Divine works


eng deu рус

Non-violence and Information war:

Information war instead of hot:

Likewise, as a non-deadly weapon can displace a lethal one, so the Information war can supplant the hot one.
  Of course, the Information War is also evil, but the evil is disproportionately smaller.

Similarly, as the vaccination of cowpox prevents lethal smallpox - a human - Information war can prevent the death of Civilization
  The hot war is now deadly for the very existence of civilization.
  How the vaccine produces immunity, and information modeling can very clearly show the devastating results of a real war.

Virtual war can be very adequate, - 99% reproduce real war.
  It is capable of replacing the real war. - The defeated will agree that with probability 99% of the real war he will also lose.

Informational "war" is not a war, even as a trade war - between the interests of corporations.
  In the Information War, the interests of different peoples coincide. They have nothing to share.
  Property information - in the transfer it only improves and increases.
  1. With proper organization, - the Consultative structure, - Information war turns into a regular dispute and political information.
  2. With the technologies of the information age, the Earth is able to feed 1 trillion people.
  Everyone will survive - if they are reasonable.

Putin unleashed an information war, and he will lose it:

Totalitarian "democracy" - Putinism is no less dangerous for the survival of the Civilization
  Than a hot war.
  Information "war" is forced, but it is necessary and extremely important.

1. The state-trolley is only 2-3 thousand.

Activists may be 2-3 million
  A nationwide mobilization appeal is needed.

2. The correct organization of activists can be more effective than the "Factories of lies" because:

a. Truth is more effective than lies,
  B. Sincerity and enthusiasm are more effective than mercenaries for money
  C. The advisory structure is more efficient than the hierarchical structure.

& nbsp;

& nbsp;

Survival of Civilization:

Survival of Earth's Civilization, apparently the only one in the universe that has "divine chances," is not threatened by asteroids or bird flu. -
  The survival of civilization is threatened by the growth of technical capabilities with the human mind and instincts unchanged.

The US and Europe will not be able to control the growing opportunities of dictatorships as mushrooms.
  People are unhappy with the inequality in dictatorships, but their discontent is being set on, they are being set on the USA and Europe, their main hindrance, the alternative in the world.

Security is necessary for openness:

Openness is the only chance of survival:
  For adequate and reasonable behavior, people should not distort the threats, the sources of "non-divinity" and the causes of inequality.

For the sake of openness and transparency, democracy is necessary. -
  - The distortion of reality, deception and hiding information - is the main method and the only form of existence of dictatorships,

Democracy begins with democracy:

Managing your own life requires managing your own life, not transferring it to the hands of "good" politicians.

For non-infantile independence, "color" revolutions are not effective and even dangerous by violence and unpredictability.
  Democracy should begin with the development of institutions of self-government.
  The optimal form of self-government development is "Consultative Structure" .

The Danger of Violence:

1. Nothing to lose except chains?
  - Life can still be lost.
  - The dictator does not need a people - a parasite that claims oil revenues.
  The dictator is forced to spend on "maternity capital", etc.

2. Violence will create power-dictator again, since dictatorship is the best means, the organization of violence.

3. Violence in our time is a danger to the very existence of civilization.
  Events can turn with the use of nuclear weapons.
  Scientists say that a nuclear war will destroy all life several times.
  But it will destroy civilization - 1 time, but it is irreversible.

On the other hand, violence, coercion is a way of existence of centralization, power.

& nbsp;

How to reduce the risks associated with violence?

You can move from two sides:

1. From above.
  - Developing non-violent mechanisms to resolve contradictions and conflicts of interest, thereby reducing the detachment of the people from the centralized management of his life. Т е democratizing this management.
  The optimal tool for achieving compromises and consensus is the "Consultative structure" - a hierarchical mechanism, but not the authorities, the coercion, but the gathering, representation and alignment of interests.

2. From the bottom,
  - increasing the autonomy of people's lives, - eliminating the very causes of conflicts.

Economic Democracy and the Network Economy:

First there must be a word:

The small theoretical, botanical mistake of Karl Marx put civilization on the brink of survival in 1962, 1985, and now, not to mention paying tens of millions of victims only in Russia and China.
  The road to socialism lies not in dictatorship and violence, but in the opposite direction.

In 1917 in Russia, the factor of the theory was no less than the weight of the factor of the cultural and historical situation.
  If the Socialist-Revolutionaries had a theoretician of the scale of Marx, Russia could go not by the way of centralization of the economy, but by the way of self-management of factories.

In 1991, voucherization was doomed, she was a KGB scam.
  - In the absence of democratic mechanisms for managing the economy, "socialist" property was inevitably stolen by organized state and criminal groups.

