Divine works


eng deu рус

Hidden threat:

Some knowledgeable people may think that things are not so bad. –
We don't eat ourselves is, what is, to the "werewolves" you can adjust
But when the civil war in the heart of Tajikistan-1992 it is possible to die.

the Danger of authoritarianism is different. – The threat of destruction of Civilization and humanity.
Internal-political instability is becoming more dangerous today than external-political – international.

Major wars between States become unprofitable in the 21st century.
But the benefits of growing inequality are growing - within States.
It is with the growth of the benefits of the struggle for power, and the growth of technological capabilities of the struggle for power - and growing instability of the existence of Civilization.

the misconception about the instability of authoritarian regimes is Very dangerous. -
Supposedly, they are doomed sooner or later to a democratic transition.
Indeed, it has been so far. -
- To the groups fighting for the power liberalization was favorable.
- It accelerated economic growth, in which, despite some enrichment of the "bottom", "top" enriched even more.

artificial intelligence Technology changes this pattern:
1. Economic growth is provided by a narrow layer of privileged programmers.
2. Increased ability to calculate more "optimal" and controlled trajectories.
3. Artificial intelligence is able to increase the effectiveness of propaganda so as to eliminate the discontent of the "people" even with its "absolute impoverishment."

Russia, in Alliance with the Central Asian dictatorships, is capable of reaching the continuity of "Facade democracy".

the Crowd can become just a hindrance and a resource-a hotbed of competing groups.
However, plans to eliminate the people are unreliable, and may end with the elimination of all mankind.

Chance 1, - to be in time with democratization and openness.

the Crowd is stupid, but not evil.
It perhaps explain.

Semi-legitimacy of corruption:

Corruption rests on the "mentality" of the people. – People believe that the boss has the right to live richer than others.

Analogy: Neanderthal and Collective intelligence:

there was no Genocide - the military factor, and even the factor of competition was not the main one.
- 50 thousand years ago, there were few people in Europe, and they fought mainly with the external environment, not with each other.
And even the factor of intelligence was not the main thing - in the struggle for survival in the environment.
- The sapiens survived on social instinct.
- Childbirth they were larger, and they were better able to solve problems – collectively. –
• Better organized corral hunting,
• Better organized storage of supplies.
• Better organised the manufacture of guns.
In particular, the sapiens were more developed speech, and altruism. -
"The unit of natural selection was not an individual, but a Genus.

by the Way, we owe a debt to the Neanderthal. -
- He cleared Europe of cats.

Now, in the 21st century, the question of the survival of mankind will again arise, and again the main factor will be – Collective intelligence.
Only instead of giving Birth are not the state, and Communities are unanimous people.
And instead of speech – Internet tools. For example, "Advisory structure".

States on the contrary, divide and stupefy people – "divide and rule", make them irresponsible consumers.

Democracy in the US is also far from ideal:

The American government also used propaganda in particular to fight against communism, and to protect their "sons of bitches". For example, slandered Che Guevara.

But at least it is an American democracy that does not threaten the existence of humanity.
And the Russian "Façade democracy" in danger.

 

 

Internal-political threats are becoming more prevalent than external-political ones.

Factors of peace in the 21st century:

1. The over-destructive nature of modern weapons.
2. Improving the accuracy of modeling and forecasting -
If the oligarchs of Germany knew that their assets would be subjected to nuclear destruction, it is unlikely to support Hitler.
3. Globalization and interdependence of rulers of different countries,
World wars of the 20th century were beneficial to oligarchs.
4. Democratization.
"Democracies don't fight." People don't need to kill and to die, in spite of all their instincts.

On the 2nd side,

 

"Collective cook":

of Course, a split cook is inferior to "professionals".
But the point of IT - in the possibility of creating "Collective cook", competition with which for the incompetent "professionals" out of the question.
More precisely, the meaning of "Collective cook" is not to replace top managers, but to eliminate the threat that will come from them after the 21st century.

What activists in the West don't understand:

1. The importance of threat "Managed democracy":

Ecology, animal protection and so on are of course important, but not as important as survival.
99% of environmentalists are not ready to commit suicide and kill their children and offspring for the prosperity of the remaining cockroaches on Earth.

2. Threats of maturing in the 2nd world:

freedom Fighters and even human rights activists do not have a full understanding of the political processes in the countries of the 2nd world and in their special services.
Propaganda directs their attention to their own problems.
And, even if they are interested in Russia and China, then – only external and formal signs, slipped them the same propaganda.
These formal signs are sufficient in their countries, but do not work in Russia.

Illusion of objectivity of history:

So far, all dictatorships have been unstable.
- In the 20th century, no Latin American dictatorship has lived more than 20 years.
This has created calm and false confidence that, for example, Russia will sooner or later democratize.
When activists in the middle of the 21st century realize their mistake, it may be too late.

Now it is more important to focus not on "isms", but on the survival of Civilization.
Anti-monopoly, "liberal socialism" - needed not for justice - now, but because they reduce the dangers associated with political monopolization.

Hidden threat:

the Main threat is the absence of a threat to ill-being - paradoxically.
Russia for the first time in the history of mankind will be able not to aggravate the internal political situation before the revolution from below and the fall of the regime.

On the 1st hand, for ordinary people it will be better. – The standard of living will be maintained at a minimum level of protest moods.
The authorities will creatively apply different methods - except the method of maintaining the standard of living.
For example, can simulate "Controlled revolution", - change of the ruler and the alleged ruling group.
An additional method is Terrorism - the intimidation of the people by inadequate repressions. –The punishment of a small number of people have fallen "Red line", mounted on a very low level.
The main method will be the development of "Mental propaganda", - management of mentality, culture of people - at a deep mental level - using IT (Information technology).

On the 2nd hand, one day people can lose not only a tolerable life, but also themselves as people, and - most people.

Analogy: Super volcano:

The longer magma accumulates, the more catastrophic the eruption.

automation of propaganda:

it is Already being used to clog the most primitive forums.
Then you can attach a "police" a psychologist to each person to create a quasi-reality to it.

Voluntary genetic medicine – to eliminate genetic defects will be late. – But it will complete the creation of a "sustainable" society.

Hidden threat:

at First, both ways of history - democratic and the way of "Managed democracy" - will be very similar in appearance.
Differences will become visible only in 100 years.
Next – the differences will start to grow faster.
And, if the democratic way leads humanity to immortality, the way "Mental totalitarianism" – to the rapid and terrible death.

What to do:

the Only way to avoid this scenario is parallel democratization. -
– Manage the people themselves their lives, including economic - with the help of IT (Information technology), too.
But this requires the creation of an appropriate social movement – "For the survival of mankind".

the artificial intelligence research Regime is like a nuclear weapon.

Sanctions against the whole country do more harm than good. – They only shift the blame on the United States for the decline in living standards.

Positive orientation:

it is Necessary to focus not on the struggle against someone or something, but on constructive creation.
The best "struggle" is the involvement of people in democratic processes, the maximum participation of people in solving social issues.
It is very important to create a tool for this like "Advisory structure".
This, at the same time, is the best method of dealing with all social problems.

Active information hiding:

I Reveal "maps", since certainly the FSB before all this has also thought of, but uses his favorite method of Active concealment of information - methods to the information did not pay attention.

"Prophecies":

I Write in the affirmative not because it is "prophecies", and for a clear statement of position - for search of adherents.

Security:

Is it possible to hide the statistics of page views or the like?

 

7653