Divine works


eng deu рус

Network Economy:

A networked economy is not Network Marketing.

How to live in a dictatorship, corruption, lawlessness, arbitrariness?
  Why do not people use technology in Europe?
  Why do not people sell products to Europe?
  - Because:
  No money for equipment,
  No collateral for loan,
  High interest loan,
  It is not known how to learn technology,
  It is unknown how to take permission to sell in your village, not to mention exports.

The chance now gives - the Internet:

1. Automatic "conductor":
  Rules, algorithms can now replace management.
  Do not reduce the area of ​​decision-making - a person.
  2. The mechanism of collective decision-making - in real time.
  And this is not a vote, but a rapid development of consensus taking into account multiple ratings, and the involvement of volunteer experts-not proprietors.
  3. Low risk of financing:
  Small loans - from person to person, without centralization,
  Mutual insurance - with a low probability of deception.

& nbsp;

Errors and the truth of Marx. Liberal Socialism :

Russia will really save the proletariat, - IT-proletariat:
  Indeed, the "information" formation differs from the former, -

1. The class that defines politics for the first time is not a narrow circle, thanks to:
  A. Democracy,
  B. IT-technologies.

2. "Living labor" again becomes the most significant factor of production, - as in the Stone Age:

From the 1st, the parties, profits fall to 0. - as it should be with the "Ideal Market".
  Example: Euro-bonds with negative returns.
  - Due to:
  A. Growth of enterprise freedom,
  B. Reducing the role of violence, Growth "Economy of the gift."
  C. Perfection of information flows, - IT-technologies.

On the 2nd, side,
  Folk investments like crowdfunding outstrip the "capitalist" investments. - due to:
  A. Profit Reduction, Profit Milling: Profitability, competitiveness goes down - determined not by investors and top managers, but - by simple engineers.
  B. Growth of well-being - the mechanism ceases - when capitalists spent on investment and wealthy, and workers only ate.

The Communists were worse than the capitalists:

If the capitalists, exploiting workers, doomed them to poverty,
  That, the Communists, expropriated the means of production not only from the capitalists, but also took them away from the workers, and condemned them to starvation:
  In most parts of Kazakhstan, the majority of people died of starvation, te more than 50% of workers.

Marx's mistake was that the means of production should not be nationalized, but, on the contrary, divided into as small parts as possible.

1st: If you look at automatic production lines, then it catches your eye that the processed parts, the products move in several parallel threads.
  Streams must be single.

2nd: The microprocessor revolution dramatically reduced the production lines.
  For example, she killed an automotive conveyor:
  Robots collect cars in one place.

3rd: Biochemistry reduces chemical plants:
  Enzymatic-catalytic complexes are 10 orders of magnitude smaller than chemical reactors of the 20th century, but are capable of much more.

2nd revolution of nonviolence:

The first revolution of nonviolence - was the cessation of coercion, primarily to labor.
  The second revolution of nonviolence is the cessation of the violent maintenance of contractual relations.

The first revolution of nonviolence was the Bourgeois-democratic revolution:

Until the New Time, the problems of overproduction, sale and unemployment were not,
  - there was only a problem of shortage, lack of production:
  All products were sold, all employees worked.
  The treaty did not matter, - the power of authority and the power of power prevailed.
  In this sense, communism was a retreat into feudalism.

The economy of the gift is a trust economy.

"Divine court" is a court not based on violence, as a means of fulfilling social contracts - rules and 2-sided treaties.
  Shredding production flows and reducing the cost of information networks increases the number of participants in the Network Economy by:
  A. Shredding subjects,
  B. Network size extensions to the global.

Reputation replaces coercion:

A very large number of participants creates a highly competitive environment, a choice.
  - There are thousands of other participants who will implement agreements and rules without any coercion.
  Shredding subjects reduces individual risks.
  - The use of weapons to eliminate losses becomes more expensive than losses themselves.

In addition, there are willing to remake the work just for free:
  - Wide choice, efficiency and shredding of works makes their cost negative.
  - Satisfaction from work in the absence of coercion exceeds the trouble of labor.

The moneylender carries his own risk by 100%. Usury will simply become unclaimed.

The family is a production cell with a common household.
  Involvement of courts and armed executives - to secure Marriage contracts with their children - destroys families.
  The community is a big family.

The cessation of civilian violence will finally stop the violence internationally.
  - With the global network economy, and the disappearance of civilian functions of states - wars will disappear.

