Divine works


eng deu рус

Help me:

I have over 50 social and technical ideas that I would like to use to enhance the sustainability of human development.
I think these ideas are very important.
For example, the ideas of Autonomous transport, housing and the Internet will reduce the uncontrollability of power.

First of all, I am looking for unanimous people who can share this desire.
Ideas for me are only a means to increase sustainability.
I mean, to me the effectiveness of ideas is more important than personal, etc. factors.

the 1st idea - by time and importance-is the way of communication:
I want to create a "Deliberative structure" that would ensure the most constructive and effective joint development of Projects.

I think the most effective structure would be the following:
Each person leads their own Projects.
He's his own boss and he doesn't obey anyone.
But he:
1. Uses universal software (Software),
for the Projects 2. According to the same standards.
Of course, of themselves and of the standards of m b is not alone. - Between them it comes simple competition.

this SOFTWARE helps a person to build his Project in a convenient hierarchical form.
In this form, his Project is visible to all.
Anyone can write criticism in his Project and so on.
But the" owner " of the Project is also its moderator.
"The owner" may "plagiarism"-paste as part of your Project - other people's work, but with links.

Other people also lead their own Projects, many repetitive and for the most part unoriginal.

"Smart" SOFTWARE will allow you to make "Union" Projects of different people.
That is to give the most "advanced" state at the moment.

 

"merge" Projects-according to different settings.

 

I Propose to upgrade some software "engine"

To begin with – to implement a "moderation bottom":
1. The lack of overall moderation
2. Opportunities to limit participants-personal "branches" ("circles", "themes").
3. The independence of the problematic hierarchy.

I intend to start with the self-organization of the "Deliberative structure" because I consider personal factors to be the most significant.

 

file: Why Jews Advisory structure:

 

In 1-x, because ordinary people do not need war.
Simple Arabs provoked a variety of interested intermediaries.

in 2, Advisory structure-there is a way of the solution of any questions not – militarily.

in 3, Deliberative structure-there is a means of mutual understanding between ethnic groups.
That is, a means of reducing anti-Semitism and misunderstandings.

in 4, Deliberative structure - there is a mechanism of equal leadership. That is, leadership without its monetization and politicization.
That is, Jews will be able to offer and promote Projects without intrigue, corruption and the use of administrative and financial resources, and – openly, legitimately and freely.