Divine works


eng deu рус

Crowd Creator:

This is an amateur social organization project on technical and other developments.

The idea of ​​the organization:

Crowd creator is a network of mutual assistance of independent groups of developers.
  This is the development of rules that encourage mutual assistance instead of competition.
  Lovers generally focus more on hobbies than on commerce or careers.
  Crowd-creator is, above all, information mutual assistance. Creation of a convenient intellectual Knowledge base. The traditional system of scientific articles and grants is very inconvenient and unfriendly. - Every scientist cares about himself.
  This, in particular, is mutual assistance in the search for investors.

The Internet makes network development and network production not just a competitive, but - a potential monopoly, more precisely, an anti-monopoly. - Traditional organizational and legal forms will simply wither away.
  The word "network" - here reflects not so much the Internet-based work as a network organization, - horizontal, one-rank.

"Executors", "Responsible" in the proposed network does not exist, - everyone takes responsibility for themselves.
  "Orders" have a historical reason, but the Internet has a different mechanism:
  Any participant can raise problems and questions.
  Any participant can solve them.

The Internet makes it possible to create an intelligent Knowledge Base, the organization of this process, in which participants do not need to spend work and time searching, in which the solution of problems occurs in a "friendly" convenient environment that provides all sorts of unobtrusive customizable service and tips. >   For example, the service helps to raise the problem, - to formalize it, structure it, - to identify factors, to build into the hierarchical network of interrelated factors.

Each questioner easily finds the responders, and vice versa.
  More precisely, they find not so much people as a place in the structure that can be developed.

The question-and-answer service has already appeared, for example, Google-answer.
  However, this service does not have a service at all, and Google search engine does not have intelligence at all.

Psychology is more important than economics:

Psychological and economic research is needed on the pleasure of work.
  Traditionally, employers do not attach importance to the pleasure of subordinate employees.
  - They pay, and the pleasure of execution is the problem of the performer.
  - No problems. - "With my own hand", the interested - in modern conditions, the study will be more effective.
  1. In modern "rich" countries, there is enough salary for life, it's time to think about pleasure, in a simplistic, but adequate manner.
  Competition is moving out of competition for wages in competition for pleasure.
  2. The Internet and other attributes of modern life provide more and more opportunities to make the work pleasant:
  + Growing - Job Selection,
  + Growing - Variety of it
  + Growing - The possibility of changing the types of work even within one "work."

Universal rating:

The most effective solutions will be identified primarily - not economically.
  Despite the unscrupulous nature of man, the competitors of the parallel branches will be assessed objectively enough - if the economic interest is insignificant.

Free work:

The Internet is able to make work on the development of the most enjoyable, including, since it can be mostly free.
  Creativity is pleasant, but with good organization, that is, with good software (software), it can be pure pleasure, since software can eliminate all unpleasant moments:
  - Assignments,
  - Work control,
  - Obligation,
  Closedness of information. - It is the repeated routine that makes the work unpleasant.

Cash help :

Generally, the work will not be free.
  People will get pleasure from work, and for fun it's also money!
  But the main criterion of monetary assistance will not be labor, and not results, but - needs.
  The community will benefit from helping talented poor members, including those from the Third World, so that they will not be distracted by the "daily bread".
  Good software can make it convenient to collectively develop solutions not only for research costs, but also for monetary assistance.

Fans vs "Professionals":

Good software is the main factor of "professionalism".
  With its help, the quality of the results of amateurs must surpass that of "professionals", due to the "transition of quantity to quality." -
  The average performance of the amateurs will be very inferior to the professional ones, but the result is the best results.
  And they will be better, since fans are many orders of magnitude greater.

However, the main factor of the superiority of the amateur business over the professional is not the software itself and the Internet itself, but their interaction with a non-hierarchical organization.
  In development, the traditional hierarchy has no chance against a network organization.
  At the same time, however, traditional records management is not only not wiped out - it will be improved.