& nbsp;

The networked economy is a social, social economy:

Thanks to IT technologies, networked business is becoming more efficient than the economy of large organizations with centralized management, accounting and hierarchy.
  Network economy is a one-ranked economy, with horizontal links.
  A well-developed IT-tool takes on all the functions of hierarchical management and replaces it - in the absence of managing subjects

Leasing and Crawfunding:

Production networks of proprietors are most effective.
  Entrepreneurs, consumers are interested in training and lending new employees-participants - to increase the competitiveness of the environment, the choice and simply reliable subcontractors.

Outsourcing Limit:

"Divine enterprise" is an enterprise without violence.
  "Divine enterprise" is a network of independent producers realizing production relations in real time.

& nbsp;

I am a liberal socialist:

"Left" has always been associated with freedom and democracy.
  And, only Stalinism "confused the cards" - social justice associated with the dictatorship.
  - Like, liberalism, the jungle only impoverish the poor.
  I do not agree with this statement.
  Stratification is not the freedom of entrepreneurship, but its limitation, an "administrative resource."
  For example, in Russia, a high% for a loan, now, - because of corruption.
  In an ideal market, "surplus value" disappears.

Democracy retreats:

Global regression occurs in the world.

The last centuries, beginning with the Middle, democracy was advancing.
  - Bourgeois-democratic revolutions in Europe, the fall of monarchies, national liberation movements in the former colonies.
  In the 20th century, dictatorships fell: in Germany, South Korea, Portugal, Spain, Chile and in many other countries.

Unfortunately, with the beginning of the 21st century, the process turned back:
  In post-Soviet countries, the democratic processes that successfully took place after the collapse of the USSR "successfully" turned down.
  Putin won in Ukraine - did not let her into Europe.
  "Arab spring" did not take place,

The proportion of people living under democracy is decreasing: the third world remains undemocratic, but it is growing demographically. With democracy in the world, only a few% live in people now.
  In the third world, people connect their hopes not with a "rotten" democracy that has "compromised" itself, but with traditionalism, Islamism, patriarchy.

Democracy is narrowing even in its "strongholds." -, Growth of "Hybrid Democracy" - propaganda and control of special services, restriction of the Internet.
  Reduction of violence and coercion became.
  Armaments in the world are growing.
  There remains a real danger of war. It can provoke it - Russia.

Personally, I am concerned not so much with the reduction of freedoms, social justice and equality, as the unlimited development of civilization.
  - Very real dead end development in the style of Huxley.

& nbsp;

Nonprofit enterprise
  Without capital

0th gate delay

Production - on order.

Network of collective entrepreneurship reduces risks almost to zero:
  Employees themselves do not want to make a profit of a capitalist - they prefer to receive a stable salary without business risk.

Collective management is difficult, but has the greatest potential.

Not "People's Enterprise."

The shares of the participants are decreasing.

& nbsp;

The owner of the blast furnace.
  Co-op of owners.

& nbsp;

& nbsp;

Without investment - labor investment is overtaken for the first time.
  But it is more profitable to not centralize them, but leave them distributed.

& nbsp;

A networked economy is not just an efficient model of production organization.
  The networked economy is the survival of civilization as a civilization.

The world is unstable: Well-being, and the very life of people depends on the case.
  To kill a couple of billions of people nuclear winter is not needed:
  Greed forces the elite to balance on the brink of the abyss.
  Simple people do not understand what their actions can lead to.

Scenario is possible:

In some authoritarian country, another rebellion occurred.
  However, the interests of the world's largest military powers are connected with this country.
  Between which there was a conflict. Limited. Non-nuclear.
  The weapons of the 20th century are now completely ineffective. It is easily neutralized by numerous networked micro-drones.
  Conflict only causes restrictions on world trade.
  Termination of seed supplies and fertilization, for example, in Bangladesh, will lead to the death of half of its population.

And, not even this disaster is the worst.
  The worst is that the 2nd chance. The second start of civilization can no longer be.
  - Starting conditions will not be the same:
  • degraded culture and genotype,
  • Spent available resources,
  • spoiled ecology,

A man has become too omnipotent to remain infantile, to live by the old rules,
  It is necessary to organize the friends of God, - "Divine enterprise"

The networked economy is the decentralized operational flexibility and sustainability of the world.
  States themselves in their traditional form are the cause of instability.

Composition of the Network Economy:

1. Internet tools
  2. Rules
  3. Standards.

States rely on violence:

Intergovernmental agreements are based on violence, on murders.
  History of international law:
  First there were contracts between the kings.
  Breach of the contract, usually gave the other party the right to military action.
  Now the punishment, usually - sanctions.
  However, within states, violence continues to be a grant for the implementation of sanctions:
  If the "subject" of the state ignores the sanctions, and carries the "contraband" goods, then the police will stop it on the border.
  If the subject will resist the police, then she will use the weapon.
  
