Divine works


eng deu рус

The threat of AI. My comment:

Anthropomorphism is everywhere:
  Desires - AI does not have any desires or emotions, and it will not even be in the future - on the material - "iron" level. And they will not be needed by anyone.
  The erroneous opinion about the self-sufficiency of the intellect arises from the illusion - that the human mind itself is the reason that it is at least a little independent. -
  - A person's mind is 100% determined by desires and emotions.
  Illusion comes from a lack of self-awareness.
  Most often do not notice their own self-esteem, which is the main engine (bickering) especially in geeks.

However, AI can be dangerous, but - based on the tasks assigned to it.
  For example, to deliver passengers, - to move other people.
  But even if AI is ahead of the human intellect, the person will be able to provide very reliable security measures.
  How? - In addition to those listed in the article itself and in the comments to it, it can be still:
  1. Openness.
  Here again Anthropomorphism. - It's a man, because of his desires, he used to hide everything, even from himself, and deceive everyone, even himself.
  2. A stronger AI monitors the background of the 2nd AI.
  At the same time, it is independent of the 2 nd, and is limited only by control.
  - Expert AI, cut off from physical bodies in principle will not be able to kill a person.
  In the worst case, he will confuse the person with his head. But this danger is vanishingly small in comparison with purposeful propaganda.
  3. A stronger AI develops security measures.

Nevertheless, Civilization really, most likely, will perish, in 500 years, and die - because of AI.
  But for a different reason - human, social, class.
  A threat to a person is not AI, but the person who uses AI.
  In a nearby commentary (https://geektimes.ru/company/asus/blog/291753/ The Dark Future of the Internet) it was said that only an individual is intelligent, but not a society.
  The monkey society possessed nuclear weapons. But they have enough sense of self-preservation, and it will not destroy them. Then they take possession of synthetic biology. But she will not destroy them either. But they will not be able to divide AI.

Generally, the carelessness of people (geeks) is surprising, which only cares about their self-esteem, vypendrez is more important than their own descendants.
  In the same commentary ( https://geektimes.ru/company/asus/blog/291753 The Gloomy Future of the Internet) it was said that nothing depends on us "the reality is severe, and with our expectations does not converge." Although many things depend on geeks: -
  Konachan700 forgets about the "Butterfly Effect". - The novelty of the Internet stage is that we can create a "Divine" software tool that will interest housewives, and they can change financial flows bypassing both intermediaries.
  - My comment in - https://geektimes.ru/post/291545

& nbsp;