Patriarchy and non-violence:
Russian Community of the 16th century:
It was almost a golden age:
1. Christian moral standards proved to be more effective than pagan norms.
No wonder the triumphal procession of Christianity took place in Europe.
2. Openness: Everything is in sight.
In general, - openness is more effective than violence.
The force of moral influence is not known, because they do not see his examples.
Although in the USSR, in the 1950s it was quite significant.
There were no prisons in the Russian Community.
Almost there was no drinking. The peasant consoles, later - the state, - landed on the "opium needle" to save tax collectors.
The only thing that spoiled life is:
1. Holodomor:
The life of the peasants was subordinate to the animal-Malthusian mechanism.
The death of children from hunger is not a weak stressor and a temptation to sin. - In the lean years, the robbers left, sometimes - villages.
2. The raids of Tatars and robbers.
Crimean, in particular, the Tatars before the 16th century, in general, largely lived "Raid economy."
By the way, landlords initially performed the function of defenders, organizers of defense.
They also concentrated stocks that could be loaned in a lean year.
Kabbalah was out of fashion. - Wild cases became widely known and created the illusion of their prevalence.
By inertia there was an expansion of the Russian Empire.
By the 20th century, inertia had run out. The industrial revolution that reached the village ripped the Malthusian loop. Robbers on the roads were withdrawn, and the world could be created by the people in a completely civilized way.
But the bar turned into parasites.
The meaning of religion:
The meaning of religion - in reducing mental suffering.
At the same time, religion was not so much an opium relief, as it gave norms of a hostel, on which, by the way, state laws were also based.
The norms of religion without violence managed to "raze" almost all the incidents that occur in life.
Unfortunately, for "class relations" they turned out to be ineffective.
In addition, the Church has become too tied to politics.
City life gave a higher standard of living.
But the pay was - a violation of the work of the moral system, established by centuries in the village.
Natural farming in the countryside relieved of moral problems connected, in particular, with trade, but its productivity was really low.
By the 20th century and in the village itself, along with the industrial revolution and production specialization, stratification had begun - the destruction of the centuries-old moral standards of the Community had reached there.
The Patriarchy of the Community:
The main drawback and foundation of the 16th-century community was patriarchy. -
Hierarchical submission of "junior" to "senior".
On this hierarchy, by the way, the hierarchical construction of the entire state was also based. -
For the peasants, the landlord was the father-breadwinner, and the tsar was the father.
In addition to the moral impact, violence was also very common. -
In relation to children. - Moral norms are simply "hammered".
& nbsp;
Moral shock, personal example,
& nbsp;
& nbsp;
Community-21:
In 1988, I participated in the project "Community" in the village of Terpenie, not far from Gulyai-Pole.
The initiator was Volodia Mizger.
The idea was simple. - To connect the positive mechanisms of the Community with the technologies of the 20th century.
In the Novocherkassk library I studied a green house.
Did not work out. First we were dispersed ... But this is another story.
We wanted to build our life on our own, and not at the command of the CPSU.
We even maximalist dreamed of solving Soviet problems:
- Harmful influence of "street" on children, - with the help of building your own "street".
- The deforming influence of the Soviet school, - with the help of building your own school.
- The narcotic influence of Soviet ideology.
The deformation of a person consisted in:
1. In the tendency to ignore problems,
2. Inadequacy of "significance" values, - the tendency to attach importance to secondary - music, clothing.
3. Falsity, selfishness, cynicism.
Communism has not coped with what was promised, and people in it are disappointed.
The achievements of the 1950s remained in history - the USSR experienced a rapid moral degradation.
We hoped to create a "ship", an "island" on which not only one could experience a dashing time, but also create an alternative to it.
At the same time, our Community was completely secular. - We hoped to launch the moral mechanisms of the Community - without reliance on religion.
Although our attitude towards religion was very positive.
& nbsp;
The capitalists are to blame for communism. -
- By violence, injustice and inequality, they caused a reaction - violence against violence.
True, the violence of the Communists was even less creative.
& nbsp;
The Kremlin propaganda creates the appearance that in Europe, in the conditions of freedom, all people are completely depraved.
It would be interesting to learn statistics, who have more debauchery - from bosses or from human rights defenders ?:
1. Chiefs naturally select aspirants to non-control, cynics,
Chiefs hide information - it means there is something to hide.
& nbsp;
Man is allegedly vicious, and only patriarchal power can lead a person to lead well,
People close to the "Leader" can also make mistakes, but:
1. They are rich, so they have less temptations.
Although, on the contrary, the natural selection of power selects the most vicious.
2. There are legal mechanisms for purification.
Although, on the contrary, they work only on concealment, mutual responsibility and punishment of the unmaskers.
|