Tsarism-Putinism:
Rulers still learn.
Tsarism |
Putinism |
Public consciousness is left to itself. |
Propaganda is the basis of the regime. |
One-sided rule.
Isolation from the people. |
Feedback,
Modeling, forecasting. |
Absolutism. |
Fictitious Democracy and Liberalism. |
Repression - Support |
Temptation and deception - support |
Classiness, arrogance. |
Formal equality. The democratic nature of the rulers, at least public. |
Proletarianization of masses. |
Social security. |
World War. |
Wars of the optimal size are small victorious. |
Separation of church from state, special services |
Using Church and Religion |
The separation of the school from special services |
Using Education |
Soldier class:
The social support of the Bolsheviks was, mainly, the "class of soldiers", not the worker.
For 3 years of the World War, the soldiers managed to forget that they are peasants.
The soldiers formed all the signs of a social class.
Dangerous Stability:
Putinism is incomparably more stable than tsarism.
He is able to manage even "revolutions."
- By the hands of the people themselves - to the detriment of the people.
Special services teach the people - "life", in practice the harmfulness of revolutions.
True, the revolution of the 1990s was only 50% manageable, but this element as an element was the last.
Through social heterogeneity:
On the 1-st side, social cataclysms, as a rule, are accompanied by brutal excesses.
On the second hand, fictitious democracy and liberalism allow us to work, creating a social heterogeneity, without cataclysms. Siege instead of storming.
Cataclysms can be avoided altogether. - Not only the government, but also civilian, parallel structures can manage social processes.
Moreover, the rulers are more connected by hand.
|