Divine works


eng deu рус

"Advisory structure"

is a project of a civil society of political-economic analysis.

Idea:

The government, for example, Ukraine is not interested in effective search for effective solutions to social problems.
  In Western countries, however, the problems are of a completely different kind.

The best way out of the vicious circle, for example, Ukraine lies through - alternative social science
  The problem of Ukraine is complicated - an analytical structure should be ahead of politics - non-governmental.

It is necessary to start - with the self-organization of such a public advisory structure:
  1. Copying official scientific institutions is not optimal:
  1.1. Their structure is "imprisoned" for the interests of the state that finances them,
  1.2. A goal-consistent structure should be much more democratic - allowing anyone to participate - without ranks and barriers.
  2. Existing public discussion structures are ineffective:
  2.1. Party analytical centers are over-engaged. They also work for the interests of their funding groups.
  The governing structures of even the most democratic Western trade unions have their own - bureaucratic interests. To hope for the representation of popular interests by any group in the country of the second world is utopia.
  2.2. Different talk shows are propaganda performances.
  In addition, their organization is completely ineffective until an empty air shake.

The way out is to expand the multiplicity of forms of structures and their political competition.
  And also - in the conscious creation of the most effective structures.

There are, however, groups that are interested in broad popular representation, and who do not have direct interests in Ukraine. - This is, for example, Google. Her interests:
  1. Broad public participation,
  2. Increasing the solvency of advertising-recipients.

Difference of the present:
  1. Worldwide breadth of organizations, "Internationale", and,
  2. Inseparability of them from IT-technologies, especially the Internet.

& nbsp;

The unreasonable Ukrainians first choose their president, then themselves revolt against him.
  It is clear:
  1. Historical "mentality." - Used to be slaves, from whom nothing depends, and to achieve something just a riot.
  Examples of analogs:
  A. Eagle trained for hunting does not fly away, although it is able to feed itself.
  B. 1861. Anecdotes about serfs who do not understand the new laws and try to serve the master in the old manner.
  2. Historical disorganization. - Ukrainians do not know how to independently organize the nomination of candidates, or an independent trade union.

Use the irrationality of former slaves - rogues.
  Creepy cynics - will prolate into power.
  Journalists only expose for circulation, not offering anything constructive.
  The weakness of the program of the genial unmasker of Navalny causes suspicion - in Russia the authorities are very seductive.
  Ananitics, pardon, analysts are fruitless, limited for some reason to analysis, leaving decision-making to their superiors.
  Although it should be the other way around. - The president's administration should be isolated from decision-making.
  It is clear, - analysts pay - chiefs, and limit legislatively.
  Now analysts are more harmed - they are working for the enemy.

But now, in the Internet age, a 100% democratic parallel "Advisory structure" may be more effective than the ancient hierarchical structure.
  Isolate from finance administration must be civilized - competition.
  Power and money are intertwined.
  Lustrate no one is necessary, punish is not necessary, attack - more expensive. -
  - Optimal - to deprive property, but not expropriation.

Prohibit Deny:

And this restriction is limited.
  The main difference between Russia and Ukraine is the permissive economy instead of the punitive one.
  The moratorium on inspections of small enterprises is also a scam.
  It is more effective and, incidentally, safer for the population - on the contrary, - to allow checks, but to forbid the license.

The corrupt guy steals on the dollar, and at 10 - shits.
  Corruption is not bribery, but abuse of power.
  Bribery is only its manifestation.

All state companies against corruption are a cynical, demagogic scam.
  Like statements in its ineradicability like prostitution.
  Eliminating the personal gain of the authorities will kill corruption by 100%.
  In Sweden, they do not cling to power, because there is little personal gain from power.
  Europe was integrated - due to the reduction of power in the countries. -
  - Supervise the observance of human rights, and so on, and more effectively - supranational and civil institutions.
  The Ukrainian authorities are objectively not interested in integrating into Europe, and will cooperate with the Kremlin's special services with the aim of effectively scrounging the people for this.

