Divine works


eng deu рус

Anti-Forbes: "Profits are necessary for prosperity" (Steve Forbes):

"The French economist Thomas Picketti called for a ruthless tax on luxury and income tax at the global level.
  But any taxes that interfere with the creation of capital and the obtaining of fruits for the risks that they have taken will ultimately harm everyone. "
Http://forbes.kz/life/opinion/pribyil_neobhodima_dlya_protsvetaniya

But Picketti proposes to separate investments from consumption of luxury.

Yes, for all investments it is more profitable than eating. But one does not exclude the other:

                                               
Incentive NOT reducing investment

& nbsp;

Investment

Tax = 0

Luxury Consumption

Progressive Tax

Where is the risk reward measure ?:

"Profit is a reward for risk."
  "Profit is not immoral, it's right."
  - Substitution of concepts. - The market is considered moral.
  Is the reward for a low risk tolerance - a carrot, for greater patience of work - wealth?

Yes, the profit is relative, - half of the investors are ruined:

"Changes and turbulence are the norm.
  We all hear about those who have succeeded, but we do not know about the financial losses of others.
  The high income of a successful innovator is usually short. There is no balance here.
  (Last year, the New York Times Co. sold the Boston Globe, bought 20 years ago for $ 1.1 billion, for only $ 70 million).
  - But the proportional reduction of the prize of the lucky people, with social insurance - the losers .- Absolutely does not interfere with progress.