Divine works


eng deu рус

The Greenland project. Settlements. Landscaping:

What is more important than human life or the preservation of the Greenland ice?
  Man has always used nature.
  The only question is that the use is not predatory, calculated and useful for future generations.

Greenland's ice cap for any melts.
  Why not to win the "living space", let at the expense of accelerating the melting of the glaciers of Greenland?

There are no forests in Greenland.
  - Not because the climate does not allow, but because the seeds have become frozen during the glacial period, and the new ones are recorded very slowly.
  For human life, the forest is more favorable than the tundra.
  Why not help nature, and not make plantations?
  Suitable for this area is only 1-2% of the area of ​​Greenland now.

Why not reduce the area of ​​glaciers in Southern Greenland - sowing them with spores of brown and black "snow algae"?
  (Diatom, desmidia algae (www.moip.msu.ru))
  "Snow algae" for growth is enough for 1 month of positive temperatures - puddles or wet snow.
  The cover of brown algae "wet" season will increase by 2-3 times.

In some years, the entire Greenland area is already melting in the summer.
  GMO algae could also cover the whole of Greenland.
  We need only different grades - blue and green - for high places, growing under snow and from under snow - for a region with large winter precipitation.

Algae could even form the soil directly over the ice cap. -
  "If it were not for the current of the ice." - Soil suitable for flowering plants will have time to form only in stagnant areas.
  But that's enough.

To help "Snow algae", and also to sow the area liberated from glaciers it is possible - productive GMO-lichens - for creation of soil already under bushes and trees.

Greenhouse complexes, including hydroponic ones, of Greenland could feed all 0.5 billion people in Nigeria if it migrated to Europe, more specifically to Denmark.