the anarcho-syndicalists.
�
Example: Kuzbass:
Syndicalism was a huge head start after the strikes of miners and the collapse of the Soviet Union - the mine became independent from the state, and thus the property of work collectives.
The destruction of economic ties was not a major problem - "red" control quickly found buyers in Germany and Japan - for the currency, which is converted in the same place in the "deficit" -shirpotreb.
�
3rd problem: the anarchists have not learned to defend workers - newcomers "Toyota" massively selected bandits.
"Red" has managed to create PSCs (private security company), however:
1. Weaning values ??proved more profitable for their protection.
2. Unemployed legitimate rulers organized sabotage, colluded with racketeers.
3. Unemployed police themselves often moonlighting banditami- "werewolves".
As a result, the population voted in favor of legal plunder instead of lawlessness - in which both can kill.
�
2nd problem: the anarchists did not help workers understand the accounting, to be exact - in economics and law.
- The rulers in collusion with the "red" control privatized "national" companies exchanging shares for offshore and papers showing the work unprofitable.
�
1st problem: the anarchists did not create a consensus instruments:
There are many protocols staff meeting early 1990s, which shows a complete inability to organize themselves. - Many hours meeting ended in nothing.
�
Large companies could trade, but not organized,
Fine the same collective - could not sell, farmers engaged in subsistence farming.
�
�
Almost scenario anarchists, as a result of the general strike, the Soviet Union the means of production passed into the ownership of workers - in the form of vouchers.
However, in the end, he defeated bandits cracy, the oligarchy.
�

Raiding:

In the context of the weakness of the state hierarchy, the hierarchy of the bandit was stronger and self-government, and the "red directors�:
Administration of enterprises created CHOP (private security companies).
But CHOP-Py most were powerless:
The local crime bosses defeated PSC-s in the shooting, intimidated and bribed the territorial administration, and became the owners of the assets.
�
In practice, however, the process was more colorful:
Bandits were most - themselves CHOP-s, local security officials and administrators,
Initially, the company's administration paid a tribute to the bandits, then, went bankrupt, was not able to pay it. T o, for the bandit "concepts" assets passed into the ownership of the crime bosses.
In this case, the salary is also not paid, however, labor groups against bandits competitors were powerless.
After the capture of enterprises, bandits increased production efficiency due to the tightening of labor discipline and the strikers have tasted the freemen of the late 1980s, were simply murdered, sometimes "legally", as in Novy Uzen.
For Soviet workers the Stalinist discipline was normal and familiar. They could only work a protest than deserved contempt new - bandit aristocracy.
T o the USSR plants planned to transfer work, but because of the complete incapacity of the workers, the factories were in the hands of criminals, then legalized in the oligarchy.
Support, in particular, the Moscow regime is not the people, and - the oligarchy.
This explains the anti-popular policy in Russia.
�

Process Factors Gorbachev:

2. State policy has been - pro- oligarchic, of course:
- Voucher fraud was still in the plan,
- Plants shared in Moscow,
- Legislation to "sharpen" under its terms, under the future oligarchs,
- "Self-managed" companies were actually controlled by the administration of enterprises - "red directors".
The administration actively made out the lion's share of the assets of the enterprise.
�
Nevertheless, it appears that these were not major factors, most importantly:
1. Labor collectives have not coped with management:
There are many protocols staff meeting early 1990s, which shows a complete inability to organize themselves.
�
The workers were not going to take responsibility, they just thought, "Mills manages desks, nomenclature, will give their best to the capitalists, those, at least, the salary will be paid more." However, they miscalculated: the capitalists was not, but was highly criminals.
�

Let's syndicate (union) will capture your plant:

What he will do with it?
Profit owners plants in developed countries are now several times less than the salary fund.
In the jungle, the owners are constantly changing global market, assets are continuously "walk".
Plant fixed for his employees, will play in this respect.
To this we must add factors:
1. Such a plant will be located in a hostile legal environment. If you are capturing all the factories in one country, the game will take additional countervailing factors.
�
As a result, wages will fall on the captured plant, and workers themselves to disperse a successful capitalists.
After the collapse of the USSR was widespread exchange of vouchers for vodka.
�

In the West, meanwhile:

Classic proletariat almost eliminated.
He handed over to China, - let the Communists tame their workers.
Remains of the proletariat - bribed - via pricing, investment and other policies, the problem shifted to the "third world."
Soviet experience has shown the unreality of communism.
�
We distributed the shares - the workers that they had something to lose.
Stimulate entrepreneurship for:
1. - Suck entrepreneurial talents of the working environment,
2. - Increasing profits, it is not paradoxical. because profit is relative: In terms of the law reducing the rate of profit, profit determine the least successful enterprises.
�
Liberal Socialism:
"Proletarian Revolution" even unnatural, Marx was wrong about its inevitability. - Slaves never ruled, they only give someone power.
Trend - freedom, not restriction of property incl.
The path to social equality lies in the other direction: not to restrict freedom, and its expansion, - reducing the "friction", the elimination of the administrative component.
This is the "crowd" and it is necessary to explain and teach, not to incite.
�
�Proletarian" Plan A has failed, due to enter the "organizational" plan B:
The conclusion from the above - not that anarcho-syndicalism is no future, and that the emphasis must be shifted to the "struggle" - with protests and constructive simulation training. -
If there is something to offer - and the violence is not required. - Lucky again to God:
From now on, in terms of "democracy" the world is governed not by violence, and - propaganda.
We call libertarianism, anarchism - to protect against trolls.
Authorities Internet "swallowed the" sucked, now back will not be able to pass.
After you create the system described below, "counterbattery" propaganda of capitalism lose. The armed forces of the United States will not save capitalism.
So:
�

