Divine works


eng deu рус

the Appeal:

Russians need to understand:

from the 1st party:

- in Europe live better. - Salaries in Russia are not even enough for normal food, not to mention medicine, housing and education for children.
- Policemen in Russia are often more dangerous than bandits. – If you are not lucky, no one will not help - neither the court nor the Prosecutor. – "From the scrip and prison do not promise".
The poor will always lose to a thug in the power to bribe. - About 50% of prisoners in Russia are fake to some extent.
Therefore, money in Russia is not primarily a luxury, but social insurance.
Examples:
https://tvrain.ru/news/iznasilovanie_v_otdele_politsii-461548
https://www.svoboda.org/a/29102327.html

on the 2nd side:

- Living became better than in the USSR in the 1970s, and in the 1990s
- You can, at least, buy anything, if there is money.
- Fear became less. – If to do everything as the authorities recommend, and not to Express dissatisfaction with anything, the chances of a quiet life increase. - Arbitrariness can threaten from simple police officers, but not from the authorities.

"Change only makes life worse":
-After 1917 civil war, famine and terror began,
-After 1991 – unemployment and the dominance of crime.
No matter how cursed Putin, but he at least provides stability, ensures that it will not be worse.

"Believe in politics, no one"
- "My shirt is closer to my body." - Everyone thinks only about themselves, and, coming to power, will, above all, enrich themselves.
And Putin, at least, predictable.

it is necessary to Compare not with Europe, but with how they lived some 100 years ago:
Periodic famines due to drought and parasites. Diseases. Continuous big wars in which millions of people died. Complete disenfranchisement. -
- "Good deed goes unpunished".
Nothing to eat? But, we don't eat. Thanks for that.

life Expectancy is 15 years less than in Japan? -
- But on 30 years more, than 100 years ago.
Under Putin, at least, to live better, than under any former ruler.

it's not about bad life, it's about the global threat to life:

All would be nothing. – It is possible to live and not to grieve. -
The problem is not that one can live even better, but that grandchildren may not live at all.
"The same technological development that has made life better is a threat to it.

Democracy is not necessary to live better. -
It is the only chance of human survival.

 

Authoritarianism, oligarchy, tyranny is interested in me only indirectly.
- The main threat I consider development of technologies of psychological manipulation.

Mechanism of threat:

These technologies enhance the sustainability of a hierarchical closed centrally managed society.
Political heterogeneity and closeness, in turn, will create instability in the existence of society itself – in terms of technology, in particular Artificial intelligence. -

Collective intelligence vs. Artificial intelligence:

either the Collective intelligence of self-organization or the Artificial intelligence used by the ruling factions as a weapon against humans. - The third is not given.

the tools of Civil society should surpass those of the state.
The main factor is Advisory. -
Government instruments are good at implementing decisions, but they are not very effective at generating them.
The role of making optimal decisions is growing with the complication of technology and society.
However, with all the shortcomings of state instruments-there are no civilians at all.
Forums and collective blogs cannot be by definition.

the Mind is self-consciousness.
Collective intelligence should be an it-mechanism of collective correction of expediency in real time.

Civilization Existence-priority:

the Elimination of corruption, fair elections, economic democracy, Self-management, ESOP (the share Plan employee ownership), and t p is, of course, good.
But now all this is not relevant. -
- Good to live well, but to live at all-better.

the Decisive threat to Russia:

Although the regime in Russia looks less extremist than in many countries of the 2nd world, but it is the most dangerous for the survival of mankind, even compared to China, because the main pillar of the regime in Russia are propaganda technologies-unlike China, and the greatest threat is the improvement of propaganda technologies.
It is Russia's anomalous deviation from the normal path of development that poses the greatest threat.

Admissibility of local non-lethal violence:

Violence is an absolute evil.
Violence is not permissible for:
- to eliminate the extremist regime in Russia,
- to improve welfare and etc.

I do not call for violence, but if the survival of humanity is at stake, the solution may be different, given that now:
1. The advanced development of propaganda technologies increases the sustainability of Managed "democracy" and, accordingly, the non-sustainability of human existence.
That is, there is a threat of 2-fold "End of history" -
1st end-Termination of Civilization, and, as a result -
2nd end – the Destruction of Civilization.
2. In advance of the creation of parallel democratic structures, the continuity of extremism, the authorities may be impaired.
3. Non-lethal means more effective killing.
4. Neutralizing Russia's threats is also necessary to reduce the risk of global conflict or the like, as:
a. Russia has the largest nuclear Arsenal,
b. Management of Russia's Arsenal is unreliable.

Unnecessary violence outside the threat Centre:

Paradoxically, the use of violence against more terrorist regimes is not necessarily:
1. They play a small role in the survival of humanity.
2. After the elimination of the "threat Center" restructuring of other countries of the 2nd world will be easier.
3. Assistance in the necessary self-defense to protect people's lives can be applied pointwise.

volunteers Needed:

Therefore, in today's global world, the responsible people of good will must set aside local issues, and become a remote volunteers in Russia.
The Kremlin itself has given good. using "volunteers" in Donbass.

even some Ukrainians would be Enough:

1% of the us military budget can employ 2 million Ukrainian volunteer operators.

Factors:

1. The main work of the volunteers – p2p counter-propaganda. - Direct violence:
a. Will total only ?10% of labor costs
b. Is-non-lethal,
c. Will be short-time,
d. It will be-only help to the local population.
2. The tested means themselves may remain the property of the United States, especially since 90% of their value does not fall on consumable components.
3. The US itself, like Russia, will "not participate" in domestic Russian Affairs, thus not increasing the risk of a global conflict.

( the Average salary in Ukraine ?$3800/year,
Unemployment in Ukraine ?2 million people).

 

Reply-to E-mail:

Who is interested in the survival of Civilization, please write to E-mail - for lack of suitable SOFTWARE (Software).
I would appreciate advice from the appropriate SOFTWARE.
If you think it's schizophrenia, do not write, - the answer will be only on a constructive writing.
Here I will not answer for the same reason.