Divine works


eng deu рус

Eugenics:

Defective eugenics:

"There is no doubt that if in the United States the law on sterilization would be applied to a greater extent, then in less than 10 years we would eliminate at least 90% of crimes, insanity, dementia, idiocy and sexual perversions, not Speaking of many other forms of defectiveness and degeneration. " (The scientist-eugenic, 1932)
  The eugenic scientist who wrote this is slightly degenerative, and, according to the theory of his colleagues, is subject to forced euthanasia, since he does not understand the elementary complexity of playing the human genome. -
  There are no genes of crime, insanity and perversion.
  If we do not even take into account cultural, educational, and so forth factors, then after sterilization of criminals at least 90% of crimes will be restored, etc.

After the Nazi eugenics, the eugenics found itself under an unwritten ban even in "free" countries.
  But the problem of "negative eugenics" has not gone anywhere, - the rate of human degradation has increased 100 times - now, compared to the former 30,000 years ago.

Science creates problems, but also solves them:

Thank God, scientific and technological revolution, which is the main factor in the humanization of medicine, and it also gives a solution to the problem, genetic medicine.
  - With 100% voluntary application of genetic medicine, the demand for it must be very high.
  There may even be an ironic inversion - the Tasmanians will much more often agree to improve their sex cells than the high-born, closely related-degenerate aristocrats.
  As a result, given the high efficiency of genetic medicine, the descendants of white aristocrats will prove to be incomplete degenerates compared to the descendants of Tasmanians.

The main problem is not ethical, not scientific, but political, -

- democratic, - equal access to genetic medicine for all walks of life.
  We have to work on this problem:
  1. Reduce the cost of genetic medicine,
  2. Eliminate legislative obstacles.
  - Rulers and industrialists-pharmacists are not interested in genetic medicine, and, with the help of very effective propaganda now, set up the public against it.
  Needless to say, it is necessary to improve the quality and reliability of genetic medicine.

Without democratization of genetic medicine, there is a serious danger of a real destruction of the biological homogeneity of humanity, and the allocation of the ruling population of the "immortals."