"Advisory structure" :

- It's at the same time:
  1. The mechanism of parallel social theory, in particular social modeling.
  2. Mechanism of self-government.

What will it give?
  1. Unity of the democratic opposition.
  2. "Professionalism".

"Liberals" of the 1990s were provocateurs who compromised liberalism.
  They did not conduct a liberal policy, in particular free fair elections and fair legal competition.
  Some of the liberals were proteges of the KGB.
  The rest is just laymen.

Collection:

The third function of the "Advisory structure" is the differentiation, fragmentation and organization of a political liberal and democratic environment.
  A mixer of ideas, people, values ​​and desires is the main weapon of the KGB now.
  Counteraction slipping into the dictatorship should start not with agitation, not reassuring someone, but with the gathering of unanimous people and like-minded people.

This is the real purpose of this article.
  Why it makes sense to contact me:
  I made 3 attempts to create an "Advisory structure" in 1990.
  I participated in the creation of an autonomous Community in 1988, not far from Gulyai-Pole.
  I was trying to create a "Divine Enterprise" in the 2000s.
  I suggested creating the Network Economy back in the 1990s, - decades before the emergence of the Sharing economy
  I autographically printed several thousand leaflets in 1989 in Novocherkassk.

"Divine Enterprise":

The main conflicts of interest are in the economic sphere.
  Accordingly, it is necessary to develop:
  1. From above. - Non-violent mechanisms of economic coordination.
  The optimal mechanism for such coordination is the Network Innovative Economy tool for production coordination - in real time.
  2. Downstairs. - Autonomy of farms from the state

1. Network Innovative Economy :

- This is an economic Internet network. Coordinating offline communities in real time.
  How it works, an example:

& nbsp;

2. Autonomy of farms from the state, "Natural economy":

is the economic independence of the grass-roots democracy, which gives political independence.
  This isolation of the dictatorship from financial flows - from below.

Danger 2018:

The main threat to Russia's security is Putin.

Before the election, the opposition of Russia will start fighting for fair elections.
  In the face of a real threat to his life, Putin will issue an order to the special services, including trolls, to provoke an international crisis, in order to rally the people around him. - In a troubled world, dictatorships do have some advantages.
  See: The Danger of 2018

Putin is not a fraer, he does not bury himself and knows how to calculate risks.
  He is interested in a lawful state, at least in the degree of peaceful transit of power, to the degree of the Charter of the CPSU.

Russia is smarter than Brazil?:

In Russia special services:
  - better model the future,
  - better negotiate with the "opposition"
  - better people will scamper.

Variant "A purse for life" - if Putin has the mind enough:

1. Do not wait for the assassination attempt 2022,
  2. Collect KGB compromising evidence, and guarantees.
  3. Negotiate with the opposition oligarch: "You have a purse, I have a life"
  4. Organize his victory in the election of 2018.
  5. To leave for the time of elections to the resort in China.

Hardly there will be radical changes:

It is unlikely that the changes in Russia will be as spectacular as in Brazil, the Philippines, Peru.
  And just as radical.
  So, it will take a long and tectonic work.

Counter-propaganda, "All to fight against myths,"

Russian Armed Forces are not capable, much weaker, images before their people.
  They carry out - propaganda and political functions.

& nbsp;

Elves against the trolls:

Information war is not a war, it is not violence, it is a "war" in a figurative sense - it is not killed in it.

1. Information warfare is more important than traditional - now.
  Accordingly, the costs of counter-propaganda should be greater than conventional military spending - in democratic countries - now.
  2. Given the already accumulated stockpiles of weapons and the underdevelopment of counter-propaganda tools, then the costs for the latter should be even greater-by an order of magnitude.
  3. Traditional weapons are dangerous for the very existence of civilization - in our time.

Positive ideology:

The weakness of the Kremlin, and the difference from the USSR, is the lack of ideology.
  The Kremlin understands this and works in 3 directions:
  1. "Poison another's cow." - Discredits other ideologies.
  2. It sucks artificial constructions on low instincts, - xenophobia, envy.
  3. Attempts to build a patriarchal-patriotic philosophy :

Pedagogy of the negative:

Like, there are no pure politicians.
  There are no volunteers, - "People will not go to perpetuate the sick for anything."
  "A child can learn only out of fear, not because he likes to learn new things."

"A walking mother-in-law does not believe in a daughter-in-law".
  "A man brought up in that enemies around him will see enemies everywhere."
  "Were you a teacher? And have you become a journalist? "-" What a fall. "

Information war is not violence:

Putin's regime untied it, and he will lose it.