Freedom of Labor:

The main factor that reduces the pleasure of work is its commitment. -
  "It's not the worker who decides what to do, his boss."

In general, the main principle and advantage of the Network economy, - increasing efficiency -
  - NOT through limitations, but through empowerment.
  The main factor that expands the possibilities is almost unlimited are new information technologies.

Speaking specifically, software can now be created that allows not the employee to adjust to the market, but, on the contrary, to find the place of demand for any, momentary desire of the person, in which bottlenecks - the brakes of the economy - labor mediators, - chiefs, - Are not needed at all.

Without machine:

Marx was mistaken. - Threat to mankind is not capitalism, but the apparatus of government.
  Hidden propaganda of professionalism is conducted with the purpose of justifying the need for an apparatus.
  However, the Internet cancels the device. Not only the party apparatus, but also management in industry as a less efficient network, one-ranked economy.

Hybrid economy - professional amateur:

In fact, there will not be an opposition between Lovers vs "Professionals", but - "the golden mean" - Work is mainly not for money, but -
  + For the love of the work,
  + For the meaning of the case,
  + For "business patriotism."

100% openness is efficiency, reliability and quality:

The complexity of development is increasing.
  Traditionally, complex systems are developed by departments.
  Each department is responsible for their product, determined by the boss.

Open development, with subject subdivisions and hierarchy - instead of human-administrative, - must be effective and qualitative. -
  - The relationship and the relationship between subject subsections-factors - objective, not artificial. -
  - Optimal schemes and design-economic topologies are formed, cumulative interaction-coordination of numerous subsections will yield multiple efficiency gains.

Careful "licking" - not by one responsible person, but - open to the whole world - of all parts - will ensure unprecedented quality of the product.

Order instead of handicraft:

Despite the support for freedom and the multiplicity of forms, other than forcible ones, one should be guided - by priority ordering components and parts - in factories - instead of garages and kitchens.
  It is necessary to take the best from state production, and not to go to the other extreme.
  - "Natural" pilot production - production by own strength, even in large design bureaus (design bureaus) takes a small share.
  Another issue - state planning - is the attachment of the Center-KB to specific manufacturers.

The share of "material" manufacturing in the cost of complex new developments is less than 50%.
  More weight is the optimality of design decisions.
  Therefore, it is necessary to concentrate on developments.

"Network production" instead of handicraft:

It is necessary to concentrate on the use of industrial equipment, but at the same time develop the entire parallel independent-organizational spectrum.
  1. Remote rental of remote equipment in companies around the world. - Of the millions of plants - a couple or three thousand will agree.
  2. Work through participating representatives in liberal countries.
  3. Group, including remote use of equipment from owner-participants.
  4. Group purchase of equipment for the previous paragraph.
  In developed countries even centers appear that specialize only in providing equipment to start-ups.
  Similar Centers can be created within the framework of this Project.

The modern variety of information opportunities will remove the problems of agreements and their implementation, and, most importantly, will allow to abandon the services of violence - the mediator-state.

& nbsp;

Without kustarshchiny - as a state
  Combine + -s with + -s

An example of coordination of factors - engineering and economic approach

& nbsp;

Network production:

- similar to network development.

How it works. On the example of the Rockets:

Handicraft, "garage" manufacturing is not enough, - from the very beginning.
  After a comprehensive theoretical "break-in", and numerical simulation, experimental parts are ordered in factories at once with a small series. -
  These details are sent to parallel groups of experimenters - all over the world.
  With the approach to commercialization, manufacturing is gradually moving to factories, and the size of the series is increasing.
  "Commercialization" is also fundamentally different from the classical one. -
  Production is actually at the factory cost. -
  Almost no surcharge on research payback and "copyright", which in pharmaceuticals, for example, account for many thousands of percent of the price.
  This is the main competitive advantage of the "Network" form of production.

Theoretical "break-in" will be effective due to the "advisory" structure of Crowd Creator, including him:
  + 100% open,
  + The most efficient and convenient decomposition "on the shelves", in which the participants are interested and which they themselves create,
  + Semantic assistance to artificial intelligence, which is also created by the members of the Community themselves.

