Divine works


eng deu рус


Response letter Deliberative structure :

 

I am very sorry that I did not immediately answer your letter.

I'm in no hurry to expand the circle of communication, which can be qualified - fabricated as a "conspiracy ", "organization Intl unarodnoy group" :

I tend to err with the uncertainty in the matter is, safety .

 

1.  Personal Security :

I would be very grateful for the advice - how to safely expand the circle of communication on political issues.

a . Start with fame among human rights defenders? - Which ones?

b . Limit discussion, do not deal with organizational issues ?

c . Limit yourself to an abstract discussion, without relevant specifics?

d . Engage in producing it bezvizov th Venice-2.0 , including for personal emigration there ? (other emigration is difficult for me).

 

I do not want to play conspirators, and I am convinced that I am inclined to 100% transparency. Especially since FSB agents are everywhere.

That is, I am not inclined, for example, to crypto-correspondence, although this topic is interesting to me - just in case.

I’m interested in communication safety tips (links).

I am interested in the instructions of the FSB on the criteria for “custody” levels, which may concern me.

How to satisfy specially vague requirements of local laws during communication?

Is it possible to make impossible the statistics of the number of page views?

 

2. People:

I would be very grateful for letting me names of people who might be interested in my political and social proposals , or who can give advice s on issues , raised at the site .

Or for telling such people about me.

 

In particular, in one ( human rights s ?) It is advisable to ask their opinion about b optimal their behavior for personal safety and effective communication ?

 

3. " Deliberative structure":

Are there systems (sites) like the “ Consultative Structure e”, that is, with the interlocutors being blocked , censorship - only from below?

This can be a Social Network with Friends' circles for each participant , which , however , do not build up from scratch, but, on the contrary, the original Circle - the whole world.

 

Advisory circle of associates will be almost the same as that allow groups of e -minded conduct constructive discussion.

Yes, the fact that individual participants will communicate with each other only through intermediaries will reduce effectiveness, but not by much.

 

The word Advisory is used to emphasize the constructive orientation of Advisory Structure . - The purpose of the structure of this "structure" is not entertainment, but the solution of social problems , the joint creation and development of socially significant projects .

 

Comparative Advantage of the Deliberative framework:

Yes, disabling critics from below will be abused.

Yes, there will be few users who will be able to use it constructively.

 

But the question must be posed - about the "total" comparative benefit of such a system.

The mere benefit of the few users mentioned will be greater than that of the entire system - with censorship "from above", or without censorship in general - with complete freedom to the neighbor.

 

www.worldpolicy.org/journal/fall2011/innovation-starvation

 

4 . Hosting:

I would be very grateful to you for hosting advice and for moving the site http://www.dw2020.narod.ru/

 

It is desirable:

1. No ads,

2. the Free ,

3. The eternal .

 

5. Public domain:

We intend to lay out calculations on socially significant ideas.

But we want to , so that these ideas :

1. Will not be used - for military purposes,

2. Will not be - monopolized by anyone .

 

We would greatly appreciate advice - how to ensure this?

Which intern t- resources:

1. Allow free placement of content,

2. Do not remove it and,

3. Is it desirable to fix the date of publication?

 

 

3012

 

 

 

Crowd Psychology and Deliberative Structure :

Causes and symptoms :

99% of activists struggle not with causes, but with consequences, for example:

- They fight corruption, instead of creating a society that does not generate corruption.

- Go to environmental, etc. protests, instead of creating a democratic society in which protests are not needed, as people themselves will decide all issues.

- Protect human rights, instead of building a legal society.

 

Propaganda supports the limited thinking of people by taking the direction of their attention in the wrong direction.

Many analysts and politicians point to the root causes of problems and offer constructive solutions, but no one listens to them because of the "abstract", abstractness of their thoughts.

 

The idea of ​​the Consultative structure is - in such an organization of a dispute, discussion between people, including with the help of Artificial Intelligence - so that people themselves also come to effective = deep decisions.

 

Emotions and manipulations:

The purpose of the Consultative Structure is to counteract the manipulation of the psychology of the crowd by structuring the crowd.

Propaganda primarily uses the psychology of the crowd , its phenomena such as the pleasures of unity, the need for a common enemy, the need for common aspirations and a common leader.

The deliberative structure is a mechanism for grouping people on the basis of reason, not unconscious drives.

Since, unlike the emotions of the crowd, reasonable opinions are diverse, then the Consultative Structure is a way of connecting the intersections of sets of different opinions.

 

About yourself and the Deliberative structure:

Advocacy provokes a “culture of insults” in the Forums in order to destroy public dialogue.

 

I do not want to argue with those who argue for self-affirmation, out of pride.

I agree to argue only with those for whom it is more important - achieving a goal, solving a problem.

 

Losses from altercation exceed the truth that may be born - even if the proud debater is very efficient.

 

Solution: Moderation , grouping - below:

You can avoid the harm from competition, and at the same time get useful - practical arguments. -

- It is only necessary to exchange thoughts with a proud arguer not directly, but - through intermediaries.

 

 

1915

 

 

 

Scientific Method and Deliberative framework :

 

This is not about science, but about its social application.

 

 

In the age of the Internet are not optimal:

Monographs.

 

On the 1st hand - subject grinding,

On the 2nd hand - author's versatility.

 

 

One of the most important components of scientific work was

Difficulties in collecting information on literary sources.

 

More effective interaction, collectivity

More scientists