The Civil charity. Project:
the Problem:
it would Seem that this is a tautology. – What else could be charity, but not public? -
- It can still be state-owned.
Moreover,in undemocratic countries – only state.
All official charitable "NGOs" can be attributed to the state charity in such countries, since they are strongly controlled by the state.
of course, spontaneous charity is always and everywhere.
But in undemocratic countries it is invisible, hidden better than crime.
That is, it would not exist, as sex in the USSR.
Problems:
1. The futility of official charity:
example: "NGO" on assistance to migrants:
I am familiar with some "benefactors" helping migrant workers.
The head of this " NGO " on blat received an academic degree, a license, etc.
The authorities instructed him to create the appearance of charity - in front of the OSCE.
Moreover, the authorities do not even spend money on it. -
It did not receive funding from European institutions themselves.
Of course, the license is not quite false - he figured out the mechanisms of these very European institutions.
He hired absolutely soulless, but loyal performers. - Sympathetic performers would create unnecessary problems.
He created a hierarchical structure much more rigid than in the German army.
Secrecy and secrecy are the main factor. – No one but "kryshevateley" and sponsors don't have to guess about the existence of the NPO.
He performs a flurry of activity on the "window dressing", "postscripts" and "fraud".
In the absence of a real help migrants.
- Accidental migrant from the "sends" all right, if not mate.
Booklets for migrants utilized – all and secretly.
the Authorities cover up all the falseness. - Loyalty is the only thing that matters to them.
Generally, whatever the social problem that is the cause of it is lack of democracy, civilian control and the lack of public activities in General.
The only public activity in the described countries is pre-election campaigning for the "enemies of the people".
Ironically, it is conducted primarily by staff of non – governmental organizations-"voluntarily - forcibly" - under threat of dismissal.
the ROC, for example, is satanic because it is a state structure.
And the lack of democracy is the main reason the teacher irresponsibility, callousness and cynicism. - Look, for example, at the photos of "Soviet" people passing by dying of hunger.
By the way, there is an alternative Orthodox Church in Russia. It's the UOC.
if the Kremlin were to limit itself to the killing of a million other people, it threatens the existence of humanity.
Moreover, the political threat is larger than all other existential threats combined.
Inefficiency of spontaneous charity:
|