In a properly organized Information War, a lie will lose its truth:
  1. "Elves" - millions against thousands of trolls
  2. Trolls must be paid, Volunteers - volunteers.
  3. Lies can always be exposed, the truth is more difficult to distort.

Libertarian, anti-mythical International:

Xenophobia - state, ethnic, religious - the most dangerous instinct used by dictatorships.
  When anthropogenesis occurred, not just the narrowing of the species by the medium, a person formed a vacuum around himself to the orangutan.

What is more useful or harmful for the survival of a person from genocide, for example, Tasmanians?
  Let's say that the average IQ of Tasmanians was lower than that of white migrants.
  Outstanding start-ups they would not create. However:
  1. Cultural harm from violence and non-tolerance is an order of magnitude greater than the harm caused by the theft of cows by Tasmanians.
  And already in the 19th century there were effective civilized mechanisms to combat theft.
  2. For the survival of the Civilization of the average IQ, the presence of 1 million "botanists" is more important.
  3. Whites from hunger did not die in Tasmania. And now the Earth is able to feed 1 trillion people, not to mention Venus (see Projects: The Greenhouse and Venus)
  4. Migrants already were not inclined to mix much with the locals.
  5. Tasmanians had valuable genes to create in the future resistance to certain diseases. The appearance of a person is already too narrow physiologically.

Ukrainian resource:

The Kremlin may regret that it did not let Ukraine into Europe.
  He caused hostility among millions of Ukrainians.

European volunteers have little to do with Russia.
  Ukraine is connected with Russia like no other:
  1. Millions of Ukrainians live in Primorye, Siberia and the Kuban.
  2. Millions of family ties.
  3. Language communication.

But to defeat Putin, Ukrainians can not so much counter-propaganda as an economic example.

information war between Russia and Estonia

& nbsp;

What for Russia America?:

The best way to retain power after Putin, in 2018, for Russian oligarchs is to "poison a cow" from the United States.

Democratization of the 2nd world is the only way to reduce the threat of nuclear and terrorism for the United States.
  Therefore, the US will have to respond to Information Aggression.

What to do with the resistance of the military-industrial complex?:

1. Technologies of counter-propaganda and weapons are almost the same. - In particular:
  A. Satellites of direct broadcasting.
  B. Laser satellite internet.
  2. Non-lethal means of civilian self-defense, in particular:
  A. Micro-drones with paralyzing needles.
  B. Networking interaction systems.

& nbsp;

Aims and means:

They were confused - always. -
  For example: Communism - Prohibition of private-owned means of production. - A typical means of achieving social equality. And erroneous.
  Even sacred books are full of prescriptions of means acting as self-ends.

The renaissance of religious standards of life was called:
  1. The collapse of the great "scientific" theories, like the Communist,
  2. "Turbulence" of modern civilization, - the destruction of the foundations of the traditional life established by centuries, the destruction of the family, numerous new temptations.

However, ancient religious norms are not suitable for direct application in the current situation.
  Optimal - "revisionism" of them, using the most effective modern methods - scientific.

First, you need to identify the true goals.
  This, for example, lack of mental suffering in people.

From this position, the maximalist desire for equality is not necessary.
  Optimal not even to equate the goal of the 2nd level in the hierarchy of means as goals.
  Nonviolence is a more important goal.

The fact that achieving nonviolence in society - not a utopia - shows significant progress in this regard.
  In just 500 years after the Middle Ages in Europe, violence has declined by an order of magnitude.
  The first factor of this phenomenon, of course, is economic, - improvement of living conditions is also an order of magnitude.
  2nd factor - enlightenment,
  3rd - external political.
  The division of these factors, however, is rather conditional. - they are strongly interdependent.

Virtual parliamentarism:

Closed Circle: For the development of parliamentarism, a change in public consciousness is necessary, and for the change of public consciousness, liberation from "Democratic totalitarianism" is necessary - this vicious circle can be torn in the virtual world. -
  Already, there are many simulation games that simulate political-economic reality very fully.
  On their basis, it is possible to create Internet tools not only of the parallel Network Economy, but also of a parallel society covering all spheres of real life, first real-virtual, and then real-material.

Non-violent right:

Right, laws that are not backed by violence are a completely undeveloped and extremely interesting science.
  State science pretends that it is not and can not be.

Social contract instead of law:

The law is imposed. - I use this term in this sense.

How can the execution of a treaty be supported except by violence?:

1. Mutual failure,
  2. Avoiding,
  3. Fragility of transactions.

Exile:

However, in a real community, a procedure is needed to remove infringers from the Community.
  Desirable - non-violent removal.