  In global relations, states are not necessary and ineffective.

The role of technology, and especially drones in ensuring law:

Surprisingly, anarchists have not worked out a simple question of ensuring human rights:
  Surprisingly, the libertarians of New Hampshire reject drones - the main technological pillar of libertarianism - from modern times.
  Suppose an anarchist becomes a "noble" robber or "divine" terrorist, and will restrict the freedoms of others, including their right to life.
  How will it be stopped by libertarians? - Moral Exhortations?
  At the same time, IT-technologies now provide an opportunity to stop it and protect people in fact without harming it:

Collective Self Defense System:

People, participants carry automatic surveillance devices that are constantly in the wireless network.
  These monitoring tools are continuously and automatically monitored by IT tools.
  The system is constantly monitored by volunteers on duty.
  In the event of an Emergency, the attendants:
  1. Notify the nearest relevant members of the "DND" ("Voluntary People's Guards" in the USSR)
  2. I launch the corresponding drones at the scene of the incident, including drones located in the "DND" members - in dwellings and on cars.

Not against policemen, but instead of policemen.

Policemen in autocracies:
  "-" Very inefficient - for the population, there is almost no help.
  "-" Corrupt,
  "-" More harm from them:
  "-" Put the innocent - for reporting.
  "-" Often "protection" - from criminals receive more, salaries, protect what will pay more, not ordinary citizens, Quite simply "Werewolves,"
  "-" The interference of democratization, the backbone of autocracy.

"Divine Shadow":

& nbsp;

Network Palo Alto:

The network "Silicon Valley."

& nbsp;

                                                                                               

Uber

Searching for and calling a taxi.

Airbnb

Short-term rent - accommodation, search in the world.

Blue Apron

Delivery of ingredients for cooking.

Pinterest

Social service of photo hosting to find interesting ideas.

Dropbox

Cloud storage.

Square

Online payments and mobile POS-terminals.

- These are the small edges of the global economy of the future, which will supplant the traditional.

& nbsp;

Journal "Network Innovative Economy":

is a discussion of socially significant projects.

Element - ineffective:

How do you create projects like Uber now? - Spontaneously:
  Accidentally meet the problem, and, at the same time - information on it,
  Ideas are fantasized,
  Casually are partners,
  Venture capitalists are accidental,

99% of attempts fail.
  99% of people repeat 99% of errors.

How do I suggest?:

1. 100% openness
  2. Cataloging, systematization:
  2.1. Problems,
  2.2. Projects,
  3. Cataloging, structuring - Wiki-FAQ
  Structuring is not just an index, but a library type catalog.
  Maximum simplicity: Principle: Minimum of logical actions for understanding.

Information systematization:

1. In democratic countries - there are very complete databases of departments.
  Completeness is good.
  But it is difficult to choose a more important one from a large body of information.
  Now journalists and scientists do it.
  Journalists choose very badly - populist.
  Scientists present results very badly - not for the people.
  However, it is possible to create different competing automatic information filters that would select the information most conveniently - mentally, ee conveniently - from the point of view of psychology.
  2. In non-democratic countries - freedom of information - no.
  Paradox, but also there socially significant information falls into the media - not much less than in the 1st world.
  NGOs, NGOs, "foreign agents", scientists, journalists do sociological surveys, interview officials and carriers of official information.
  Parallel statistics often turn out to be more accurate than a closed official one.
  However, it is possible to create different competing automatic parallel catalogs of information, Databases that would collect information as conveniently as possible - mentally, ee conveniently - from the point of view of psychology.

project: "Collective Decision Making System"

& nbsp;

project: "The Cat's Home"

& nbsp;

Forcing the US to democracy-openness - through:

- Piracy of films - coercion to accept the system:
  - "No intermediary" - namely:
  - Payment - after using "Intellectual property", not before use.
  - Forcing the US to democracy-economic - through Piracy of films:
  It will be more difficult to issue a personal account to a person than a corporation, this will give a head start to the "Network Innovative Economy."

questions: Locks in Germany.

- Torrents.
  - Open Search engines - without censorship.
  - "Ecuadorian" -free resources - in countries without prohibitions.

Social network of movies.

How does it work ?:
  You type in the name of the movie, - circles of its active amateurs come out.
  In the amateurs you learn the addresses of file-exchangers and mp on which movies are laid out.
  And, fans of films - are constant. You can block sites, but you can not block a person - in the 1st world.
  You can simply save lists of fans - somehow they will be found.

Universal Serialization:

The Internet also was originally intended only for a limited number of persons.
  Now it's time to make all computers "servers."

Mesh-network - the only rescue of freedom.

Parallel charity:

Parallel charity is needed not so much as advertising, and not even as a springboard, but because it will experience much less resistance, and, at the same time, it can be much more effective than official charity ("Legislators only become interested in the issue when they feel pressure "(Bono)).

Business Cloud:

Business processes are standard.
  - Millions of people solve the same problems.
  So why not combine them?
  Can not everyone win at the same time?
  - They can. - If they play not against each other, but against the entropy.

The economy of the gift = The economy of knowledge:

Hiding knowledge, for example, about how to bypass competitors, is the main factor hampering development now.
  The problem is not that trillions of dollars are lost because of this,
  But in the fact that this creates the danger of stability in the development of Earth civilization.

"Bicycles" are reinvented millions of times.
  Let's say a successful, and knowing how to do, has $ 1 million from its secret
  10 million people agree to pay $ 1 for taking advantage of his knowledge.

The economy of the gift is the payment of the goods after it is shown, and not the "cat in the bag".
  The difference between knowledge and material goods is that their disclosure devalues ​​them.
  Therefore, the Economy of the gift is the only way to pay benefits to all.

Only a reliable system is needed:
  1. Guaranteeing the "market" payment, te on the evaluation of goods-knowledge by a large number of users, and
  2. Providing mechanism for payment on the fact of consumption, t billing.
  The Internet just allows:
  1. Ensure transparency of use, including with the help of "spyware" programs,
  2. Maintain a database - "Black list" for all people on Earth.

National enterprises:

People's enterprises are enterprises belonging to the labor collective, its employees.
  There is no "exploitation" on it by the "rentier."

However, despite the "savings" on profits, People's Enterprises are almost not-competitive - even in "free", legal countries.
  At the same time, the policy of the "ruling class" is a 2-power factor of the low prevalence of the People's Enterprises.

The main reasons for this:
  1. Ineffectiveness of collective management.
  With 1000 shareholders, management becomes almost independent.
  Often, for example, it shows unprofitableness, even in legal states bribing some "shareholders" and hiding income.
  There is a management market, the more expensive the larger the enterprise.
  2. It is often more convenient for workers to buy shares of not their own enterprise - on which they work. What people in the 1st world do.
  3. A simple person to become an employee-co-owner of a People's Enterprise is as difficult as a small entrepreneur.
  Т е co-owners of the National enterprise act as banal group capitalists.

Network Economy vs People's Enterprises:

Competitive should be exactly - Network of small proprietors using high-efficient Internet tools.
  The coordination system should be more efficient than a similar hierarchical management system.

Property in this case, it may well be - shared, - as in the People's Enterprise.
  Only this scheme is somewhat artificial, and with the rapid spread of the Network economy will be greatly lagging behind.

Network Economy and Dictatorship:

Industrial and scientific and technological revolution increased labor productivity by an order of magnitude compared to subsistence farming.
  Why then manufactured products in dictatorial countries are much more expensive than those made by hand?
  - Under the dictatorship, the mechanism of "exploitation" and impoverishment really works, competing only with manual labor.
  For example, in the USSR, the price of jeans was set as large as possible and limited only to clandestine manufacturing by hand.

Example: Chips in Uzbekistan:

After the fall of the USSR, the borders were partially opened and prices were leveled with the world ones. - Clothes are cheaper, and food is more expensive.
  The democracies help dictatorships:
  1. Subsidizing agricultural production,
  2. "Intellectual" property.

Now chips in dictatorial countries are much more expensive than those made by hand.
  The reason - Corruption - in a broad sense - abuse of unlimited power, in particular - total monopoly - in all spheres of society:
  1. Poverty:
  The prices for food in the world of dictatorships are just as low as in the 1st.
  But, they are low for the 1st world. - In the second world, chips are not "affordable" for people.
  One of the mechanisms of total "exploitation", a reduction in the price of labor is artificial unemployment.
  2. "Production" reasons:
  Fees and restrictions on the import of equipment for the production of chips,
  Permits for production, and "control" for the production of chips,
  Restrictions and duties on the import of ready-made chips.

The concentration of capital is determined not by production factors, but by the threshold of bribes.
  Therefore, the main factor of a safe world - without dictatorships - in creating:
  1. Micro-productions.
  2. Remote work. - then there will be:
  A. Economic interest in the development of the Internet,
  B. Economic independence from the regime.

Non-violent plan - economic:

The mode is isolated from financial flows.
  Raw centralism goes bankrupt.
  The dictatorship "flies into the trumpet of history."