Divine works


eng deu рус

Dangerous not AI, and dementia people pseudo - "developed" countries, -

- distraction of their attention in a false direction:

1. Towards climate, etc. "threats":

in the 1's "climate threat", for example, does not exist as well,
in 2, the trouble of climate change compared to the threat from the use of AI can be compared to the damage of the hair cut off the head.

2. In the direction of the AI:

the Threat is not AI in itself, but the political use of AI.

3. Towards the West:

Although AI is more perfect in the USA, but there it is:
a. The goal of AI is to benefit people, even through profit,
b. Democratic control works somehow.

At the same time, in Russia, for example:
a. The aim of AI is to harm people by, for example:
- Increasing inequality,
- Fooling people, including Westerners,
- Terrorizing people, - and not only mental.
(Whether cause and effect are confused here is a moot point in the evolutionary psychology of elites.)
b. Uncontrolled use of "terminators"- politicians.

4. Towards commercial use AI:

"Given that the greatest investment in AI is made through marketing efforts, AI will make our lives richer but not happier".
Perhaps it will ruin the lives of the feeble-minded and weak-willed people, but it is not a "threat"compared to the political use of AI.

Perhaps the diversion of public attention to the wrong side is already politically calculated.
"Yellow media" perhaps purposefully distract narrow-minded people on far-fetched stories of fantasy films and & quot;problems" aliens.
For stupid people purposefully create an Association "greenhouse effect" with the climate of Venus.

But 99% of people throughout history were not interested in AI, but in ecology, feminism, socialism and other amusements? – Just now a special – the decisive moment history, when need to temporarily all switch on AI.

Google programmers will create Paradise, but their users will be taken to hell.

 

1623

 

Relativity of social perception:

Perception of even physical objects can be distorted:
Illusions, perceptual content, qualia, hallucinations, binocular rivalry, multistable perception.
Illusions, perceptual contents, qualia, hallucinations, binocular rivalry, multitable perception.

Social objects are not even objective.
Their perception is determined by social factors - culture, history, etc.

Gettier-worlds:

Gettier showed the fallacy of the traditional philosophy of understanding knowledge as a true and valid opinion.

people's Opinions may be valid and supported by observations, but they may be false.

Real "Matrix":

People will be in the real world.
But to live in an artificial world.

AI will not convince people of anything. -
AI will give observations in which people will build for themselves the right picture of the world, come to the right conclusions, and behave in accordance with this picture.

 

On 3 possible types of functioning of AI by nick Bostrom:

1. More likely – at first:
a. Put a broad task – both for "Sovereign": " Invent a faster, more economical and safer means of transportation of people", - but in the "Oracle" mode.
b. Do, will be technical challenges in a more explicit and require less initial information, and not political.
2. Over the recommendations "Oracle" superiors laugh, and give programmers the command to ask AI: "How to create a more efficient car engine?"
For example, when I proposed a faster, more economical and safer means of transportation for people - 30 years ago, it was only laughed at.