Divine works


eng deu рус

Putin is the leader of corruption:

"there is no alternative to Putin":

Opposition seeking the departure of Putin.
But the paradox is that Putin's successor may be even worse:

"Social state":

Putin's Team really conducts "social policy", - benefits to the needy, housing allowances, low prices and tariffs for necessities are stimulated,
However, this state-social assistance does not exceed the level of charity of the 19th century, and is much less expensive, for example, in Sweden.
The monthly allowance of a single mother, for example, is sufficient only for the purchase of cheap passports.

Putin's" Social policy " team pays off with propaganda. - The costs and risks in the case of repressive policies would be much greater.
This, incidentally, explains the effectiveness of Kremlin propaganda and Putin's ratings.

Historical factor:

Putin's"Social policy" is not so much a conscious choice as the team's historical inertia – the legacy of Soviet "Social policy."

education:

Putin-the fruit of" stagnant " education. He had good moral qualities: reliability, honesty, responsibility.
Because of these qualities, it was chosen as "the family" of Yeltsin.
However, all these positive qualities were one-sided-in relation to the higher authorities, combined with performance and careerism.

Soviet propaganda lied that everything was done for a person.
Putin was brought up by this duplicity, double-mindedness.
Giving instructions to Ministers now, Putin is not only playing "play". -
Perhaps he is really convinced that he is working for the benefit of the people - "in the circumstances".

for Putin priority, – the personal power. -

He deliberately built an authoritarian corruption System, and created "circumstances".

Yes, Putin is fighting grassroots corruption. - Yes, she him prevents.
But at the same time, he will never resort to the most effective measure – democratization, capable of eliminating corruption by 100%.
Putin is almost right. – He brought up a nation in which Russia, for example, is really just utopian Scandinavian model - "Democratic cooperation", "Social citizenship", Economic democracy, "Productive social policy", "investment in employment."

Corruption is not so much a bribe as an abuse of power.
Putin does not need to take bribes, he can profit quite legally - just creating "under himself and friends" "legal" loopholes."

the younger Putin's entourage, immigrants of the 1990s, is more cynical.
But they are not sure of themselves, they are not sure that they will be able to maintain the same strong propaganda.
Putin is a godsend not only for Yeltsin.
Putin is being detained for as long as possible, despite his mistakes, which cost billions to his entourage. - the risk of losing power can be even more expensive.

"Russian corruption":

the Bad news is that the government's reliance on propaganda is developing the latter.
Whatever the successors to Putin, they can already rely on watered-technology.
Russian corruption is dangerous precisely because of its connection with perfect polit - and IT-technologies.
Russian corruption is a threat because of its stability, which greatly reduces the stability of Human development.

"Singularity":

now, propaganda is still underdeveloped, not psychological. -
- Putin's team has to make social concessions, maneuver.
But technologies are developing rapidly, and in the middle of the 21st century there may be a political "singularity"-the development of IT - polit-technologies will strengthen themselves. The process will become irreversible.

Putin's System :

Putin's Group and the class of bureaucracy depend on each other.
Everyone creates their own part of the" System " - for themselves.
And with people all costs decides propaganda.

Injustice, Esprit de corps:

in a non-democratic country, any action becomes a problem -
The bureaucracy for all the popular cases received closed intra-departmental Orders, abolishing the Laws and the Constitution.
Courts until recently, trying to give replies, to cling to the commas.
If the internal regulation does come out, only the Court, the Prosecutor's office, but not an individual, can appeal it to the constitutional court.
Laws are ambiguous, they are always interpreted in favor of officials.