& nbsp;

It's not in Putin, but in the people:

It is not difficult to throw Putin off, - 0.5% of US military spending is enough for an information war.
  However, the vacant will immediately take "Putin-2". -
  It is much more difficult to change the "consciousness" of the people.

In vain, Putin was afraid of "losing Ukraine" - Ukrainians only "flounder" what they want to Europe. "They are used to living under authoritarianism." Their consciousness will change soon - for Putin's age will suffice.

The dictator is let the most important, but only one link, only one person of the System.
  Dictators are made by his subordinates.
  Chiefs only give orders, and numerous butchers are ordinary people.

The system needs to be changed simultaneously - above and below. Below - even more important.
  And one of the most effective ways is "parallel."

& nbsp;

Responsibility and the Maidan:

"Maidan" is really dangerous in dictatorial countries. -
  - The revolutions in them are usually bloody.
  And the overwhelming number of victims are peaceful people, not punishers.

But 100% of the blame for this danger lies on the modes themselves. -
  - Only the regimes "build up the dam."

However, this does not absolve the opposition. -
  - You can not allow bloodshed.
  You can not just aim for a "dam."

This complicates the task, and makes the fight even more unequal - Responsible opposition is forced to fight with bound hands.

Limited lustration:

Lustration has to be limited to the isolation of criminals from politics. -
  We have to take care of saving both life and liberty and even money from former thieves and thieves, t:
  1. You can not drive organized crime into a corner.
  2. The criminal grouping is very large. - In dictatorial regimes, the authorities are almost completely "tied up with blood."

Broadcasting and Victims:

Analytical modeling is needed:
  Are the victims possible with direct satellite opposition TV broadcasting.
  Most likely, the gradual decline in the popularity of the regime will only soften it, without a flash of terror from the regime.

& nbsp;

Easy victories, as in Ukraine - exceptions:

True, Ukraine did not have a real victory of democracy. -
  - The ruling group managed to split the opposition:
  - part of the lure,
  - buy part,
  - part, in collusion with the FSB, sent to war,
  - part - to quarrel among themselves.

Democratizing Uzbekistan is easy - by 1.2:

1. Democratize Russia,
  2. ORT, RTR, NTV, REN TV to make constructive, with direct broadcasting to telephones.

& nbsp;

Class factor:

Although the absolutization of the class factor by Marx is incorrect, it may indeed be the most significant - "on average".
  The Ukrainians, like the Russians, are prone to go to extremes, than the propaganda special services use successfully.
  Consider the class factor, of course, necessary.
  - Take into account that the interests of the oligarchs of Ukraine and Russia, which belong to the ruling groups and are closer to each other than to the interests of ordinary people.
  - To take into account the fact that many members of the ruling circles of even democratic countries are not interested in either the Consultative Structure or the Network Economy.
  They support the democracy themselves, perhaps as long as they are at their disposal, as long as there is no alternative to the "end of history" - the existing liberal democracy.

Chauvinism and class solidarity:

Both Russia and Ukraine are characterized by extreme chauvinism. -
  No, "We are Russia", but there is Putin and the ruling group.
  There are We-simple people of Russia and Ukraine, and there are They-the powers that be.
  Even if we chose them, we should have voted for someone.
  We were deceived - with elections. - They are not our representatives. Among them there is none of us.
  And, having unleashed a war, they did not ask us. - This is Their war.

The US State Department should not be touched:

Of course, the State Department also manipulates consciousness.
  But:
  1. In comparison with dictatorships this manipulation is a toy.
  2. Compared to dictatorships, this manipulation almost does not lead to people's suffering.
  3. The structure of the State Department is still fairly transparent and accountable.
  4. It is not optimal to fight on 2 fronts.

The State Department supports the freedom of the Internet, democratization in the countries of the 2nd world, conducts numerous assistance programs.

Capitalism?

(see Errors and the truth of Marx)
  1. Capitalism as such is not dangerous for the survival of the Civilization.
  2. Under democracy, income inequality is small.
  3. Maximizing equality is not optimal and dangerous.

The capitalists - not to expropriate, but - to bankrupt:

If it does not work, then:
  - either there is not enough democracy and freedom,
  - either the network economy is imperfect.

In any case, this is a subordinate and derivative problem. - It is solved on the same path - the elimination of "totalitarian democracy."

& nbsp;

Non-violent right:

It is necessary to develop non-violent law - procedural law, not based on violence.
  It is incomparably more difficult than the traditional one. - The subject of traditional law is only justice and logic, then for non-violent law the main thing is psychology.
  - Ensuring the implementation of norms is based only on the conscience and other psychological properties of a person.

Nonviolent law is adequate to the information age. - It is remote.