|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micro-brand:What is it ?:Micro-branding - a system:1. Ensuring equal conditions for both new and old, large and small suppliers. 2. Non-state consumer protection. � Problem:Why prefer not to buy cheap - at the new producers?Why prefer not to buy cheap - at new vendors? - Because it is a risk, - Purchased product may break on Day 2, a new seller can disappear on the 2nd day, and it will be difficult to make a complaint. � Institute Disadvantages "brand�:"-" Feeding the state of corruption: We have to use the services of state guarantee in the form of licensing, certification and inspection."-" Braking new sprouts: Progressive ideas hinder not so much on the market is not blowing from the old forms, but the absence of a mechanism of consumer checks. "-" Overpayment "brands". � Location "delirium", "micro-brand"? Libertariantstvo:The idea of ??micro-branding emerged in the mainstream anarchist search:How to do without the state? How to protect yourself from the state and other rackets, etc.? - Creating a "proletarian" parallel RECIRCULATION. Micro-production, - how to ensure their competitiveness. � Solution: Consumer Community:Internet has greatly helped to promote new producers - making it possible to find reviews on their products.Analogues:1. Consumer Society.2. The State Register of unreliable suppliers. � Why do you need to enclose the new system? Disadvantages reviews:"-" Non-specialized search: search reviews conducted normally - ordinary unsuitable for this search engine."-" The ability to falsify reviews sellers. - For example, there are many sites that lure money and showing fake reviews. � Consumer Society:"-" "Pockets" - ie, the "system" control of state structures and the "brands"."-" Do not use the most effective - Internet tools. � Efficient Consumer Society DB:1. Independent2. Virtual - Virtuality associated with independence. - Do not use the power of the state machinery. 3. Global. � Mechanisms:Easy search:The system, which helps you quickly locate information.� �bureaucratic" rules of filling in the forms of complaints and other information.- It is necessary to ensure easy retrieval� 100% transparency, 100% freedom of information.Anyone can lay a complaint.� 100% freedom of speech.�Municipality:- Horizontally.- "Patrol" - such as Wikipedia. - Standards and regulations. The consensus mechanism of generating. See "consultative structures." � Analogues:- Wikipedia- NPOs, NGOs. � Human "branding" rather than legal:- Ie, the authorities appear not de-personalized corporate, and - people person.� Recommendations Network:- Simple, visual, automatic chain, in which it is easy to find a connection with the product to their friends.� Multi-level "black", "white" lists of people.Ratings - in many properties. |