eng deu рус

Sweden + Switzerland + "Deliberative structure�:

To date, the best in the world political system - in Sweden. Her and should be studied.
Yet it is possible to add self-government in Switzerland.
The main thing - the social outcome. And the fact that he made no prohibition of private property and the market, ie, without compromising freedom - so it's even better.
- "New industrial relations arise under the old socio-economic formation."

The only bother is that socialism in Sweden rests on coercion.
The Social Democrats just reformed the state, forcing him to protect not only the interests of the rich.

Hypothesis: Liberal-democratic socialism:

There are "democratic" forms of organization of production competitive with the classic private.

a 100% open-mindedness:
All means are good for the purpose of: Liberty, equality, fraternity.
More specifically, the funds will not "all", and not only infringe the freedoms, rights, and "divine."
Freedom - the preservation of liberal, non-violence, relaxed. In t h is not a redistribution of taxes and so forth.
T e whether the achievement of equality of opportunity - purely due to the organization?

Factors:
1. Internet,
Hypothesis There are Internet tools that make democratic management of production not less effective than hierarchical.
Hierarchical production historically comes from the government.
T e is not the fact that it has no power efficient - in terms of the Internet.

2. Communion - the spiritual unity in the "syndicates".

Democracy and the Swiss municipality unreal:

Instead, democracy will always be "propagandokratiya�:
1. The oligarchs are all-powerful in this respect,
2. People are too weak mentally alone.

Switzerland held for bogey:
- Say, unattended crowd pon-voting themselves in harm:
- Many referendums have imposed laws that violate human rights, minorities, etc.
.
The decision - "consultative structures�:
In 1989-90 I was offering "a consultative structure�:
It differs from the referendums in the Swiss - a mechanism generating issues that put to referenda:
Questions for referendums also has the right to put any man.
But they have to go unmanaged nobody, organized with the help of Internet tools process refinements and discussions - with others:
"The majority" still has no right to prohibit to put questions to a referendum, but putting questions to go through the procedure of scientific discussion and to answer questions put to him.
If the matter is serious, then there are strangers. And in the dispute, optimized Internet tool is born truth, or rather the issue is close to the optimum.
During the public discussion people will understand the issue and will vote knowledgeably.

Internet tools also seemed to be based on the optimal structuring factor.

Switzerland - the best there is right now:
Although Switzerland is now better than the other 199 countries of the world, but its political system is far from perfect.
Switzerland - carried out almost ideal Komunarskiy version of anarchism.

Syndicalism:

I have not found profound models, proving that the Syndicate - union resistance group - optimal for the organization of production and social organization in the future.
( "Charter of Amiens" in 1906 he proclaimed "that the syndicate, today's resistance group, will in the future the group production and distribution, will be the basis of social organization").

However, not found scientific evidence for "Councils".

Bakunin proclaimed "not the creation of new states, and the destruction of all domination."
But his proposal for the organization of production have not been simulated in the Internet era, not to mention the experiment.

Criticism Kropotkin, Bakunin:

1. "The goal - the seizure of the means of production" (Kropotkin):
But the power of the means of production - that is power.
Te main role government now - not power over people and over the means of production.
Here the social democrats to the right of anarchists.

If you would come up with an effective syndicate, organization of production, and it is not necessary to seize the means of production. - The workers themselves would gradually gained itself the means of production and without ekspropriyatsii.

2. "Organization of the production workers themselves will develop," they need only during production to protect themselves from violence.
"Tunneling" is not provided, then in the process of moving every moment should be more attractive prior to the workers was the desire to protect themselves and not to return to the host-provider.
But beforehand no one comes up at every moment, then, the next time will be worse for a while, at least.


Syndicalism more real all - in some European countries and Japan. - They are:
- Sufficient democracy and
- Development of domestic production.

Syndicalism becomes real only when the internet. - Collective management of Internet-based tools are more competitive, traditional.


Although my community, syndicates and anarchism, utopian self-government is not in principle.
However, they are utopian - CIS - here and now. - Community Putin simply shoot, and the government does not allow it.
More realistic of all, in Russia to promote a banal social democracy - to turn the imperialist war into a "war" class, in the 21st century, it really lead even bloodless:
Not weapons, and - counter-battery counter-propaganda.

Kuzbass miners have tasted perversion of communism and the oligarchy.
And agreed to return to the high road of civilization - social democracy.