Divine works


eng deu рус

Consultative structure and "Democratic" totalitarianism:

Earth Civilization is threatened by a dead end development - Democratic totalitarianism.
  Democratic totalitarianism is Managed democracy, controlled freedom.
  The mechanisms existing in democratic countries for the democratic control over the totalitarian degradation of some public institutions, in particular the special services, may not be enough.

People always acted on each other and manipulated others.
  But the development of science, in particular, psychology and information technology raises the manipulation to a new level.
  People, even human rights activists and politicians can think that they act freely, but, in fact, their desires and preferences are formed artificially.

The manipulation of voters is already being successfully carried out not only in authoritarian regimes, but also in the Free World countries.
  But the real danger is the manipulation of human rights activists and politicians.

Event Management. Provocation policy:

A ghost hangs over the world. - The specter of "Democratic" totalitarianism.

This will not be Orwell's dictatorship, nor Huxley's artificial world.
  Outwardly everything will look absolutely natural.
  - Formally, all mechanisms of democracy will work. All freedoms will be preserved.
  However, decisions will not be generated by the people.
  The people will only affirm, legitimize, support the decisions of the authorities.
  This will be a continuous manipulation of the people.

The era of "democratic" totalitarianism comes.
  Not even an epoch, but a dead end of history - the "epoch" is a period that has an end.
  Further, the art of political technology is perfected so much that there will be no return.

"Advisory structure" is the only salvation:

The only way to avoid a dead end is the "Advisory structure".
  Only a structure that has the principle of free multiple parallelism of independent decision-making will not be subject to degeneracy and usurpation of power.

To be asleep to immortality:

We need to create the "Advisory structure" before the era of immortality, after which "Democratic" totalitarianism will have an additional biological basis.
  The former ruling "classes" will turn out to be only pale, unskillful similarities to the "vampires" of the future.

Paranoia?:

Maybe it's paranoia.
  However, the asteroid risk is many orders of magnitude lower, but millions of dollars are spent for its reduction.
  If the risk is small, but multiplied by the significance of the disaster, it gives a danger incomparably greater than any other.
  The asteroid, disease, volcano end of the story does not mean.
  They threaten only the death of millions of people.

KGB coup:

The KGB controlled Perestroika in the USSR and its disintegration.
  The question is only in scale. - Whether the spontaneous processes prevailed over "Management of events" and "Politics of provocations", or vice versa.
  The fact that the putsch of the State Emergency Committee was a plot of the KGB is:
  • Alexei Mukhin - Gen Director of the Center for Political Information
  • Gavriil Popov - one of the leaders of the democratic movement in the USSR and Russia in the late 1980s and early 1990s & nbsp;
  • Chairman of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation and the main ally of Yeltsin in those days Ruslan Khasbulatov
  • Writer & nbsp; Alexander Prokhanov.
  • Head of the Analytical Department of the KGB Nikolai Leonov

1990:

The first thought that the KGB controlled Perestroyka came about in 1990:
  • The events were too much like a performance and production,
  • The KGB behaved inadequately,
  • Apparently, the special services had instructions not to touch provocative activists. - When the KGB-Ist found a hiding place, where I hid the typewriter on which the leaflets were printed, I did not take any action, I did not even pull out the machine!
  Then I initiated "Self-organization of the" Advisory structure. "

Transitional Epoch:

Now - the transitional era of imperfect "Democratic" totalitarianism.
  - The authorities are only concerned about power.
  Instructions in the secret services direct the performers so far only to identify criticism of specific rulers, such as the prosecutor's gene, or to plan the overthrow of power, even if it is non-violent.
  The abstract "pure" science does not pay much attention, because it is difficult to formalize the corresponding instructions.

However, if you do not take preventive measures, the process will become irreversible.

Export of "Democratic" totalitarianism:
Trump would not have won in the US elections, without the "help" of the FSB agents who were preparing his "populist" and "irresponsible" but very effective speeches, well-established and widely used in Russia, in particular by KGB agent Zhirinovsky.
  Trump himself seems to have been as much a puppet as his voters.
  The calculation of the FSB - in the management of Trump in the future, and through him - America, and the whole world.
  Putin comes and goes, Putinism grows and develops.

