eng deu рус

Zombie-apocalypse:

Mankind has only one threat

Mankind has only one threat - the zombie apocalypse. - Asteroids, flu - nothing compared with this danger.
Is that more of a nuclear war would be necessary to insure further.
Zombie Apocalypse - it is not the living dead. This degeneration of the state, like Huxley. - End of the world will come quietly. As boiled frog:
�

Managed "democracy�,

Russia - a good illustration Managed "democracy" - sequential folding democracy - continuous support for the majority.
But even in the "free" world is the same process - slower:
Political technology improved, the Internet is taken under the control of invisible,
100 years ago it was less formal freedom, but they were not just formal.
People are distracted with rattles soundlights, shopping.
Direct democracy develops almost exclusively in Switzerland.
But even there the strengths of the world more effectively affect the citizens.
�

Russia - "anangard�:

Soon Russian unfair elections will not be needed:
of the "United Russia" are also 2 games. Fair elections will be programmed.
You tempted by the market and freedom? - You gave them, but in such a way that you felt sorry for them.
You incited to protest? - Get the war after the Maidan, a return in the 90s.
Got sick? - This is a controlled "democracy" - the behavior of the management of people, not just propaganda. Like, do you want to work not because we delegate authority.
"Progress" does not stop! - For 100 years, the authorities have learned to draw "chemical" reaction - to transform the proletarian revolution - Independence - in the imperialist war.
�

�softening� dictatorships:

Everywhere there is the replacement of violence, as the main support of the dictatorship in the propaganda in the world.
The effectiveness of political defiance and nonviolent struggle has forced dictators create the appearance of legitimacy and do not configure the majority of the population against them.
In turn, this brings to the 1st place and the role of counter-propaganda of the Internet.
�

The degradation of democracy:

God is with her, with Russia. But, what is much worse - degrades democracy in the "free world."
Formally, remain independent court press, elections are held for no violations.
However, state-administration of the same United States is gaining influence.
- No NGO, no institutions can not be compared with her capabilities:
This, above all, - promotion,
With political opponents can come to an agreement - and no one can prove that. Even if ulichat - law against collusion there - he used from time immemorial, propaganda always justified.
Why fight for power, if it can be divided?
"Progress" watered-technology does not stop!
Outwardly, everything - like 100 years ago. - The population of the same. But power is becoming more powerful.
Moreover, the degradation of democracy in the 1st world began in the 21 th century - until then it just grew.
�
Example: �Patriotism versus terrorism� (Patriotism against terrorism)
- The most popular slogan of propaganda in the United States after the attacks of 11.09.2001 year.
At the same time objects of patriotism are not only perpetrators of terrorist acts, but all inconvenient for US political regimes and movements that oppose the dominance of transnational corporations or reject the US world hegemony principle.
�

reception: Simplification, narrowing of perception:

It offers a simple and artless formula labels.
For example, spell "war on terrorism" will bless any political showdown, - there was nothing to analyze, explain to the people - who establishes control over the oil fields who calms the rebellious province, who is cut under the guise of political opponents ...
�
Example: Presidential elections 2002 in France:
Political circles close to President Chirac, a campaign to undermine the influence of the Socialists has been deployed (actual competitors) and concluded in the 2nd round of voting Le Pen's far-right ZH.M.- representative.
At the same time carried out the mass intimidation of the French threat of Nazism.
At the same time, the fact that in the 1st round 11% of the vote (only slightly less than the far-right and the socialists) received Trotskyists, ie ultra-left, not at all covered in the media.
Like the fact that after the success of Le Pen's ultra-staged grandiose riots on the streets, which led to numerous casualties.
As a result, the President of France was the man that 4/5 of the French did not want them to see.
�
Example: The pressure on the press:
After the terrorist attacks in New York, 11.09.2001 US government recommended the media to refrain from a detailed coverage of the activities of Al-Qaeda, by citing Ben-Laden and from the interview with him.
�
Example: The war with Iraq in 1991, was portrayed as "clean" and fair.
Western media have touted the "surgical strikes."
In this contrary evidence suppressed. Those cases that could not be concealed, called annoying "bugs."
�
Example: Footage devastation of Serbia by NATO bombings
- In the election clip Socialist Labour Party of Great Britain.
His cut BBC - "the most respected and objective international information tool."
�
"If people knew the truth about the war, it would be stopped tomorrow." (Lloyd George's War Minister 1914-1918.)

Communication with the independent press:

Questions to the US President for press conferences - are available in advance by journalists.
Consultants any figure prepared for possible issues, rehearsing answers.
�
Example: Dead babies:
US President George. W. Bush used the story about the dead babies 10 times during the 40 days before the invasion of Iraq.
Later it became known that most of the "witnesses" were prepared and exposed to well-known company for public relations Hill & Knowlton.
�
"Mass culture, along with the military and economic power, the United States provides political influence." (B Brzezinski)
�
Example: American contras help support ranged from 13% to 42%,
(Contra - is the anti-government forces in Nicaragua, in the 1983-86 biennium) - depending on the language issue. - Set psychologists Lockerbie B and C Borelli:
If the question referred to Reagan and the contras or ideological labels used to opposing forces in Nicaragua, assistance supports a large number of Americans.
If the matter was referred to the amount of aid or from both sides of the problem, to provide assistance to rebel contras wished much smaller number of Americans.
�
Example: thriller "Bullet to Beijing" (1994, Hollywood):
His heroes were fighting with the Chechen mafia.
But just started the Chechen war. And now ... the US has banned censorship.
�
Example: Slander in the Allende government (1970-73), American secret services
It has been published thousands of defamatory material in Chile and abroad. (Philip Agee, a former CIA officer)
Western intelligence agencies are using the world's leading news agencies (Reuters, Associated Press, and others.) For distribution of promotional materials.
�

Regressive majority - in the United Nations:

Regressive, most aggressive created not only within countries but also in the United Nations - at the international level.
What to do ?:
1. Representation of parts of democratic countries: Crushing of these countries.
Similarly, as the Ukraine, Belarus in the USSR have a voice at the UN.
For example: Representation of Scotland, Wales, the cantons of Switzerland.
�
Dictatorships are prone to expansion - to the creation of great empires, democratic country as well exist in unions confederations.
Democracies are not afraid crushing. They protect, for example, effectively and together, for example - into NATO.
�
2. Creating a democratic "communes�:
"Commune" not in the sense of the joint property, and - the unity of the Spirit.
�
Where to create the commune ?:
For example, - in Greenland, Antarctica, Alaska.
�
30 years, I thought - where to get the people?
And then God himself sends refugees.
The assimilation of refugees - squandering them.
�

What to do ?:

1. Civil society should take on more and more functions,
2. Openness and transparency should reach 100%.
3. Institute of elective recipient needs the information. - From whom no secrets, but who have no right to disclose it, - only for certain procedures.
�

How to reconcile Atheists Islamists ?:

Conflicts are now particularly destructive and dangerous.
People are extremely irresponsible pits for their benefit.
In Russia, slander Americans in the US - on the Islamists.
Islamists course rapists, but libel has side effects:
People on both sides are guided not to compromise, constructive cooperation and peace, and the suppression of external "evil."
�
The reconciliation with the Islamists atheists should begin - with the "philosophical" differences:
�
Clerics require recognition of faith in God, and strict adherence to regulations - to reduce the desertion of his flock.
Why atheists need to engage in dialogue - directly with the believers - about common interests with them: morals, values, humanism - without affecting the differences as much as possible.
For unanimity, for example, dislike of violence, hypocrisy, cynicism, egoism - is more important than intellectual justification of norms and differences.
�
However, you can even find a mental assent - in the hypothesis:
This is the birth of black holes, LHC occupies a pico-seconds, and the creation of the world takes a whole week, if the time taken to transfer to ours.
Earth, animals, man, his concepts of good and evil - were given the initial conditions - to create the world.
Earth people - the purpose of the created world, its center.
One girl gave a doll more than girls. The girl said: "I gave her?"
- It does not matter that revolves around something.
�
The probability of development of a civilization so low that:
- At the 1st World with humanity has to a lot of empty worlds-bubbles,
- In our world, when we arrived at our level, although the simple life in our universe a lot, even a lot of highly-organized life.
�
The further fate of civilization depends upon us.
In a nuclear war, humanity will not perish - perish civilization.
But the main danger now - not a nuclear war, and - the degeneration of the state.
�
Dialogue is now the main factor for the survival of civilization, dialogue between people - directly.
To do this, and created the Internet.
Protection of the Internet and the creation of a tool for dialogue - the primary task - is now.
�
Now - a critical time:
If civilization is to live another 100 years, and it will live billion.
In 100 years, people will learn to control the social danger, not prevent conflicts.
They will learn to correct their shortcomings even genetically. Repeatedly increase life expectancy, healthy life. Escaped with biological bundle.
But for this it is necessary to hold 100 years.
�
Already the current technology can not feed 27 billion people, - a trillion.
Already the current technology can provide cheap transportation into space to accommodate a number of industries, and interested persons.
Back there is no way.
�

Public social science:

Discussion of important issues for all people is conducted only at the elite level.
This creates the danger of isolation elite interests.
It is necessary to discuss the important issues for all people to make affordable, convenient - for all people.
To do this, there was the Internet.
You must now create online tools Public social science
�

100% unofficial th = a 100% flexibility:

in an authoritarian society, official science man running for the title, then the title is on its side.
Title gives privileges in science and in society.
Getting the title due to the political loyalty.
Lack of a social "science" - the distortion of the scientific:
Benefits in science hinder objectivity, dissemination and development of fruitful new ideas.
�
On the other hand, parallel, non-governmental scientific RANS lost.
Although, in the loss of her "help" special service - for compromising the very idea.
�
How can there be an effective model ?:
1. Without title "doctor", "supervisor", etc., which give privileges.
2. Instead of titles - ratings.
- Rankings - plural - for various properties - for each person,
- Ratings not only people, but also articles.
- Rankings - 100% -obektivnye. T e are not affected by the holders of high ratings, or something else outside.
- Rankings of people - regular, not a one-off.
These ratings are the only tool helps participants to see the high-performance work - almost in real time, but does not reduce the freedom of such communication.
3. 100% -nauchnost: for rating - based on scientific principles: evidence, etc.
. �
