eng deu рус

Public ownership?

Transition to free collective exploitation of the "public" means of production will be.
And will go to renting a remotely operated equipment.
The share of equipment in production costs greatly reduced - in the collective, rather than the sole use of it.
One reason for that - reducing the number of products in a series of games.
�
Go to rental equipment:
Go to rental equipment is similar to the transition from the feudal property to the lease of land - in the 19th century.
True, indeed, the land has become less "private�:
a. partially limited by the monopolization of land,
b. in part - to restrict the rights owner of the land - as well as the restriction of the environment
order .. c. partly nationalized land, and give up long-term small rent.
�
2. The cost of land is also not disappeared, although it decreased the proportion of land value to the final product - an order of magnitude.
It also reduces the share of equipment in production costs - especially when you go to rent.
�
The means of production to rent even more comfortable than the ground, - the equipment can be used not by years, but by the hour, and even multiple users - simultaneously.
�
1. The profitability of the means of production is reduced, turns into depreciation,
2. In the 19th century - the rich got rich and the poor grew poorer, because the poor could not invest, and they've taken up all salary.
In the 21st century - the gross investment, "proletarians" overtaken investment "capitalists", and share ownership "of the capitalists" began to decline.
3. Reduces the unit value of the means of production of consumer goods.
4. Transition to intensive equipment rentals (see. Above)
5. Disappearing excess profits - profits relative aligned - by: a. Increasing the availability of information, b. Reduce the cost of information processing, c. Increasing optimal operation of the equipment.
�
As a result of these processes, class "capitalists" disappears.
Reduces its political weight, as the weight of the landowners.
�
This process is trying to slow down with the help of:
1. "administrative resources" - state.
2. Intellectual unnatural "property."
3. The fight against freedom of information.
�
The task - to use the "democratic life" - to maintain a natural process against his braking.
The state becomes dangerous "capitalists" - now - and not so much in the sense of controlling the conditions of production, but in the sense of danger for the development of civilization in general.
�
T o the means of production "expropriate" is not required because they are not profitable.
T e need not "nationalize", but rather to preserve the means of production are often unprofitable.
�
Mismanagement "public" means of production:
1. Careless Operation
2. Irrational use.
�
As landlords are now do not look over the land, and the charge is rangers,
As in Germany, officials encourage farmers,
- Similarly, - small "owners" of the equipment will also motivate the rational "possession."
�
However, this applies until, - the means of production of consumer goods:
The means of production are increasingly differentiated - now:
- Major power equipment - processing resources.
- Small equipment - production of consumer goods.
�
Major power equipment bastion of "capitalism" is becoming endangered.
It:
a. Extractive industries,
b. Chemistry - yet. - Single power chemical treatment also reduced quickly - with the development of biotechnology.
�
However, the private ownership of the subsoil and space, will be even less absolute than the ground.
�

homestead acts in the United States in 1862:

The settlers of the symbolic $ 10 received land.
And if someone started to actively settle land, then after 5 years he could gain ground in full ownership - and the area it was 65 hectares.
In this way, the government shrugged off two challenges at once, thousands of migrants to settle down and attach utastki.
�

The Proletarian Revolution and Marx's new elite:

The proletarian revolution Marx seems unnatural nonsense:
Always power states passed only from one elite to another.
Always power elite controlled the main resource.
First, the main economic resource of slaves, and then - the ground, then - the car.
Naturally, the Russian "Great Socialist Revolution," power was not the proletariat, while the party-state apparatus.
�
However, Marx was right:
Information Technology:
1. Do - main economic resource - information - in the broadest sense: technological, economic, political.
2. Do - main economic resource, too - living labor - as in the pre-state era: information differs from material resources in its dynamic: Static information "rent" does not work.
3. Do - elite - people who control information.
�
This poses new challenges:
1. Pirate Party - the party of the new elite:
Nonsense - not the power of the people do not have material possessions, nonsense - "Intellectual Property", which is an attempt to give legal information unnatural material properties.
�
2. The Internet-based tools:
The new elite takes power there and then - when the collective will of creation tools, transfer and use of information.
The difference from the information and material resources: The most effective organization, which implies:
� The openness of information.
� horizontal, ie democracy - instead of hierarchy.
�
3. The breadth of coverage. "Virtuality" New elite:
The new elite wins not by monopolizing information and of its dissemination.
"Virtuality" is the lack of permanent, hereditary "kings" of sectors and within sectors. - "King" can become a leader - for an hour.
�

Why Putin Zhirinovsky unscrupulous cynics?

- Back in the USSR Communist ideology served as a propaganda function.
�
