Divine works

eng

Morality and patriarchy:

"Morality & nbsp; - accepted in the society views of the good and the bad, the right and the wrong," good and evil, and the set of norms of behavior resulting from these representations.
(From & nbsp; Latin & nbsp; mores & nbsp; are common & nbsp; traditions, unspoken rules)."
En.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral

I consider the main factor of "morality" in society - the political system in it.
  (See "Mistakes and the truth of Marx")
  I think the opinion that "we must start with ourselves" is propaganda suggestion. -
  - I do not deny the need for personal moral efforts, but I think that the "social" efforts are more effective and important.

Power is the cause of the fall of morality. -
  - In a society in which egoists, careerists, and "walking through corpses" are successful, in such a society the notions of good and bad will deform to the "laws of the jungle".
  - In a society in which bandits, "raiders" are successful, - the difficult life of a thief in law will be romanticized.
  - In a society in which frauds are successful, honest "fuckers" will not be considered a good thing.

That is, there are no absolute moral norms.
  Nevertheless, people always look back at other epochs and countries, the opinions of authorities.
  Strongly affect the perception of the right and wrong - religion.
  Finally, the notions of good and bad are strongly associated with instincts, human genetics.
  In this sense, we can talk about averaged morality.

The social source of morality is equal social opportunities. - Equal people force each other to adhere to "moral" norms to each other.
In the same place where arbitrariness and lack of rights - the power will always offend someone.

Democracy is just the ability of any person to influence the legal conditions of his life.
  Compare Europe now with wild Europe 2000 years ago. -
  People have not changed. The political system has changed.
  Russian propaganda offers a choice between paternalism-caring and liberalism-freedom "to die of hunger."
  At the same time, under democracy, people create rules for themselves - under which property inequality is an order of magnitude smaller than in "caring" Russia.
  And one of the foundations of democracy - just liberalism-freedom does not subordinate to imposed rules.

Accusations of democratic morality in homosexuality are the favorite "hobby" of Russian propaganda.
  But much more immoral and dangerous - Russian phenomena,
  - when the son of a prosecutor rapes someone, and he gets away with it,
  - when the police "plant" instead of a bandit - innocent,
  - when everything is sold and bought.

In Europe, really ate. - In legal, protected conditions, many are "furious with fat." - They compromise their own civilization, which has been so hard to come by.
But in Europe, socially active, not indifferent people are an order of magnitude greater than in Russia, in which "everything is useless."

What should I do?:

Neither the "top" nor the "bottom" of the restructuring is unrealistic. -

Even in an authoritarian state, there is little from his head that depends. Putin himself revolves in an authoritarian environment.
Gorbachev tried to "jump above his head" - nothing good this is not over.

"Below" is the "democratic" inert passive majority, which accepts imposed rules, from which the most arrogant demagogues will get out.
Even if the dictator is overthrown, it is not a fact that the dictator will not come to power even worse.

"Divine enterprise" - group "start with yourself":

The best option is to "start with yourself," but only in a collective sense. -
- Create sub-societies with their own norms, with their own morals.
Even in the most totalitarian societies there have always been some sects, bandit groups, finally.

The Internet greatly helps the search for unanimous people - today.

Why "enterprise"?
  - Economics is a very important factor of morality.
  Not even in a Marxist sense.
  - It's hard to have your morals if you are completely dependent on someone.

In this sense, private property is good.

"The Divine." - I do not put here any religious meaning, but only - the meaning of "sublime" morality.

& nbsp;

I do not like and I do not want to argue with anyone - I tend to be more likely to seek like-minded people.
It is for this - and not for agitation or persuasion - and I write here.

I'm looking for even not so much like-minded people as many - unanimous people - who share similar moral feelings.
More about these feelings:

"Money for matter, but not for money":

(Money is for business, but not a deal for money).
  I never worked for money.
  I always had a small salary.
  - I worked to be able to do business - the creation of something useful.

Demand is also a criterion of utility. Like money-price.
  But it works in Palo Alto.
  In an immoral environment:
  1. To check the fruits, you need a rotten tree,
  2. Appreciate more - rotten fruits.

Non-violence:

I do not like imposing. - Even when my daughter was 1 year old, I did not impose anything on her.
And grew morale than everyone around him.

Even a cat is not forced to go to one place. "Instead, I give each sausage for sausage to the place."

Patriarchy:

"Patriarchy is when society, the state is more important than personality" (Alexei Venediktov).
I understand patriarchy in a broad sense, as a hierarchy, as a system of coercion.

Why is Russia the most patriarchal country?
  The reason is natural selection. - Genghis Khan created a cultural mutation - "the state is above all."
  Russia has inherited this mutation. Thanks to this mutation, a unique expansion occurred - In just 200 years, an empire was created, the largest of which was not in history
  For example, Catherine the Empress of Russia was a liberal, but, more importantly, a great-power serf.

Feminism:

It is patriarchal-hierarchy including in the family - is the reason for the oppression of women.
In this sense, a woman can be a patriarch.
Why children are capricious? - Because their mothers are patriarchs.

Women in most societies were subordinated to someone. Even in the "democratic" countries of the early 20th century, they remained powerless.
  Now feminists often, by inertia, break in the wrong direction.
  - Do not help, for example, children get rid of "guardianship" -dictate. Instead, they compete with men in neglect of children.
  Either worse, accept the "male" rules, - when the slave sees liberation as an opportunity to become a slave owner himself.

I see the goal in being able to build relationships in my micro-society without violence, not to resort, in particular, to the services of the state.
  It is for morality to replace coercion.
  There were precedents of such societies. Many times.
  These are many religious communities.
  However, coercion remained in them as before.
  - As before, morality in them was based - on fear - religious.
  So to say, the motivation was not positive, not for great love, in the majority.

But to completely without repression? - This is a very interesting task. Much more interesting than other meaningless scientific problems.

Vegetarianism:

I'm compliant. We "There is nothing better than a good person - it's so good to ride."
  I eat meat - when forced, - although really unpleasant.
  Vegan, often such, as they say - from "pride."
  - Eating milk and eggs, you do not harm anyone. - Conditions on poultry farms is another matter,
  Vegans could spend their energy on making artificial meat - real now.

2016

2017