Political science. Theories of Democracy - My opinion:
The purpose of this statement is
- the search for unanimous people, and not the development of science, - there is more than enough criticism without me.
True, it is difficult to find scientific, conscientious criticism - there are only trolls on the surface.
Classical liberalism (Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu):
"Human freedom is natural"
- freedom is not written in the sky.
Only instincts are natural: deprivation of freedom of neighbor, robbery and violence.
As, however, freedom, altruism, compassion, friendliness, participation in social problems.
"Natural Rights"
- they do not exist either.
"The social contract is private"
- Objective social contract does not exist either. -
There is a balance of strength or non-violent resistance, persecution and avoidance
As, however, there are instincts of justice, desire to help, and order in the h h in the norms.
And there are agreements developing in the given conditions, including "by default."
"The social contract transfers the state regulation of relations between people"
- it takes as much as it can. The state is initially a team of racketeers.
People were forced to use non-arbitration courts.
However, people preferred not arbitrariness, but a stable unambiguous law-a "contract", "good" "roofers" and judges ..
"Disadvantages of Liberalism: Absolutization of individualism, selfishness, non-compassion, unfriendliness, escape from public, political life."
- Only concrete implementation of Liberalism can absolutize individualism.
Liberalism is also the freedom of altruism, compassion, friendliness - in relation to both the enemies of power; Participation, solidarity in social problems of dependence on power.
The worst Liberalism on the contrary is the absolutization of political life - through violence.
Class model
- Also describes the reality well. - Unity in a group that seizes power helps it dictate a "social contract" - subject to it.
And the freedom to use - unilaterally - to suppress the selfishness of subordinates in relation to themselves, and their participation in political life.
I am for the freedom of the Public Treaty, for independence from the state.
For this, the truth is needed "The Soul-Seeker", which only with the Internet can be ..
Collectivist democracy (J.-J. Rousseau):
& nbsp;
"The state took care of its citizens, fulfilling the common will of the people"
There is no common will of the people.
The state is the instrument of violence - the group that seized power. From what it will take care? - only to preserve power.
"The dictatorship of the majority"
- No, this is still the dictatorship of the minority, - under the pretext of the interests of the majority.
|