Divine works


eng deu рус

the Consensus of action. Survival Alliance:

for me, consensus is not a convergence of worldviews, and not even the science of finding the maximum area of intersection of existing positions, but – above all – the process of finding people who agree to the maximum – broad joint actions.

Example: Anarchists and Communists:

I do not share the basic tenets of ideologies of anarchism or communism. -

on Anarchism:

I think the best-the existence of the state now,
I do not consider the fight against the state to be the Central point.

on communism:

I am an opponent of generalization of means of production,
I am opposed to all redistribution – as the basis of policy, I oppose restrictions, unlimited power, much less violence.

nevertheless, I am looking for broad cooperation with both Communists and, especially, anarchists – based on a broad convergence of action strategies.
For their purposes, and the anarchists and the Communists take strategies.
Paradoxically, but in different points they can coincide even with the strategies of their opponents.
And anarchists and Communists always went to temporary, tactical political alliances, United fronts - with anyone – for example, to overthrow the dictatorship, to prevent the coming to power of more dangerous opponents.

Now I am looking for a Union, a United front, but not tactical, but – strategic – 100-year-old, and not against some party, but to prevent the development of Civilization in a deadlock Managed democracy, especially with the use of Artificial intelligence, especially at the risk – at the same time - the destruction of Civilization.

what can be common policies?:

with some anarchists:

the Ousting of state-controlled apparatus, a supporting role.
Orientation on the elimination of the state-utopian and harmful. -
Analogue: Russia, 1917: the State apparatus is paralyzed.
However, it ended with a rollback to one of the strongest dictatorships in history.

for most anarchists, the elimination of the state is not an end in itself, but a means of democratization.
Deliberative structure is able to avoid "Managed democracy", and, by the way, really replace the state. But-gradually," germination", and the organized political competition.

with some Communists:

what is the purpose of Communists? – social equality.
The socialization of the means of production is only a means.
The goal of consensus is to find Communists who agree to the real achievement of their goal.

Liberal socialism:

- Socialism = reduction of social inequality - not through taxes, prohibitions and coercion, but in the opposite way.
Perfect, and not one-sided liberalism, a perfect market are themselves able to reduce the rate of profit and unemployment almost zero, and to make centralised proizvodstva – uncompetitive.
However, Perfect liberalism and market = Networked economy became possible only at the end of the 20th century-with the advent of IT.

with some liberals:

- the same Perfect liberalism.

with some Democrats:

Deliberative structure is probably the only possibility for the preservation of democracy and the development of a Perfect democracy.

with some ecologists:

Deliberative structure may be the only option to save the planet Earth from physical destruction after 500 years.

with some feminists:

the Aim of most feminists is not to compete with men in cruelty, cynicism and selfishness, but to move from an inhuman, irresponsible and soulless Patriarchy to a humane Civilization.
However, for the survival of Civilization in General, it is now necessary to increase the political role of less aggressive and ambitious women.

With some of the faithful:

there is in fact no difference between the Kingdom of heaven and the society of the Immortals, which can only be an alternative to "Governed democracy" and, perhaps, the end of our world, since Earthly civilization may have the greatest chances of survival, and other Universes are empty.

with some technocrats:

the development of Civilization is possible only with the help of IT.
However, the chances of survival or death of it = 50/50.
The responsible conduct of engineers is depends now, as never before.