Hybrid hierarchy:

In the future, even a rigid hierarchy will not be needed.
  - The "subordinates" will be influenced not so much by orders and threats, as mildly, by a psychic influence. "Subordinates" will make decisions allegedly independently and freely.

Taxes and Spirituality:

The Roman Caesar during Christ did not climb into the souls of people.
  Now the payment of taxes is a crime against humanity.
  A person without intermediaries must decide who and what to give money for.

Political Monopoly:

Politicians have their own interests, secrets.
  Already, various political groups conclude secret agreements, are blocked in political monopolies, and use cynical political technologies aimed at achieving not public, but corporate goals.

The danger is the improvement of these technologies.
  Perhaps the formation of a political monopoly, for the control of which the existing democratic mechanisms of separation of powers, freedom of information, etc., may not be effective and insufficient.

The growth of manipulation can occur even without a reduction in the level now existing in democratic countries, for example, freedom of information, by the way, very limited.

Democracy and totalitarianism:

The two main factors lead to the degeneration of Democracy:

1. Submission to the majority is the main principle of Democracy
  2. Propaganda and political technologies to create a majority.

Trend:

There is a paradoxical simultaneous growth of democracy and totalitarianism:
  If you compare an average country, for example, Turkey - 200 years ago and modern, you can see:
  1. Growth of "democracy":
  - Transition to the republican form of government,
  - The growth of the formal role of parliament,
  - Growth of political freedoms,
  2. The growth of totalitarianism - the introduction of ruling circles in all spheres of public life:

200 years ago:

The Sultan was engaged in a narrow range of issues: war, taxes.

Now:

Surveillance of special services, for all citizens,
  The hidden influence of the ruling circles - on all parts of public life:
  On the media,
  - on the Company to nominate candidates for elections,
  - to the Board of Religious Organizations,
  - on the boards of joint-stock companies, trade unions, public organizations,
  - on the Education System.

Even Particle Democracy can be controlled:

- Citizens will consider themselves involved in political processes.
  But, in fact, their activities will be "gently" managed.
  - Not with the help of prohibitions and restrictions on formal rights and freedoms, but with the help of control and influence on all public institutions through which citizens exercise their rights and freedoms.

Russian danger:

Advanced research in the field of consciousness manipulation is carried out by the Russian special services.

Russian oppositionists are like a healer who, by inept and prolonged use of antibiotics, creates a kind of bacillus that is resistant to any medications.
  It is necessary to get ahead of the adaptations of the "bacillus" - the improvement of methods of treatment.

The KGB, for example, has changed tactics - now instead of jamming the transmitter, it "silences" the receiver directly - the perception of people.

Russia, too, has come up with a fictitious transfer of power "Putin-Medvedev", which in the future can become indistinguishable from democratic.
  Even if the transfer of power is factual, the "warring" ruling elites have similar "class" interests, tempting them to take a monopoly collusion.

One of the areas of advanced research is the use of various psychotropic methods, except for purely propagandistic, especially against dissenters, instead of repressive psychiatry.

The greatest danger is the cooperation of Russian special services with special services of "free" countries. -
  - The existing mechanisms of control over special services may not be sufficient.

Fictitious 2-partyity:

Russian special services can improve the American 2-party system. -
  In 2018, in the elections, special services can arrange a performance with the transfer of power from the party of Putin to another party, "Medvedev-2."
  Putin's grouping will be preceded by agreements and security guarantees:
  1. "Coalition". - the ruling group will include half of Putin's and half of Medvedev's 2.
  2. Compromise,
  3. System of arrangements: If you do this, then we are it. - Against sudden movements.

What is the danger of Democratic totalitarianism?:

- in that the development of civilization can be determined:
  Not the interaction of many independent factors, but - the only one,
  Not an objective process, but a subjective one,
  Not the "divine" motives of different people, but the desires of a narrow group.

People can fall into a political monopoly, go through a process of very "divine" "natural selection". - Aspiring to power, even carried out by non-violent means.

