Divine works

eng

Consultative structure. Start-topic:

Perhaps the Consultative Structure in 1990 did not arouse interest, but to the only topic I suggested was self-organization.
  But self-organization can not be an end in itself. -
  - Activists did not see - than a tool that is not even clearly stated, can be better than others.
  I deliberately did not offer a specific tool, but only outlined the subject area - directly public analysis and the development of social institutions.

My idea was in the "iteration" - using the tool to improve the tool itself, improve its efficiency.

My Errors:

1. The effectiveness of the tool should be checked from the very beginning on applications.
  2. It is necessary to offer a workable, and not abstract, "seed",
  3. Motivation of the participants: The topic most interested in the potential participants is needed.
  I suggest as the Start-up topic now - the following:

Start-topic: How to increase incomes for Ukrainians?

The "seed" theses:

Optimal way: Foreign, in particular, German direct investment:

Direct - in the sense without the mediation of the state.
  But for investments, a guarantee is required for the withdrawal of profits and capital.
  The existing legal field of Ukraine does not provide such a guarantee:
  The threat of a raid, first of all - state, racket, the corruption of the court and law enforcement agencies, ambiguity and instability of the law.

Optimal Solution: Local Self Defense:

Game of interests:
  Now there is an equilibrium:
  Ukrainian state racketeers are weak now.
  Ukrainian workers are not interested in "expropriation", but in long-term work and in technologies.
  German investors are not interested in violating international and European declarations - the ILO, environmental, technological.
  Investors are also interested in selling products in Europe. This will reduce protectionist risks.

The situation is similar to the US civil war times, before the industrial boom of the 1880s.
- With the declaration of the priority of legality, the recognition of the Bill of Rights and Freedoms, local independent civil courts, elected sheriffs.

The situation is even better:

Foreign - European investors were much less then,
  The movement of technology was more difficult, before - information.
The means of localization of organized state terrorism and equality with the presidents were less effective - Colt and Winchester.   - Less effective first of all - politically - due to the lethality of the latter.
  Now cheap networks of non-lethal micro-missiles are possible.
  Networks - in the sense of interaction of participants in real time - through micro-satellites.

Self-organization of the "Advisory Structure" - 4:

The "seed" structure of the "Advisory structure" was set out in 2016.
  I propose to optimize in parallel:
  1. Self-organization,
  2. The "Consultative Structure" itself, and
  3. Start-topic.

Monetary Bait:

In 1990, I proposed a start-topic - Self-organization of the "Advisory Structure".
But russian abstractions do not understand. - They understand only "bucks" (dollars) here and now.
It is more effective, apparently, to set the start-topic "How to increase revenues", and when "peck", to argue the need and effectiveness of the means - self-organization.

2nd version of the start-topic: "Europeanization of Ukraine must begin with the electoral system".

End of Monographs:

So far, the process of scientific creativity was:
The scientist studied a certain question, analyzed, maybe even experimented, put forward hypotheses - only for himself, built theories, and only then exposed them to the court of colleagues.

Now:
The dilettante was inspired by the hypothesis - he immediately shares it - on the principle of "Brainstorming" - with his "Circle" of friends.

The irony is that the collective creativity, in an effective information environment and with the same tools, will yield more professional results than a single scientist.
  In the intellectual information system, the knowledge that the scientist collected from hundreds of sources is depreciated.
  The first factor is the effectiveness of ideas, more precisely - a structure that will allow people to interact:
  • Friendly, positive - with an outcome orientation, not a "drowning", with the identification of opportunities, not causes,
  • With their chosen ones - currently opponents.

Of course, 99% of the ideas of amateurs will be fruitless.
But the useful ideas of even the most ignorant amateurs will not get lost, but they will reach - through chains of "circles" - to more educated developers.
After all, any two people associate 5 handshakes.

In addition, the "compulsory" education = propagandistic mental mutilation of children, under pain of criminal prosecution, will become unnecessary, since the "Industrial Training" of the "Consultative Structure" makes children and amateurs incomparably better - without any tests, examinations and coercion. > - While their degrading professors will be low-productive and far-fetched - in their own juice to search for answers in libraries, - curious amateurs will get system knowledge instantly - through structure.

2016

2017