Divine works


eng deu рус

Advisory structure and Survival:

The seriousness of the respectable wealthy people is not surprising.
  - They are concerned about different toys, - villas, shares, personal vypendrezhom.
  At best, they are engaged in social "progress", - scientific discoveries, humanization, improvement of society.
  However, it is more important, before "improvements" - to reduce the danger.
  The main danger for the Earth's Civilization is the risk of a historical impasse - "Democratic" totalitarianism.

& nbsp;

Gorbachev saved Civilization:

- There was a high probability of operation of an unreliable Russian warning system in the 1990s.
  This overrides all the mistakes Gorbachev made.
  He did not let the devil go, but - while the other way around.
  Although the conspiracy of the State Emergency Committee for the collapse of the USSR was not, but to influence them - have already tried.
  In the bad 1990s, the Russians themselves are to blame.

Is there a need for a person without Civilization?

Politicians lie - in the case of even a full-scale nuclear war, a person will not perish. -
  Man is more deadly than a cockroach.
  But civilization will perish.
  There will be a degrading herd of mutants without a future, mores are much worse than in the Stone Age.

Neither an asteroid, nor a volcano, nor a disease Civilization will not ruin.

In addition, they are extremely unlikely.
  Thanks to Gorbachev, the chances of a nuclear war are also low.
  But there is a danger that is not talked about at all, and the probability is over 50%.
  This is "democratic" in quotes totalitarianism.
  The end of history will not be a liberal democracy, but a totalitarian one.

This century is not just an age of growing opportunities.

He, above all, is the age of growing dangers.
  The danger of the 22nd century - the main and last one will be the danger of using the ruling immortal "vampires" - Artificial Intelligence to manipulate puppets ..
  Artificial intelligence is much more reliable, efficient, secretive, cheaper, and is associated with much lower costs than the control apparatus.

Is it possible to call a person reasonable?

- So-called "successful", "held" solid uncles are engaged in toys, at best - public.
  People are surprisingly pliable, addictive, presumptuous, trusting, uncritical, careless, petty, vain.
  While classical democratic and market institutions and mechanisms automatically survive Civilization in modern conditions do not guarantee.

Crowd Unreason:

It is incomparably more important not to be shaken by protests, but to organize the development of rules and decisions, in particular for parallel economies and politicians.
  Protests are not effective. - The "simple" demands of protesters are now easily perverted so that their "fulfillment" at best does not realize the wishes of the protesters, and only discredits the protest, in the conditions of growing professionalism of political technologists, saboteurs and propagandists, expansion, complication and development of their resources and tools.

Theoretical errors are very weighty.

- Marx got it mixed up, and the consequences were tens of millions of deaths.
  - In the 19th century, fashion was to absolutize individual factors.
  Freud replaced God with sex. Although priests before the KGB also replaced sex - God.

The theory can not be left to politicians.
  In addition, if their class interests are counterproductive.

Mental pain is more important than physical pain,

- if you multiply the strength of pain by its duration.
  Somehow they speak about the victims of tragedies, although the dead do not hurt anymore.
  - The physical pain lasts for a moment, and the pain of the deceased's relatives - the rest of his life.
  The feelings of children are much stronger than those of adults.
  It is difficult for an adult to understand the feelings of a child who has killed his beloved father.
  The well-fed does not understand the hungry.

Is it possible to call a person intelligent?:

The pleasure of sex - for a second, and the trouble from it - for a year.
  And, nevertheless, everyone thinks about pleasures, and not about how to eliminate suffering before.
  Because people are driven by instincts.

The human mind is adequate to the conditions of the Stone Age.
  In theory, a person should return to it.