Seasteading – Criticism; Venice-2.0:
"Our whims at your expense":
it is Assumed that the city will be paid by its residents, despite the fact that they will not be customers.
Billionaires-initiators contradict themselves:
They say that the people themselves will decide - how to live, but at the same time solve all the main issues for people:
- order settlement.
- About city design,
- About location,
- About the used technology and the economy.
It was still possible to understand, if they themselves decided themselves be paid.
Better billionaires initiators the same money that they spent on their toys - they would have spent to pay for the fact that will solve the community.
1. A floating city is needed not for romance, but for the survival of humanity. -
- To create alternatives to authoritarian States, not only for social experiments, and to actively create micro-cultures by unanimous people with the help of neighborly residence.
2nd objective - "Final solution to the issue of political refugees".
- In a Floating city is optimal to settle not only developers and remote workers, but also on >50% - staff.
3. AI Intellectual property reform through Maritime piracy:
"HavenCo has no restrictions on copyright or intellectual property on data hosted on its servers, as Sealand is not a member of the WTO or WIPO".
/ "HavenCo claimed that it had no restrictions on copyright or intellectual property for data hosted on its servers, arguing that as Sealand was not a member of the WTO or WIPO",
the Design offered a completely non-optimal – based on a simplified extrapolation similar to the steam of the horses of the 19th century.
The optimal design of a city in the ocean is not like a city, but like a ship.
On the breakwater perimeter:
the Proposed expensive floating breakwater-the wall is not a breakwater - it is almost useless.
Optimal – underwater breakwater-power plant, which I proposed in the 1980s.
it is Necessary to correlate the cost and functions that ensure the achievement of the goal.
the sea of Azov, the Adriatic or the Baltic sea – the optimal
1. Few people, even enthusiasts will want to go to the other side of the Earth.
2. In small seas, the excitement is much less than in the ocean opposite California.
3. Closer to authoritarian States, alternatives are being created.
4. The turnover, the construction is cheaper.
Before creating "selenium Whip" – high-speed Internet - the main means of production - much cheaper.
once Again about the design:
For shallow seas, "the bike" can not invent – in the Netherlands, in Germany, etc. - for a long time there are thousands of houses on the water.
Over the decades, the optimal design has been developed. –
- No house land on a pontoon, and Ponton, whose house is like only a surface of it.
Not a large Module – 3 houses on a common pontoon 2500 m2,
and 1 house-pontoon ≈5*20 m.
it is Not necessary to spend the money immediately on the mega-city. –
- It is optimal to start – with a few only floating houses.
Large public Modules are more appropriate to add – later, when the Project "goes".
the Main problem is not design at all, but legal.
- If Billionaires-initiators really want to help the Movement, then it is optimal for them to direct their fame – to organize public pressure on governments, including with the goals:
- Adjustments to the international law of the sea;
- Final denunciation of the Treaty on the sea of Azov.
Arbat – spit of freedom.
once Again about the location:
do Not make a revolution. – Even on the Baltic sea there are already floating houses. –
Need only move such home 12 miles in international waters.
There are floating houses in Venice.
In territorial waters the location is not optimal: -
- If you already lose independence, it is cheaper to stay on one of the dozens of uninhabited Islands in Europe.
"Roof":
the Initiators sent out a proposal to the leaders of 15 tiny States.
However, it would be more appropriate to offer it to politicians of large, democratic countries. -
The leaders of tiny States may fear a threat to their power.
It's like "Yin" and "Yang" - the ruler must have an opponent. And the enemy will try to use a neighbor.
Democratic countries, on the contrary, provide legal protection when creating alternatives to authoritarian regimes - on "fragments of colonial empires".
the Export of clean water and electricity is PR and propaganda based on the romanticism and dementia of the intellectual elite.
Their import is more optimal.
Especially as the floating city is on border of territorial waters, that is near the coast.
the closed cycle of sewage treatment is Also not optimal. –
- More profitable than conventional treatment to meet local regulations.
food production is Not optimal. -
- More profitable – specialization – income, for example, from remote work, and food imports.
On the economy:
Unlike the FSB, we should not rely on the promotion of romance and patriotism, but on the economy.
A Floating city is really beneficial even economically - today, under certain conditions:
Rental housing in Moscow, Silicon valley or London - several times more expensive than a Houseboat in the shallow sea, even with the laying of 12 miles of high-speed cable.
- The Internet is the main means of production of developers.
Comfort is also an economic category, - proximity to:
- to the Urban infrastructure of old Venice,
- to relatives in Europe,
- to The beaches of the Adriatic,
- to the Alpine Ski resorts.
the Role of initiators is organizational. –
The benefits of a visa-free city are growing rapidly with the size of this city.
1. A lonely house in the open sea is several times more expensive than in cooperation with like-minded people,
2. Home "chip" Floating city – the neighborhood with unanimous people. –
Own "street" and school without bandits – for their children.
In 1988 I participated in a similar project.
cooperation Proposal:
This Project will not make a profit.
It is unlikely that the proponents refer to it as a commercial.
Therefore, they should not treat me as a competitor.
Therefore, it is advisable to try to cooperate with them.
5136
the Floating house, the Settlement, the Community Project:
Project: In the sea of Azov:
- At the border between Ukraine and the "occupied zone".
See the status of the water area to: sea of Azov
Abstract.docx
Peacekeeping functions:
Observation
- Meeting room,
- Counter - propaganda, – broadcasting to Donbass.
NATO warships on the invitation of Ukraine in the Azov nastily
sea.
Settlement is more efficient.
Sea - Places:
|
|
Not internal |
Max waves |
|
Bering |
|
|
|
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jTnKwIbeLSk/V-
CJyq7mkgI/AAAAAAAADXM/KpKT7Ba6DxE9vjzCqeKL5swVU-
PaPsx8QCLcB/s1600/US%2BEEZ%2B2.png |
Gulf of California |
Gulf of California |
|
|
|
Newfoundland |
Newfoundland |
|
|
|
Baltic |
|
|
|
www.helcom.fi:80/GIS/en_GB/HelcomGIS/ |
Carpentaria Bay |
Carpentaria Bay |
|
|
|
Red |
Red |
|
|
|
Gulf of Thailand |
|
|
|
|
Javanese |
|
|
|
|
Azov |
Azov |
|
|
Azov sea Abstract.docx
https://i0.wp.com/voelkerrechtsblog.org/wp-
content/uploads/2018/01/Unbenannt.pn |
Persian Gulf |
Persian Gulf |
|
|
|
Adriatic |
Adriatic |
|
|
|
marble |
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aegean_12_nm.svg
http://twitpic.com/c9oms8 |
Thracian |
Thracian |
|
|
|
vermey Bay |
Vermeisya Bay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yellow |
Yellow |
|
|
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rq2b069 |
Aki |
Aki |
|
|
|
Gang |
Banda |
|
|
|
Camotes |
Camotes |
|
|
|
phillipines |
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ph_Territorial_Map.png |
|
Bass Strait |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project: Baltic sea; Norwegian fjord:
International waters in the Baltic sea:
Baltic sea Abstract.docx
Work in Norway - without immigration, without buying expensive housing,
Housing – on a comfortable boat.
|