eng deu рус

Managed "democracy":

History - as the beginning of Managed democracy:

In the 1990s, the former communist "nomenklatura" was to do anything to stay in power:
For 1 night, well ardent Communists have become as ardent anti-communists.

Former Soviet leaders do not resort to violence in order to save communism, that is to:
1. They were not Communists, and careerists.
2. The KGB gave quite qualitative assessment of the situation. - Civil War "range" would be lost.
And while she did not commit specific crimes, it could be calm, at least for their lives.

Former KGB worked on the identification of the population sentiment.
A stay in power, "nomenclature" tried to meet these moods - that the purpose of staying in power.

She satisfies the desire of the population so as to:
1. Leave power, ie a monopoly on political decisions - for themselves, and not to allow the public to influence decisions - directly, and even through the deputies.
To do this, she shot the Parliament in 1993.
2. Change the desire of the population - in the best for themselves aside.
Last "nomenclature" completely failed.
She managed to compromise the ideas of democracy and liberalism.
T e "range" usually takes, though subtle sabotage.

In the 2000s, the spontaneously arisen watered-technology power made basic, and so perfect that they could even do at all without the election fraud and without violence against a small opposition.
In Russian - "democracy" - the "power" of the majority of the people.
However, people in the "hybrid democracy" in general, cut off from the power of the political decision-making mechanisms.
But the desire of the majority of the population - are always satisfied.
Imitation of democracy in the "imitation democracy" - is almost complete.

And that the people did not wish to real democracy, apply:
1. Discrediting democracy - on experience:
People are given the opportunity to submit proposals.
Of these proposals, announce those that show that people without professional managers no matter what is not capable.
This does not allow people organize in particular to produce really effective and quality solutions.
2. Advocacy and provocateurs.

This fundamental difference controlled "democracy" from classical dictatorships. -
Classic dictatorship are not considered with the opinion of the people, suppressed discontent - repression.
Burned on Stalin's repressions, who beat, especially at the nomenclature, it has become almost impotent. Now if Russia and kill Nemtsov, it is - amateur, "disservice" overly zealous Kadyrov.

Actually, the history of Managed "democracy" began long before the 1990s,
Back in 1930 shot minority - "enemies of the people", carried out numerous political processes - at "unanimous" approval of the people.
Totalitarianism was necessary precisely to control the minds of the population.

The difference is governed by "democracy" by Soviet totalitarianism is almost no information curtain. The reasons for this:
1. IT-technology - Cell phones, satellite "dish" and the Internet were one of the main reasons for the fall of communism.
2. Ineffective feedback within the government: That it led to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and almost lost power "nomenclature".

The natives of the KGB, and because of increased power, that:
1. Able to provide feedback - in the 1990s.
2. That agency then helped them to stay in power the former "nomenclature" CPSU - with through the development of Managed "democracy".

Ask Russian - 3/4 respond that they live in a democratic country.
Although Russia now - complete autocracy, dictatorship.

Russia - down and out country. But it is dangerous - as a source of social infection. -
There will be a lot of representatives of the authorities in the West, which like watered-Russian technology.

Fictitious democracy:

The point is only one - the limitations of the development of civilization.
Dangers that usually frighten - asteroids, disease, exhaustion of resources - are negligible compared to the risk of "Zombie Apocalypse".
Even a nuclear war is dangerous - only the cessation of the development of civilization. -
- Even with a large-scale nuclear war, humanity will not be deleted by either 10 times or one time. -
- It only stops developing. Not to mention the more than medieval horror of surviving life.
The greatest danger that threatens the development of civilization - "Zombie Apocalypse".
Democratic institutions are degraded.
Yes, in "democratic" countries, democracy is still growing.
But - so far.
Yes, the ruling circles have a policy with an eye on the electorate.
But - look requires less.
Political technologies, improved methods of propaganda.
Actual political monopolist can impose his opinion to the masses the right - even in the face of freedom of expression, even in the face of political competition, even in a completely fair election.
The only way out - the development of institutions of direct public participation in policy decision-making with the participation of all the people.