The measures are necessary and sufficient for the victory of anarchy:

1. deliberative, consultative structure:

Party - this organization to seize power.
The anarchist party - is nonsense.
By anarchy - only 1 way - political self-organization of the people, not direct democracy in the Swiss sense of the referenda and recall of deputies and in the sense of - direct production of all the solutions.
Internet, finally, to create a tool to achieve consensus in real time.
Democracy - "government of the people" in this case disappears, that is to "power - is to impose their will, effect on the activities and behavior of other people" and "power" over the other, a general 1-rank system of social arrangements, laws, roles and responsibilities - it is not power.
�

2. Consumer Network:

The sale of their labor wage workers can be treated as a sale of semi-finished products produced by the workers in the free provision of customer premises equipment. - 90% of workers - the piece is now.
The owner of the equipment, taking advantage of his position, underpaid seller.
However, it is now:
From the 1st part,> 50,% labor brigade sale - complex equipment, and individually, few works.
On the 2nd hand, computer networks have reduced the sales component of market imperfections to zero.
On the third hand, trading "cheat" on average, more than production cost, now.
T o Now it is advisable in the "struggle" focus on rental equipment.
�
Retail consumer computer network sales can build vertical chain between the teams working so:
1. removes, almost marketing risks. Te workers do not have to deal with
1.1. Workers do not have to engage in "non-core" business,
1.2. Eliminates the main feature of the capitalist risky - sales.
2. Make the relationship the lessor and lessee equal equipment. Take away, that is the main part of the "capitalist" profits.
3. Trade chains - to the end user. "Capitalist" falls.
More precisely, the Consumer Network is due to start by the end user.
�

3. Finely-proprietary network:

Already, 20% of working teams work on the equipment: farmers, "truckers�,
% And this is growing rapidly, primarily because of = for the same computer revolution.
�
Large enterprises - a product of capitalist relations, rather than technological factors.
Technology is now the size went to a historical decline: a chemical factory in the plant cell is not as effective as an international chemical corporation.
Solar cells - nuclear power, 3D-printers, remote workers,
Slight advantages of concentration less than its disadvantages, such as inflexibility, now.
....
"Vanguard of the working class" - freelancers now
Although the owner of his work tools are not called, but the term is not adequate.
� A small manufacturing community in governance - effective.
�� �� �� ��. �� ��
Community The classic proletarian Brigade
Mismanagement: Subconsciously wants to ruin any working equipment and lime more resources
Spiritual, even technical, the goal - combines Animosity - combines
3.2. More efficient tools of self-organization and self-management.
1st factor of - Internet and IT.
�
3.3. Operating investments:
accumulation mechanism:
� �� ��. � �� ��
19th century The worker and craftsman of income is only enough to feed,
The capitalist as profit - reinvested.
Concentrated ownership effectively.
Result: Concentration of ownership
21st Century The rate of profit declines,
Workers also have enough income for self-investment.
Gross operating investments exceeds capitalist.
Personal ownership of the web - effectively.
Result: Reverse the erosion of property, Neo-craft. Neo-community, -. Not generic and ideological

4. Intellectual property:

The "information" era, this factor becomes the master.
However, the information trying to be treated as "iron" - invent "intellectual property",
And this component of the non-market excess profits becomes the leading now.
Only one with the right restructuring prohibitive and permissive on billing for the use of able to bury capitalism.
�

5. Utopia 2.0:

Before you make a revolution, a model, after the "virtual" simulation, it is necessary to try to "iron":
Revolution - too expensive "pleasure" for experiments.
�

My "fight":

My 1st flyer in 1987: "All power to the local councils." It turned out, "bicycle" already invented - Switzerland.
2nd leaflet 1987 Assign to Secretary General, to the cabinet of governors, prize - $ 1 billion. The host-nation interested encourage their managers on the end result: America overtaken by mass consumption and productivity per capita - receive bonuses, failed - fired. And rebel is not necessary
3rd leaflet 1987 "Measures are necessary and sufficient for the ...�
�
Their community in 1988 we called "ideological."
�
3 phase attempts to construct web 1990 "Self-organization of consultative structures."�
- How I felt Restructuring end badly, that the KGB wanted to hold the anti-people policies, to expand its control - the hands of the same people. - Too suspicious in "Arguments and Facts" were to compare living standards with the United States and then offers recipes.

The orientation of his I have not changed with Perestroika.
- As recorded in the CAS, and remain an anarchist.
Personally, I am well settled in the USSR.
But I am concerned about the fate of our universe, or rather, the only chance is apparently having the odds of Civilization. Sorry for the pathos.

"Caesar - Caesar" Time passed - Caesars, now trying to control everything, incl fate of the world.
Danger "latent totalitarianism" is not as spectacular as the fall of the asteroid, but much more dangerous.

The plan is as follows:

Small-scale production:
The invention of competitive micro-power, micro-enterprises, the autonomy of the raw materials, independent housing, self-transport.

The similarity of the Stone Age: Small-scale production.
The difference from the Stone Age: 100% marketability.
Internet does not competitive wholesale P2p-sharing.

Secure personal web sharing is difficult for tax accounting.
Taxes will take:
- With large corporations,
- With wealth.
Both taxes - "divine". For other divine - Mandatory contributions in lieu of taxes.

T o using the Internet expands the scope of self-governance, diversity.
"Divine" diversity "divine."
Bad not heresy, and heresy undivine like "everything is permitted that is not prohibited."
Attempts to all denominations and sects to drive the whole world into their sect - undivine.

