|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Consultative structure:What for?:Dreamers in Palo Alto are coming up with ways to improve the lives and development of civilization.- In general, all kinds of internet services that make life more comfortable, and new technical civilization - for example, new types of transport and space rockets. Unfortunately, they are missing that in the 1 st place - for a happy life and civilization prospects - should: 1. Freedom from discomfort - before increasing comfort. 2. Getting rid of the dangers that can destroy the entire complex system that provides peace of mind. The main risks associated with the policy - for example, the danger of "managed democracy" .- Compared with her "natural" hazards like asteroids - are vanishingly small. The principles of democracy, the mechanisms of "checks and balances" have worked well in the 19th century. In the 21st century, with the watered-developed technologies, they are not enough. - Collective Intelligence Without democracy degenerates into oligarchy. This happened in Russia. By this move, and "democratic" country. For the sustainable development of civilization, most likely the only one having unlimited prospects in our universe - in the 1st turn, need internet services - Collective Intelligence directly public social science. The mechanism of consultative structures:Objective: Consensus.How it works?: Example 1:1000, incl 100 Doctors of Sciences say that the king is delicious.1 baby said: "The king - naked!" If the kid gave the argument (s): "Wee bo-bo", and no one bothered to refute the hypothesis of the baby becomes an equilibrium view of 1000, incl 100 doctors. As debaters - persons concerned, they are: 1. Suggest each other independent experts Example 2:1000, incl 100 Doctors of Sciences claim that the earth is stationary.1 idiot says: "And yet it moves!" Example 3:People do not care - if the king takes a bribe if elections falsified - only to grow revenues.1 dissident states: "If the register of property tax in the Constitution, then the benefits will increase" 1st parallel institutions should be - a social science.(In the sense - of a society)Media Disadvantages:- Entertaining and not analytical purposes- Non-scientific .. For collective development needs German order. Not everything is bad in the bureaucracy. Effective records management. Political-economy - an inexact science. Proof of it is relative. Therefore, you need: The rules of presentation. reference system and a thematic classifier. Ratings theses. Differentiation of ratings by different properties. Promising proposals. The ranking takes into account only the evaluation backed by arguments. Evaluators also have ratings. And also - for a variety of properties: User can have a weight - as a critic and as offering ideas. Consensus: Dissent weight - higher. Individual withdrawal opponents: For each participant being "black list" of his opponents. It - the participant - puts people, the criticism that he did not want to receive. Besides the "Black List" party, on request, is "white list" - the desired opponents. These lists can be grading the desirability, undesirability. Objectives:1. Increasing the diversity of ideas generated, Reduced fear of criticism.Man all be buried in the "black list" and will generate useless nonsense? - To your health - and when the violent criticism it all will be useless, that is to be afraid of anything at all to generate. But it will keep the health, at least. 2. Improving the efficiency of "meetings". - When the head of the chairman of the pits, giving the floor, then on the 1st forefront is not the case, and self-esteem, and performance is greatly reduced disputes. It is - part of the policy of non-violence:This institution continues the policy of elimination of coercion, of command and transfer of rights - the man himself.How it works?: People see problems, they freely share ideas, who see only the elect them. "Etiquette" is also unique.T e are chosen by the person himself, and not imposed on it.There are standard rules. But their function only: 1. Help in the development of individual write rules - how people want to interact with it. T e how many people - so many rules. 2. Help in automatically generating "on the fly" rules of interaction between people. Rules of different people in contact on the basis of the intersection of sets. Te whole idea works with the appropriate software. Unlike classical Forum:1. Branching:One big problem is the topic-tree sub-problems.2. Parallel branches:Each sub-problem is discussed in a parallel branch.Te same under-discussed problem of different groups "unanimous" people. 3. Consensus "arbitrators":Each participant chooses judges.By disputation on this parallel branch can only connect people Arbitrators intersect with those who began this parallel branch. General arbitrators and mean "unanimity" of people on this parallel branch. Submit your solution, or a vision, and that is about to start a new otvetvlenie- sub-problem - can anyone with enough "arbitrators". Moreover, "arbitrators" must agree to be. What is the point in the spray? - The main factor that reduces the generation of ideas - selfishness, or rather insulting. - People are wary of offering whatever came to their minds, the dispute turns into a futile wordy altercation. Competition already takes place - between fruit discussion Parallel branches. A person can simultaneously participate in the development of various problems and branches. Parallel branches have their own rules that are modified on the basis of more general. Arbitrariness is not, - more general rights of the participants have a greater effect. Arbitrators do not judge on the subject of the dispute, but only - Relationship. Financial issues it does not take too. Consultative structure (Innovation Network) and Venture Capital:They do not overlap:Scope Venture Capital - a trifle - "unicorn". Venture capitalist takes so many small instead of one - a major project. - Why ?: 1. The risk of hard-assessable. 2. The difficulty of the organization. 3. The term return on investment - large. 4. Investments required - large - with a venture capital organization. |