The vicious circle. -

In Ukraine, spend a lot of money for the deputy because it is highly-profitable.
  A high price eliminates the democratic nature of nominating candidates.

Necessity of 100 years of development to Sweden is also a scam.
  Everything is simpler. - only the elimination of absolutism, the demonopolization of power is needed.

To forbid to forbid is means to forbid a monopoly of the power.
  And demonopolisation of power is the lack of power. - Power is violence against the people.
  The lack of power is democracy.

& nbsp;

"Devil", more precisely, the Kremlin's special services are fantastically clever. -
  "They ruined the USSR very timely." - The Soviet Union existed for another 10 years, the Internet would appear, and the "Advisory structure" could be created.
  And so, in 1990, I had to unsuccessfully try to create it on the basis of mail.
  And if we do not create the "Consultative Structure" now, then the Earth Civilization will be doomed to a historical impasse.
  And the "flower" of Our universe will fade. -
  Earth is unique (see Theory of the Uniqueness of the Earth).
  - The maximum probability of a single-earth universe, more precisely, the universe in which Civilization has reached the "divine" level - is unique, not the multiplicity of equal worlds.
  And Google's empty universes will disappear in vain. - By our stupidity.
  The time of luck with the fine tuning of the universe is over.
  Now it's our turn, or special services.

The Soviet Union was not an evil empire,

Russia only becomes it now
  For the Kremlin's special services, Satanism is objectively profitable.
  - Totalitarian "democracy" is stable not so much by propaganda as by special Russian spirituality.
  Not only spontaneously the Russians over the past 30 years have developed cynicism, a cult of force, heartlessness, spiritual sadism even in relation to their own children.

And the Russian plague is contagious.

Already now the experience of the Kremlin adopts the administration of Central Asia, Syria, China.
  Even some European politicians are cooperating with the FSB in using political technologies.

Moreover, it's easier to fool the American people than to work out a program for the American elite that will convince it.

Ukrainians - for Russians:

The enemy of Ukrainians and Russians is common, this is the enemy of mankind.
  It is necessary to fight Ukrainians not against Russians, but for Russians, for "God."
  And to fight not with weapons, but with a word, - in social networks against frenzied trolls.

"Consultative structure" vs security:

"Consultative structure" - an organization for this is more effective than the GRU.
  The Kremlin has started a hybrid war, and it will lose it.
  More precisely, the outcome depends on us.
  There comes the time of "singularity" - political first.

& nbsp;

The most effective in this situation is civilian self-analysis.
  1. Involving a former slave in a structure in which it will be convenient for him to analyze his new situation and his capabilities.
  2. Independent analysis and development of solutions instead of its objective enemy - the presidential administration. -
  - It is easier to analyze and solve it independently than to force the administration to work for oneself to harm.

Starting self-organization is most effective - from organizing self-analysis.
  - The idea is simple, but not obvious and not clear to everyone.
  Therefore, those who understand its necessity should start the "Consultative Structure".
  Therefore, it is necessary to begin - with the search for such people.

Democracy without a civilian analytical structure degenerates into a manipulative managed democracy.
"Do not trust, do not fear, do not ask". - Other relations with the leaders in the former USSR are useless and dangerous. - The disease can develop into a chronic one. - Chiefs improve political technology - until the complete control of history.
  - Already now they are fighting against slaves by their own hands. - According to the principle "A fool does not need a knife."

"Advisory structure" against democracy:

Democracy is a sharing of power.
  Democracy is focused on finding a compromise - between people.

The "consultative structure" is focused on finding solutions.
  Democracy is also looking for compromise solutions, but, from the very beginning, and at each stage it proceeds with their interests of groups of people - in the debates of party factions in parliament, in the representation and influence of parties in the government.

In the "Consultative structure" there is a selection of not people, but - decisions.
  At first, freely formed groups develop effective and deeply justified decisions, and only then these decisions compete among themselves in the old democratic mechanism.

