Acceleration and Development:
Acceleration and publicity are needed not by "socialism", but by capitalism. -
All Negroes – in developers:
There is only one solution to the problems caused by the development of technology. –
- This is the acceleration of technology development.
How to solve environmental problems? – accelerating the development of environmental technologies.
How to solve the problems of economic refugees from Africa? - accelerating technology development for Africa.
How to solve the problem of hunger in Africa? - accelerating technology development in Africa itself.
1 way – extensive-passive:
Entrepreneurs use a cheap slave force to build the plants. Africa, on its own.
Disadvantage. – The cost of development to catch up with the profit.
Even, to stand still - need to to flee today.
2 path – intensive-active, "singularity":
There are endless possibilities in all technological areas.
But they are not visible until there are discoveries and inventions made.
2 way. – Africans are not trying to feed themselves, but are engaged in advanced developments, go to the scientific gap.
Examples of destinations:
- Energy reduction,
- Reduction in the cost of transport, including space,
- Cheapening of the industry based on microprocessors and communication,
- Improving the efficiency of distance education.
But it is more effective to start moving – not in Africa, but in Asia and China.
Intellectual openness:
This is the promotion of conservative liberalism. -
- This is the elimination of intellectual monopoly.
This is the elimination of the monopoly on Intellectual property.
This exemption rento recipient from intellectual monopoly.
Rent recipients should retain all their rights except one – the right to monopolize.
Developers should be reimbursed for development costs. -
- Developers, but not intermediaries, monopolizing the rights of developers.
But not monopolists-intermediaries, applying "umbrella patenting" entire areas of technology.
Analogy: American farmers (=Asian developers) – directly processing areas of the earth, and English intermediaries-latifundist (=American corporations).
A liberal, non-protectionist market for small plots of land (= parallel patents) is needed.
the costs to the developers, is more efficient than using monopolization and transparency of use of development. -
- In conditions of openness and cheap IT – facts of using developments can not be hidden.
Accordingly, "marginality" development will be higher, higher will be the income of developers.
And this - even without
increased use of developments, and
accelerate the development itself.
2222
"Hybrid"development and technological orientation of E-economy:
Technological orientation of the E-economy:
Paradox, – focus on profit reduces profit.
It is necessary to treat technology as the only profit factor.
In the USSR there was an orientation to physical indicators – the production plan was set in tones, pieces. In rubles, however, too.
But the cost indicators were secondary because of:
1. Absence of market pricing,
2. Militaristic orientation of the economy.
However, physical orientation was not technological. – "the Introduction of" technologies, though prescribed, but almost not supported by incentives – compared to "gross" indicators.
In the "market" economy, economic incentives prevail.
But its organizational forms and straightforwardness of incentives greatly distort the existing factors and poorly contribute to the achievement of economic results.
As in the USSR, "physics" is detached from the economy. –
Economic planning of fundamental science development is completely absent.
This is justified by the fact that scientific discoveries can not be planned.
However, this is not the case:
1. Discoveries in "Technological", that is economically significant physics - have almost all been made.
2. Scientific discoveries can be planned probabilistically:
a. On the basis of the philosophical position "allowed everything that is not prohibited".
b. In the sense of "fuzzy logic", - planning is not 12.2%, 10-15%
3. The complexity of planning does not reduce its reliability, but rather increases it. -
When focusing on economic results, and with an appropriate technological approach to science that does not take into account its internal thematic fragmentation, these same economic results can be predicted, modeled with high accuracy.
Almost the only factor optimizing scientific research, in terms of maximizing economic returns, is the organizational form of these studies. –
It should be non-exclusive:
1. Without a monopoly of funding,
2. Without exclusive, hierarchical management, 1-rank,
3. Without monopoly on scientific "intellectual" property,
4. With powerful AI-grouping tools to help find like-minded people and effectively cooperate with them.
2 development models:
1. Authoritarian:
AI serves as the governing elite.
People-developers are replaced by AI.
2. Hybrid:
AI is used by developers.
Actually today works just a Hybrid model
The problem is that with the preservation of the authoritarian political organization of society, AI will be able to replace a person, including - in the creative development
Rulers will not need people, more than that, will be a hindrance.
While maintaining the privileges of power and competition for power, rulers will allow high risks associated with the use of AI to preserve "sustainability" – sustainability in their interests, which will mean a decline in the sustainability of humanity as a whole.
"Hybrid" = Non-exclusive:
the Point is that "hybrid" development organization coincides with non-exclusive.
It will provide much greater economic growth.
But this requires an organization of understanding of this. -
How to whitewash authoritarianism – the main threat to the existence of mankind - today? – Just. -
It is only necessary to show an alternative Program:
a Life - new technologies that make life even whiter comfortable,
b. Personal real income - in dollars.
People should see models calculated in dollars.
And it is for modeling, calculation of the Program it is necessary to use AI.
3033
|