Divine works


eng deu рус

"Advisory structure":

Objectives of the "Advisory Structure":

Conflict reconciliation of multiple meanings of life, their systemic nature - the goal of the "Advisory structure."

The development of culture is one of the goals of the "Advisory structure":

One of the objectives of the "Advisory structure" is the development of a culture that provides stable development, of which the "Advisory structure" itself is not part of any group's manipulation.

"Consultative structure" is the democratic elitism of ideas, not of people.
  This is not democratic centralism. This is a complete lack of centralism.

Zashhorennye philosophers:

In man, culture replaces instincts. Not reason, but culture.
  The whole problem is that the special services of Russia for the first time in history scientifically and knowingly create a "satanic" culture.

At the same time, all philosophers continue to speculate on social justice, on gender and ecology, on technology and Islamism. -
  - All this is not relevant. - Civilization is in danger right now. And these are not asteroids or volcanoes. This is "Managed democracy."

The idea of ​​the "advisory structure" and "network economy":

"Enlightenment" is ineffective.
  Ordinary elections are also ineffective, moreover, they are dangerous. -
  - For whom the man in the street did not vote - the policy of the government does not change.
  This brings to the scene extremists such as Trump, who are also ineffective, because they are sabotaged by their apparatus and class, and do not interact with their constituents.
  The danger is in the mind of extremists who monopolize power.

The most efficient way:

- creating parallel structures that are more efficient than the state.
  The competition of not just candidates within one system, but - systems - will make the state itself more efficient.

2nd idea: Western debugging:

The dictatorships of the 2nd world are more in need of demonopolization of political systems.
  However, the most effective way is to "debug" the "Advisory structure" and the "Network Economy" in the 1st world and in Ukraine, because there they will meet less resistance.

Democracy is unreliable:

To stand, you must run.
  The existing electoral democracy is unreliable, unstable, governed by developing political technologies, propaganda.
  It is necessary to look ahead, continuously, to more reliable forms of organization.

Name "Advisory structure":

In 1990, I called the "advisory structure" "deliberative," because the main, if not the only way to avoid manipulation and degeneration of Civilization, is the organization of a meeting, harmonization on vital issues of society, which is simultaneously:
  • Democratic, more direct,
  • Do not distort the views,
  • Identifying the most important and effective opinions.

Why "structure"?

Only an extremely structured organization is able to fulfill the above requirements.
  Differences of it:
  • Preservation of plurality of opinions, influence of minority opinions, even one person,
  • Allocation and relative "independence" of "memes",
  • Network hierarchy of memes:
  - hierarchy - by unifying properties,
  - cross-links between groups also by properties.

Hierarchy of "memes" instead of the hierarchy of people.
  Absence of "management". Adequacy to the environment is the Internet.

Example: I try to structure my texts, starting from 1990.

Immortal mode:

Many oppositionists and political scientists prophesy the Kremlin regime an early death, based on historical analogies.
  But the difference between the current political "singularity" is that the current regime can for the first time prove immortal, showing miracles of adaptability.

In 100 years, the powers that be will also be immortal "vampires".
  Years after 100 the regime can even appear freedom, backlash.
  And then the regime will no longer adapt to the circumstances, but create them for people.
  And these circumstances, judging by everything, will be far from divine.

Managed "revolution", management of circumstances:

The Kremlin regime is able to simulate even its own "death", "revolution."
  In 1991, the "revolution" was already half-controlled by the KGB. -
  - People in power remained in the majority - the former, having changed only political orientation.
  - The KGB managed to lead the "revolution", the implementation of the requirements of "upstarts" to discredit the ideas most dangerous for the political elite, managed to direct the crowd's energy against itself.

In the 2020s, the "revolution" will already be administered by the FSB - 100%.
  The era of political crises catastrophic for the elites - was over.

Attempt # 2:

In 1990, I warned that "Perestroika" could end with "90", 3 times distributed "Self-organization of the Consultative Structure" to all activists known to me, but did not find understanding.
   Until 2017, the situation was not "revolutionary."
   Now I will make a new attempt.
   Fortunately, the Internet has appeared. "God created man to create the Internet."