Divine works


eng deu рус

Deliberative structure, my comments:

I didn't see discussion of the main thing — options of effective one-rank structures.
example (maybe not quite successful): Wikipedia /
The Internet allows to create systems of interpersonal interactions of any complexity.
Hypothesis: Possible powerless structures, a hierarchical superior in efficiency and even, paradoxically — less randomness — is due much less to the limited options.
Hierarchical structures do not exist because they are more effective, but because of socio-historical selection based on violence.
Would give a link to the specifics, Yes, I'm afraid — in Russia banned.
- My Comment in https://geektimes.ru/post/291405

the question of power is the question of survival:

the question of power is not a question of the effectiveness of cooperation, but of survival-in today's conditions:
If we carry out a factor analysis, I am sure, the main cause of both Chernobyl and Fukushima will be power - both disasters could be envisaged under a different structure.
It is not clear why the early warning system did not work and did not order a nuclear response, listening only to yourself: "Well, what to do, comrades, it is necessary to answer". God again?
By the way, about the "incompetence" mentioned here: the 1st lack of hierarchy was noted by K. marks: Distortion and narrowing of information going both up and down.

to catch up to the "White list":

it is Important to have time to implement the Advisory structure – before the implementation of the "White lists" in Russia - to ban all sites except those permitted.
Plus, the Advisory structure is that the number of independent media will be equal to the number of the population, and the authorities will have to censor every resident.

Idea:" butterfly Effect","Trigger":

"A supporter of anarchy online is not able to pay for freedom comparable to Housewives" ,-

" - to interest the authorities for the necessary laws, providers for priority / caching, authors for content.
Enough idealism-the reality is harsh, and our expectations do not converge."
( https://geektimes.ru/company/asus/blog/291753 Bleak future of the Internet 4 08 2017)

No, the novelty of the online stage that we can create a "Divine" tool that will be of interest to Housewives, and they will change financial flows to bypass both middlemen.

Purpose – the performance of:

the 1st factor of the" individual censorship "of the Advisory structure is not an insult, but effective cooperation with people who understand"at a glance".

Anarchists don't start with:

Anarchists imitate the state, although their means must be completely original, asymmetric.
They need to work out these effective ways, instruments of cooperation and collective work first.

Expert community:

impact Factors of the Deliberative structure:

1. The ability to produce the best solutions to suit many.
2. Orderliness.

more Precisely, the influential will not be the "Deliberative structure", but its individual sub-communities, whose views may be diametrically opposed.

analogy: Pioneer in science:

1 the person who finds an effective solution to change all of science.
But in science easier. - The scientific community is unanimous, in particular, in curiosity.
Political pioneers sometimes simply "disappear".

The point of the Deliberative structure is that it will be an effective tool for finding effective solutions.
The idea of the Advisory structure in combining "+ "- s competition with " + " - mi consensus:
Free competition will create a selection of ideas without violence.
The mechanism of finding like-minded people will develop potentially effective ideas that would otherwise be buried in the Bud.
The idea of a Deliberative structure is that the bearers of such ideas can separate themselves from murderous criticism.
Of course, freedom, individual self-determination, and "bottom-up power"will generate many dead-end branches,
99% of the community would be useless.
- But 100% of communities are useless in the world of propaganda.
Let participants dead-end branches exercise. This is useful.

"Meetings":

the Meaning of "meetings" is not in finding optimal solutions, but in subordination.
People are forced to listen to eloquent servants of the chief-for propaganda and persuasion. - A convinced performer is more effective.
It would seem that different opinions could be read both in absentia and at will.
But then, most likely, would have won opinion on the confiscation of property of the chief and his clan.
Therefore, the performers do not have the right to discuss "collegial" decisions.

the Problem was that the hierarchical decision-making mechanism of the servants was really effective. -
- The unorganized performers could not oppose anything reasonable, except trivial disobedience and revolt.
But, the Internet era makes hierarchical mechanisms not just immoral, but useless. -
- To confiscate the property of the chief and his clan is not necessary. - It will end without violence. -
- If-OPGG fail, do not have time to use the same Artificial intelligence - to preserve their power.