That is, the "Advisory structure" does not replace democracy, but basically supplements and improves it.

Democracy is also power.
  Power is coercion to anything else. Let the minority, but - to people.
  In the "Advisory structure", nothing is imposed on anyone.

More effective solutions, moreover, in real time - will smooth the contradictions between people, and their adoption will be closer to consensus, and not to compromise.
  Coercion, power will be needed - less.

"Advisory structure" is the most secure form of government in the 21st century:

1. Democracy is imperfect.
  2. But all other forms of government are even worse.
  3. In the 21st century, democracy is dangerous by degeneration, manipulation.
  4. Democracy can be improved and safer.
  5. "Consultative structure" - this is the form of government devoid of shortcomings in democracy.

The management of the company must be adequate to the technological level of the society:

- Not so much in terms of using technology, but - matching the complexity of technology.
  - Water management was sufficient to manage agriculture.
  To manage the development of self-reproduction of mining complexes on Mercury, a more complex organization is needed.

& nbsp;

Than to deal with the "Advisory structure"?

1. Lawmaking:

Search for factors that reduce earnings that generate corruption, inefficiency of the economy.
  Comparative analysis of the economic legislation of Ukraine and the Baltic countries, for example.

Hypothesis: Demonetization of power up to the liquidation of the executive power.

Power should not be profitable in person.

Hypothesis: The punitive legislation instead of the permissive one.

No one orders, only negotiates - by agreement.
  All power - local councils. Only human rights are global.

Hypothesis: Donations to legislators until the liquidation of the legislature:

Elimination of the salaries of deputies. - The electorate votes for initiators-competitors with money.
  Legislative amendments win in the "Advisory structure", - informal structure.

2. Promoting Programs:

The mechanisms of solidarity in general, in which consensus is possible, while preserving the multiplicity - to implement the "Consultative Structure" common in the proposals of different branches.
  Likbez with the help of mass involvement in an organized dispute.
  Explaining the benefits of freedoms for a common man, for example.

3. The same as the Administration of the President:

Example: Developing an alternative country budget:

In Ukraine, for example, the parliament, in the first place, dependent, in 2, the class is homogeneous, - places are bought, in 3, nothing develops itself.

Students can do their diploma and coursework as they did, but are less detached from life. - Their diploma and coursework occupy the cells of a real system that works more efficiently than the Presidential Administration.

Network production. Start:

Why are collective farms not real?:

If the workers do not want to give profit to the owner, then why do not they organize their enterprise, and do not divide the profits among themselves? -
  - The answer, - Do not know how.
  They know how to hire.
  If someone is able to organize production, then he prefers to profit by appropriating himself.

What is changing the Network production, - Free Internet franchising?

It simplifies the organization of production.
  Just as Wikipedia concentrates on information, Knowledge of how to organize production is concentrated in Network Production.

What is the best way to start Ukrainians?:

1. 1st participant of the collective farm to register in Germany on a business visa.
  2. Register an enterprise in Germany.
  3. Organize production
  4. Invite the remaining Ukrainians.

The export option, - produced on the territory of Ukraine and exported to Gourmania, - is less preferable, t to Germany will quickly increase duties.
  More precisely, the intermediate version is optimal, - To import those components that are profitable to Germany.

& nbsp;

Happiness is, first of all, the absence of unhappiness.

It's amazing how many seemingly smart and seemingly not mean people are concerned about the "positive" - ​​improving society and so forth, but almost no one is reducing the growing risks, the biggest of which is the risk of totalitarian democracy.

"Only Viny did not boo," say the wise Ukrainians.
  - Everything is formed gradually, we do not die from hunger. The main thing now is to avoid the plague of the 21st century - Managed "democracy."

& nbsp;

1. Governmental analytical structures are ineffective, if not to say - useless - in matters of corruption, poverty, etc., because they are not interested, if not to say, are interested in the opposite. Especially in Ukraine.
  On the other hand:
  1.1. Society itself - highly educated - now, in the same Ukraine.
  1.2. Internet now, - tools for highly effective self-organization are possible.

