Divine works


eng deu рус

About Free Will:

On Laws - first:

In my youth, I was surprised. - As judges pass correct, fair verdicts, because the laws are so ambiguous, especially in the USSR, incomplete, limited. -
  - The final formulations in natural language in general it is impossible to cover the infinite complexity of life.
  Then I realized that the function of laws is not justice, but a scam:
  - The judge should inspire people with the appearance of "justice". - Especially in the USSR, Russia.

Now I add that the investigation never gives a 100% guarantee - at least because of the hallucinations of law enforcement officers, examinations, etc. - at least because of Demon Descartes.
  See the study on the errors of recognition of persons - Dean Buonomano, the reliability of genomic examinations, etc.

About Free Will:

Where did this question come from?
  - Lawyers with the help of him proved the innocence of influential criminals.
  Suppose the behavior of the criminal is 100% -determined.
  Then this does not in the least remove the "guilt" from him, since the "fault" itself is a "subjective" arbitrariness that is not closely connected with the deterministic behavior of the criminal, and with the "Laws", even if the behavior of the accusers is also determined.
  This is just an illustration of what:

Freedom of will and Determinism can perfectly coexist with each other, since Freedom of will is subjective, and does not intersect with Determinism.

& nbsp;

file: The main error of the penitentiary system. Settlements:

Self-awareness must be immortal:

It's wrong that people die.
  Man suffers not so much from death - it is short-lived, but from the consciousness of the death of his loved ones.

The main error of the penitentiary system:

Punish not the person, but his family. - His children, parents.
  - A criminal, usually whiter than a "thick-skinned", so he is a criminal.
  That is, the criminal himself no longer suffers, but innocent people.

Judicial punishment is a formalism left over from savage times, when punishment was revenge or intimidation by the ruler.

Are the sufferings of a close criminal the fault of himself?:

1. No judge, no one is 100% responsible for himself.
  Human in man - a thin layering over wild instincts.
  2. If the state and the court transfer 100% of the responsibility to the perpetrator, then they are also unnecessary 100%. - We need institutions responsible.

Is the state trying to improve society, to correct criminals?

- This is demagogy.
  1. Prison is a school that educates criminals.
  2. An authoritarian state makes society worse, and generates criminals.

What should I do?

- First of all, - to enable people to be shielded from criminals, and for this - from authoritarian states.
  That is, to give people independence.
  Give the opportunity to live in the communities that they choose themselves.

Will there arise small, totalitarian sects with arbitrariness?

- This is another question.
  - "Sects" should be open, and basic international declarations must be respected, - on human rights, etc.
  By the way, in authoritarian states, as a rule, they are not observed.

& nbsp;