Penitentiary and Micro- communities :
Non-scientific penitentiary system:
A person is considered reasonable, responsible for his actions.
The offender is recognized either legally competent or not, sane or not, committed the act in a state of passion or not.
In fact, this gradation is non-discrete. -
Offenses fluctuate around 50%, less simply put. - People are sane, affective, capable by 49-51%.
The very use of the concepts of "sanity", "affect", "legal capacity" is non-scientific .
The mental process is highly dependent not only on social conditions, but also on circumstances. - In certain circumstances, temptations can work for a completely normal person. And criminal thoughts arise in 100% of people.
In prisons, not re-education takes place, but rather, the mutual re-education of criminals, only because of the increased concentration of criminals.
The penitentiary "science" is customized to the social order. “Legislators need to be scientific ,” scientists are trying to please them , to create the appearance of fraud and self-deception of voters.
Sentence:
Develop video suggestions:
1. For the citizens ,
2. For official s ,
3. For convicted x .
Engage in Internet Group :
- Development of programs , including aspects:
- social e ,
- production and cost- e ,
- standards Ativ s ,
- software , etc.
- Support and - assistance to convicts.
Grouped - not people, but - objects.
People are free to participate simultaneously in the development of various subjects.
- Bills .
- Contractual obligations.
"Osvobo REPRESENTATIONS " - in special . Settlements - under the Agreement.
Free choice of the Community and accomplices.
The convicts get acquainted with the video proposal individually, singly.
A person can NOT make conscious choices continuously,
but can make a conscious choice - singly - after deliberation.
Motivation:
People commit crimes because of a lack of positive motivation , in particular, the meaning of life .
Positive motivation:
Right now, the creation of specials is required . Micro-communities - for the survival of mankind.
Terms of the contract :
1 . Participation in social programs experiment s :
- Communities with different bubbled certain ideologues s and regulations, primarily - liberal,
- "Mars " is a project,
etc.
2 . Self-control of behavior - using remote psychos. Assistants .
3 . Location monitoring collar.
The monitors are not officials, but civilian assistants.
4. Responsibility:
In case of violation of the contract, the convicted person shall return to the place of detention.
5. Exemption :
Under the guarantee of specific citizens.
Program Example :
Participation in the development of incl . self-government - on a par with citizens,
Behavior is based on the value foundations of Sharia . But not social. device. - The political system of Sharia does not correspond to the tasks and society of the 21st century.
Remote selection of spouses - with the help of special. Software .
Free change of accomplices - with the help of specials. ON - according to the inclination of the soul .
Program Example :
Participation in humanitarian assistance. -
Delivery of goods to humanitarian disaster zones and evacuation of the population.
Micro-Community Location :
Option: At sea.
Option: On the islands .
Crime genetics :
Genetics is very weakly correlated with criminal behavior.
That is, eugenic obstruction of childbearing by criminals makes little sense in comparison with other factors.
Example: Australia:
Australia has a high proportion of descendant populations of exiles.
Legal theories are mostly unscientific :
They operate with the concepts of pre-scientific philosophies - ancient Roman and ancient Greek.
They are not based on evidence-based psychology and neurology as they should.
The reason for this - in a much m soc . order e for demagogy in the "legal sciences".
Natural sciences are much more objective than they are, since the military showed a demand for a physical result, not a socio-political one.
For example, it is assumed that a person acts thoughtfully and rationally, while in reality he acts on average - thoughtlessly and as a result of the work of emotions .
Punishment of the “criminal” after the investigation, trial, etc. like punishing an animal that is not able to answer for its actions, and serves only the purpose of intimidating other people - so that they have competing emotions in the process of committing a crime.
However , the communists are right:
1. It is more effective to reduce crime - changing "public emotions".
2. These changes in society in many ways contrary to the "classes th 'interests. -
Judges and "law enforcement" because of their cynicism, hypocrisy I and double standards - are the most conscious of the organizers of the crime.
True, the Communists make significant mistakes in the analysis of the "class" mechanisms of crime, and, especially in the recipes for its eradication.
4000
|