2. Analysis is the most effective thing. -
  - It is more effective than any political actions, work, demands.
  If not to say - actions without preliminary analysis can give the opposite result.
  Any political action, work must be preceded by a profound analysis - by virtue of its complexity - much more than in any narrowly professional activity.
  - It's not for nothing that political economy is the most undeveloped science - only all Nobel laureates are mistaken in it.

In Ukraine, how not to seize the government - there will be no sense - the better, the more professional the government, the worse, because it is in Ukraine that such conditions exist that the interests of the government and the people are opposite.
  The "Consultative Structure" for Ukraine is the only effective way out.

Expropriation of expropriators:

It is implied, usually, - the withdrawal of means of production - from large owners.
  But the proletarians will not be able to dispose of them.
  - Large owners therefore became such that they managed to effectively manage and accumulate means of production.

It is also meant, - the transfer of the selected means of production to the state.
  But officials, moreover, will not be able to competently dispose of the means of production. -
  Example: the 1st factor of the fall of communism in Russia - the fastening of suppliers for buyers - from the Center.

Social democracy is more effective:

Social democracy went on a more efficient path - progressive taxation of large owners.
  - Despite the skepticism of the Communists, democracy worked in the 20th century.
  But in the 21st century, political technologies and propaganda were improved.
  Now large owners can again change the redistribution of incomes in their favor - quite democratically.
  Example: The same Russia.

Lobbyism is dangerous:

The state, officials will always be on the side of those who can give more money, and not necessarily illegally.
  - Volumes of election campaign financing and m - in the US are much larger than the market of bribes in Russia.

"Advisory structure":

The way out of the impasse - there is only one, - self-organization, and first of all - information.
  - To develop and use the latest technologies.
  This is the idea of ​​the "Advisory structure."

"Divine Enterprise":

In addition to political self-organization, IT-technologies make real and effective self-organization - economic.
  - This is already the idea of ​​"Network Economy", "Divine Enterprise". -
  "Ownership remains with the owners, but the efficiency of small owners increases, through the supply chain between them, with the help of a global information network."

Proletarians possess the main property - intellect.
  It does not take away, despite attempts to create unnatural "Intellectual Property."

& nbsp;

At least the Kremlin has no moral right to fight against IP.
  - The average moral level of the chiefs of Russia is incomparably lower than the successors of IP.

& nbsp;

& nbsp;

Multi-mode:

For example, a person can choose modes:
  Or: Only those he chooses to see his replies + He sees replicas of only those whom he chose
  Or: His replicas are seen by everyone + He sees replicas of only those whom he chooses
  Or: Only those he chooses to see his replies + He sees replicas of all

There may be many other variants between these options.

"Friends" circle modes:

& nbsp;

& nbsp;

& nbsp;

100% anarchy + 0% chaos:

Anarchy

= lack of power = lack of anything to be solved by anyone other than the person.
  That is, the Advisory structure is 100% flexible. - It allows the person himself to 100% customize his communication, leaving nothing fixed in the structure itself.

0% chaos = 100% organization:

1. Man gets the most productive communication. -
  - He does not see a replica of those who do not need him, and his replica is not seen by those who should not see them.
  In this case, this selection is configured only by himself.

2. Project-Oriented:
  In this the Advisory structure is similar to Wikipedia, in which the exchange of replicas, arguments is secondary, is a tool, and primarily - the creation of a common outcome document.

An example of chaos is "Forums", comments.
  - they are 100% "bird market."
  Even social networks were created for the purpose of not achieving results, but - the maximum size of the audience, on which advertising it is possible to earn.
  This explains their chaotic nature.
  "Professional Forum" is nonsense. - The forum can not be professional by definition, and professionals can not cast beads on forums.

For the same reason, the Advisory structure is a low-cost and not massive project. It should be created by volunteers.