Developments are more important than production:

The emphasis is not on production, but on developments, as:
  1. The share in the cost of development exceeds that of production.
  2. "Networked economy" is more effective - for development.
  3. Developments and solutions are more important for Policies .

Uber-analog:

Uber-taxi is a very small special case of Network Production, which I started to offer back in the 1990s.
  "Network production" is a radical reduction of organizational costs, inertia, monopoly of "narrow bottlenecks" - by increasing the quality of information usage and its accessibility on the Web.

Politics :

The reason for "Crowd Creator" is not "amateur patriotism," but politics.
  The more professional political technologists are more professional, the more dangerous they are for the future of society.
  The "advisory structure" must first be worked out of politics.
  At the same time, crow-creator is efficient and purely economical.
  Otherwise, the "shield and sword" will develop simultaneously and ineffectively.

By professionals I mean recipients of orders not only from the state, but also from the oligarchs.
  100% openly public definition of cash assistance is not only realistic, but also politically-optimal orientation to help in doing business, especially - poor participants.

>

A special social danger is the use of the hierarchy of Artificial Intelligence. - In this - the only possibility of its competitiveness and survival.
  That is why the improvement of Crowd creator should occur mainly in the economy.

Principles of pleasant work:

• There is no hierarchy of people.
  Relationships are only one-rank and horizontal.
  • There are no instructions and execution.
  • There is no imposition of anything to anyone - the majority.
  • All work is done only at will.
  • No one can decide anything for anyone, or impose.
  • 100% -uniqueness and clarity. Simplicity.

Software for the portal:

The first development should be the creation of software for the portal into the future, which should allow:

• Create a multiple parallel hierarchy of questions (factors, problems),
  That is, the ability to insert parallel branches.
  Each participant configures himself - with which parallel branches he works.
  More precisely, the participant tunes branches not from scratch, but gets them from the "circle" of like-minded people that he chooses.
  However, a participant can see and select any other branches, and show their configuration to like-minded people.

• Give answers (calculations, arguments) - by any participant - on the questions that can be patrolled in the "circle" of like-minded people - according to the mechanism of Wikipedia.
  Including the ability to insert links to parallel branches.
  The software can be used as a basis for the Wikipedia engine.

• Exclude any participant from any other participant from communicating, namely:
  That is, each participant has, as it were, a right of veto. -
  - Pages are automatically paralleled so that other participants do not see the excluded and excluded on one page.
  This possibility is necessary, since the main factors that de-motivate, interfere with the liberated "brainstorming", and create information beyond the minimum necessary - are:
  - Trolling,
  - Insults,
  - Spam, flood, etc.

• The ranking of participants is like-minded for a variety of parallel properties.
  Any member can set up a rating account to display the information that he sees.

• Semi-automatic weighting of factors and sub-factors.

• Ability to establish a relationship of factors.

• Automatic construction of a network of factors.

"Croud-Creator" is a combination of advantages:

• Clan, - a discussion in a narrow circle of understanding each other, and
  • Unlimited wide discussion,

• Brainstorm without insults, and
  • Full criticism.

& quot; + & quot; "Croud-Creator" is more efficient than hierarchical corporate and bureaucratic R & D organizations, and should replace them.

& nbsp;

"Croud-Creator" - a guarantee of success:

"Croud-Creator" for the first time can reduce risks to almost zero, and turn any business just into an exciting journey.

Distributed Research:

Crowd Creator + Internet will allow to unite the efforts of the disparate groups.
  The meaning of "Croud-Creator" - in the choice of employees - from below, more precisely - horizontal.
  This will make the work more efficient, due to the competition of freely formed groups, and pleasant = free.

Remote wide participation:

Will help criticism, numerical modeling, replacing fire tests, legal assistance, lobbying in the West, expanding the circle of participants, etc.

The work in the community and the modeling will greatly reduce the experiments.