Divine works


eng deu рус

Advisory structure:

The advisory structure is a mechanism for non-state development of projects:
  • Research,
  • Target, including technical.

Research Priorities and Problems:

• Survival of the Civilization,
  • Prevention of wars, Inter-national, inter-confessional accord, solidarity.
  • Democratization of society, including the avoidance of the impasse of "Managed Democracy", counter-propaganda, anti-lohotron.
  • Elimination of hunger and poverty,
  • Elimination of diseases, including genetic and immortality.

Analogues, history, examples:

Example: "Manhattan Project":
  How did it work ?:
  The US Congress - funded,
  The Minister of Defense defined the departments and appointed their chiefs.
  Heads of departments identified sub-departments and appointed their chiefs, and so on.

Differences between the Manhattan Project and the Consultative Structure:

1. Humanistic orientation, a taboo on military projects.
  2. Openness, absence of "Intellectual Property"
  3. The absence of a human hierarchy,

Hierarchy of goals:

- Problem,
  - Subtasks (sub-problems) of the 2nd level,
  - Subtasks Level 3

Hierarchical structure of knowledge, but not of human organization.

Formation of working groups. Soul Search Engine :

Groups of people are selected - from below, using the Soul-search engine, and not assigned from above

All analytical studies, arguments and proposals are copyright, they do not have authors.
  The soul-searcher analyzes these texts for the sake of spiritual similarity, and groups the authors.
  People communicate with the partners suggested by them for fruitful cooperation.
  Developers of the Soul-search engine adjust it based on this communication.

Soul-Search Engine:

There are different versions of the Soul-search engine - from different groups of developers.
  People choose Soul-search engines, - considering:
  - Usage statistics,
  - feedback and characteristics of those who respond, and
  - self-advertising.

The soul-searcher, by the way, should be the 1st task-project.

Self-selection of employees:

People choose their own partner-partners for suggestions to the Soul-search engines
  There are no working groups as a limited number of people.
  Working groups are working-class groups.
  Each participant has his own group.
  He himself determines with whom he should cooperate.
  The 1st factor, the reason for this is anti-trolling.
  The 1st reason for the ineffectiveness of the Forums is the activity of state trolls on them.

The destructive factor from insults is greater than the possible loss of valuable ideas and data.
  The FSB has formed a culture of insults, so the principle of automatic disconnection of the impolite is optimal.
  If a person is above ambition, then he will be polite.

"Natural selection" of performance:

Most of the communication is unproductive, sterile.
  But there is a mechanism for "natural selection" of effectiveness:
  1. Structure of the results.
  She:
  - Hierarchical. - For scientific basis, scientific cataloging is taken.
  - Multivariable,
  2. Using results, citing
  For example: Project Soul-search engine.
  The criterion of the effectiveness of a particular version of it is its popularity.

Self-selection of employees on average - less efficient appointment of employees.
  But he will give better results.
  The decisive factor is not the average result, but the best one.

Due to what self-selection of employees is more effective:

1. Mass - billions of employees.
  2. "Internet factor" - increasing the efficiency of information processing by many orders.
  3. The factor of freedom. In the work he is very heavy.
  4. Anti-troll protection.

Taboo:

Military taboo:

Development prohibited:

- The means of killing people,
  - Means of violence for violent-power organizations, including countries.
  - Propagandistic-anti-democratic means.

In general, the bans in the Advisory Structure are single, exclusive.

Development allowed:

- Non-lethal means of civil self-defense, including networked micro-drones firing paralyzing needles.

& nbsp;

Positive orientation - instead of prohibitions:

Orientation to create more efficient free mechanisms and Internet tools instead of prohibiting.

& nbsp;

Financing:

Most of the development is free.
  The orientation of the mechanism is on the pleasure of the development and research itself, in spite of its usefulness, meaning, beauty.

Donations instead of order:

Order development - no.
  But there is:
  • Donations,
  • Problem system

Donations:

1. By results.
  The mechanism is focused on an independent developer from financing.
  The developer does what he thinks is right.
  And the community supports it so that it is independent.
  2. Distribution itself is engaged in the Community.
  The first criterion of distribution is the effectiveness of not the particular developer, but of the whole System.
  For this, it is optimal to support poor developers.

Order prohibition is not even necessary
  - There are competing ordering platforms - freelance, for example.
  - There are "moral", ideological, persuasive products,

Problem System :

is a hierarchical Database of problems.
  More precisely, this database is configured by its user, - by the criteria:
  - The spiritual similarity of authors who bring problems,
  - Subjective importance of problems,
  -

Properties Problems on the List:

- Revealed, have links,
  - Have cross-connections.
  - Hierarchical for the solution, t e are subordinate: To solve this problem, you need to solve other problems.
  - Hierarchical in importance.

Self-recording of Problems in the Database:

There are no responsible moderators, censors for including problems in the Base.
  A problem can be entered by any person.
  But:
  One of the criteria for setting up the database view by the user is the rating of the person who made the offer.

View criteria mechanism:

- also self-configurable and has many versions.

The ratings of the participants also have:

- many features and
  - many versions.

& nbsp;

Copyright in place of Intellectual Property:

The source is the GNU concept.

& nbsp;

Projects of the Consultative Structure:

1. Self-organization of the Advisory Structure
  2. Soul-search engine
  3. Democratization

These projects are not consistent, but the first Projects start earlier and create a basis for the subsequent projects.

3rd project - Democratization :

It simultaneously, to a great extent, solves also other problems:
  • Survival of Civilization,
  • Preventing wars,
  • Elimination of hunger and poverty,

1. Streamlining and maximum simplification of information.

& nbsp;

2. To reach the maximum consensus of the majority of participants on the following issues:

1. What do we want?
  2. How to achieve? - 10 steps.
  Only non-violent ways are considered.

3. To work out a very simple and clear exposition:

1. What kind of society do we need ?:
  • Analogues: How similar societies work in the West.
  • Justification of the viciousness of other options and the optimality of the chosen one.
  • What we will have - modeling: Income, health, roads, etc.
  2. How to reach the goal?
  Parallel elections and m

4. Counter-propaganda, Anti-scam.
5. Multiple parallelism:

The advisory structure is adequate to the Internet and in principle Multiple parallelism. - As the Internet does not have fixed ways of transferring information, the Advisory Structure does not have fixed "parallel" structures.