Divine works


eng deu рус

"A-forcing" – Project:

Suggest:

for "A-forcing"="Non-forcing"

the Proposed course is completely within the framework of the classical "Anarchism".

Differences:
1. Objectives:
1 – the Survival of Civilization.
2 – Fair, safe, etc. etc. society. That is exactly 2.

2. Symbiosis, cooperation, not just coexistence with the state.
a. Within democratic States.
b. International cooperation of anarchic micro-States.

 

Reality:
Perhaps "Anarchy" is possible, that is, can exist in principle.
However, its feasibility is more important.

Demonopolization, above all – intellectual.

Separation of power from property.

 

Parallelism:

- instead of passive civil disobedience.
"+" is more Efficient - as more supporters as more profitable in the Information age.
"Gray-white" economy:
- "Shadow" non-criminal economy.
Non-criminal – under the laws of democratic countries.
For example, paying "taxes" in the form of charity, in t h political charity aimed at regime change.

Anarchism and Nonviolence:

Contradiction:

On the 1st side: Anarchism is "the absence of forced control and power of man over man" (ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Анархизм)
"Anarchy - no centralized violent power"
With 2nd side: "Anarchism and violence closely connected in popular thought, in part due to the concept of "Propaganda by deed"" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_and_violence)

Causes of contradiction:

1. State terrorism in Europe in the 19th century. – Anarchists responded with terror to terror.
2. "disease". Young romantics seemed to be: kill the tyrant and all will be happy.

Declaration required:

the Anarchists should declare the goal of Anarchism is the non – violence,
And, especially in the 21st century, publicly abandon violent means of achieving nonviolence.

Necessary public self-defence:

the State propaganda claims that the violence of the state already the minimum required.
But that's cheating.
On the 2nd hand, State propaganda convicts anarchists of utopianism. – simple elimination of centralized violence will create rampant de-centralized violence
State propaganda linked in popular thought "Anarchism" with the dominance of bandits and racketeers.

 

the Principle of less violence -
Better
- Instead "substitute the left cheek".

 

to study whether violence propaganda or counter-propaganda.

 

Anarchism and human survival:

the Emphasis in the counter-propaganda should not be on freedom. – it is not necessary for the layman, but on the fear of the death of all that they love - before the death of their descendants.
And there is not a drop of propaganda, manipulation, distortion, exaggeration.-
- Power is the main threat to the existence of Civilization today.
- People have reached such power that the struggle for power and its preservation will inevitably destroy the Earth.
The environment, AI and t n is only a secondary fee or means.

Infantilism of anarchists:

It seems that the Western anarchists are in the majority really infantile. – Engaged in a game of domestic politics, not noticing the real threat to the existence of earth Civilization.

Anti-monopolism instead of anti-Globalism:

the Harm comes not from globalization, but from global monopolization under the guise of "globalization",
- to harm the people with the hands of the most fooled people.
In an era of "Managed democracy", it is not so much protests as revelations that are important.

Monopoly and social liberalism:

we Need to calculate the relationship between the monopolization factor and social inequality.
I am sure that monopolization is responsible for 90% of social inequality in authoritarian countries.
It is necessary to calculate it – for clarity. - People this ties not see and not understand,
In the CIS countries after 2013, there is the classic "absolute poverty".
Factors for this:
The ruling groups have mastered the technology of manipulation
- Finance, and
- psychology.
The ruling groups profit, first of all, by creating obstacles to free production and trade.

Separation of property from power:

2 mental factors pose a threat:
- power, and
- money.
Separating their actions will greatly reduce the threat.
Authoritarian States are dangerous precisely because their rulers are at the same time connected with considerable property.
But even in democratic countries, money has a great influence on elections and other political processes.
This effect is very important to reduce.
Method 1 – information, -
1. On the relations of rulers with assets,
2. About the benefits for people break this ties.

 

I do not change my beliefs:

- As it became in 1988, an anarchist, and remain, in contrast to the Communists=anti-Communists, "national-Democrats"=anti-Democrats.

 

3937

 

the

"Anarchy" and the Newspeak Project:

Idea:

Try 2 more terms:
• "A-via" – "nonviolence", and
• "A-forcing" – "non-forcing".

"–" Multiplication of "entities.
The term will not be replaced - the meaning of any will be independent, as happened with "Libertarianism".
But words are only means. The main thing – the result.

option: "A-vía":

In authoritarian countries, the most effective – instead of losing and incomprehensible words "anarchism" and "libertarianism" use the term denoting nonviolence.
For me, power is violence. "Coercion" is not even a property of it, but a synonym.

"+" is Short, sonorous.
"–" Already uses a close term "Non-violence" - with a radical sense of absolute nonviolence.

option: "A - forcing":

"+" is More adequate and close in meaning to "Anarchy".

"Non-violence" instead "Freedom":

Propaganda ("Newspeak" in the style of Orwell "1984") has successfully linked the word "freedom"with lawlessness, arbitrariness and theft.

"Anarchism" and "Libertarianism":

the Word "Libertarianism" was invented by cowardly anarchists, who thus recognized their defeat in the fight against state propaganda.
The state propaganda has managed to present anarchists as terrorists - in the eyes of ordinary people - irresponsible people who do not want to work, want only to use drugs, to have free sex, and even to Rob, without incurring any responsibility for it.
Naturally, the term "libertarianism" immediately filled with excellent, even more incomprehensible meaning.
On the 1st hand, the state censorship does not give to explain this concept to people.
On the 2nd hand, state propaganda says - "You see – the anarchists themselves are entangled in their primitive, infantile utopian fantasies."

Managing circumstances in a "Managed democracy" is more than propaganda:

In the 1990s, Russian rulers created circumstances in Russia in which the people independently, without verbal propaganda, came to the conclusion of the need for "strong power".
Russian "Newspeak" surpassed not only English, but also the Orwell.

 

1707