Another, although so far distant, danger of the degeneration of Civilization is the development of political information technologies.
  - Monopoly political grouping will benefit from narrowing the circle of initiates, maximum automation of political technologies.

Low adaptive flexibility with new external hazards.

The danger is the possibility of a symbiosis of political monopoly and Artificial Intelligence.

Consultative structure and "Democratic" totalitarianism:

The difference between the Consultative structure and the classical Democracy - the sovereignty from the bottom up:

The participatory form of democracy only declares the involvement of sections of society in the political process, the right of participation, recall of representatives, etc.

Dalia's polyarchy also only declares the strengthening of political competition, pluralism, fair elections, freedom of information, without supporting them with effective mechanisms.
  Repeated R. Dal, the radical right of the opposition to challenge the government's decisions was in the most totalitarian regimes.

Authoritarian regimes in the 21st century have learned to successfully formally satisfy all these requirements, turning them into an empty phrase, using only propaganda for this.
  The only way to avoid unfavorable development is the "Consultative Structure". -

The main drawback of both the Partitipatory Form of Democracy and the Polyarchy of R. Dal is the lack of a horizontal mechanism for coordinating the interests and opinions of minorities.
  For this they are invited:
  - A classic representative mechanism successfully exploited by authoritarianism,
  - Submission of requirements of the "executive power", which help only to identify activists,
  - Self-management successfully turned authoritarianism into arbitrariness.

& nbsp;

The advisory structure is the only possible form of Direct Democracy.
  It is a tool for direct development of a single solution by a large number of people.
  This is a multi-level system:
  Most decisions are made - at a low level,
  But these are "executive" decisions. - They should not contradict the laws adopted at high levels.
  At high levels, general decisions are made about rights and freedoms.

The temptation of power is great in dictatorial countries:

The Bolsheviks in Russia in 1917 "used the old state machine", in fact replaced the autocracy (absolute monarchy), only under communist slogans.

Bulk in Russia, too, causes distrust of the statement "I want to become president."

Unequivocally used compromising material exclusively for the struggle for power - Rakhat Aliyev in Kazakhstan.

Power in the second, authoritarian world is big money, it is property, it is unprecedented in the 1st world control over all state resources.

Internet-based organization against the entropy of natural selection:

On the second side, the anarchists in the Donbass (Ukraine) in 1919 also made the mistake of refusing to help the miners against the dominance of the Bolshevik commissars. "They refused to organize Soviets without Communists on a theoretical basis, that the Soviets are also power."   Natural selection won.
  I wonder if the anarchists would then go against their principles, would they then manage to abandon temptations in a country oriented for power?

& nbsp;

Properties of the Advisory Structure:

- Orientation to nonviolence:

In the state, enforcement of decisions is ensured by violence.

- Parallelism:

The advisory structure can and should work in parallel with the state.

- Fragmentation:

There is no need for power struggles, as there is no power in the Consultative Structure.
  That is, for the work of the Consultative Structure there is no need to have autonomy ,.
  The advisory structure can begin to work in small and secondary areas, in particular, not related to politics.

- Lack of elections, representation, separation of powers:

- With the help of one Internet tool people perform all public functions.
  The system of checks is not needed, because the interests of people are presented without any mediocre.

Non-violence and the Consultative Structure:

Nonviolent methods are needed not only to drive out the colonialists or overthrow the dictatorship.
  Their main purpose - public administration - instead of the state.

Lustration and Advisory Structure:

The main reason for the successful transition of former Eastern European societies to democracy - unlike the Soviet Union - is the possibility of lustration of communist cadres because of the presence of opposition politicians and the memory of the recent market past.
  Lustration was, although not the main, but, indeed, one of the leading reasons.

The advisory structure makes possible full lustration - without the need to use old specialists.

Algorithm:

1. The population is mastering the work of the Consultative Structure - on the abstract from real life, and, possibly, from politics - a virtual game.
  2. A bloodless revolution is being made - modeling shows the high probability of the death of usurpers in case of an attempt of terror on their part.
  At the same time, guarantees are given for "pensions" that exceed the average by an order of magnitude, with controlled expenditure.
  The property will have to be confiscated, t to property is power.

& nbsp;