Divine works


eng deu рус


Ecologist , Climate , Greta:

 

I do n’t understand eco-activists either:

Yes, it will be hotter. But the climate will not lose stability.

- In the history of the Earth there were much greater cataclysms.

Harm to agriculture, etc.?

- Analog - Malthus.

- The development of technology will have time to fend off all the troubles it causes.

In past centuries, people's troubles were incomparably greater.

And climate is far from the main factor in the extinction of species today.

 

Greta’s Kremlin is even on hand. - The eco-movement will distract Western people from another, truly terrible threat - the highly probable death of Civilization.

There is no point in ecology without a human being.

In addition, the main factor in solving climate problems is also democracy:

1. People in the climate are more interested than rulers.

2. The main contaminants will remain “Guided Democracies”, which eco-activists will not affect.

3. The death of Civilization may be accompanied by the destruction of ecology as such, therefore, to save the ecology, the sustainability of the development of Civilization is necessary

 

Greta Tunber r

With "diverse interests", meaningless people miss the Civilization.

The hope is precisely on Aspergers in politics.

" We autistic people are more normal, and everyone else, on the contrary, is weird.

We do not know how to lie. We do not like to play the social games that you like so much.

I only speak when I consider it necessary. "

Compromise - from the spectrum of meanness.

I feel more respect than anyone.

 

Do not confuse sincerity and naivety .

Greta will not lose purity by becoming competent.

On the 2nd hand, the climate is a good accelerating platform.

In the middle of the 21st century, the hope is precisely for women, young people and Aspergers

Mankind was lucky that he had a protector and savior.

An initiative for anti-manipulative education on Fridays is also needed .

 

Greta's mother left work for the happiness of her daughter.

The Russian " gnawing rats " are latently abandoned - without exception, their parents satisfy only the instinct of pride.

 

Russian
people don’t understand the European soul: “Our man sees in this Greta first of all falsehood.
Envy, fear of new freedom and free thinking. A
feminist, teenager, and even with autism, skipping school ...
In Russia, the selfish Carlson is popular ...
If if I die, then let the whole planet die "
(Comment)

 

"The Russian intelligentsia came to the conclusion that that fool is psychic . " (A comment)

- The Russian intelligentsia consists of trolls and fools.

www.svoboda.org/a/30185225.html

 

 

1. The efficiency of the transformation chain : chem. energy above the "direct" ICE on average in Europe .

2. Chem. energy to the same 2030 will become 2-power.

 

Method for computing ( c ) primary troll sponsors:

Justification of the need to bankrupt specific corporations.

2019  www.svoboda.org/a/30309367.html

 

 

“Not in all climatic conditions, wind energy can be affordable and cost-effective”
( www.svoboda.org/a/29808535.html)

“This is a misrepresentation.” The climate factor is an order of magnitude less significant than the factor of political extremism.

 

Climate - a unique theme:

Usually, if there are activists, then among them there are sources of information .

Here are millions of activists and not one evidence.

About 5 years ago on Habr (the most qualified forum in RuNet ) we discussed the climate.

He asked for links to climate modeling - they did not.

Those models that are found - unanimously showed the absence of the threat, if any, except for sunstroke and t n easy pariruemye inconvenience .

There is a suspicion that " warming is, it would be necessary to invent" - as the next release valve " steam " .

 

Fact s that :

1. " Likhvin interglacial e - The climate at that time was much warmer than modern."

"Currently, the Earth is experiencing a peak temperature.

Perhaps it has already ended along with the medieval climatic optimum . "

(www. ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovich_ Cycles )

2 . The biosphere ate all its food - CO 2 .

Nearest nd it is natural th death is precisely - from of CO 2- hunger.

3 . Fortunately, h elovechestvu it and not threatened, that is to die just after 500 years - for another reason . -

4. The climatic threat is an order of magnitude ( ≈ 10 ^ 10) less than the threat of using manipulation AI.

5. After 5 years, the cost of solar panels and Na - ion will fall, and. if watered . Extremists do not interfere, the coal generation and ICE reduced and camping would naturally.

www.svoboda.org/a/30320574.html

 

 

Anxiety and fear are more useful than carelessness.

The problem is adequacy and reasonableness.

Why are they afraid of the climate?

Not wars, diseases, IT - political technology?

The latter , so an order of magnitude more dangerous than the climate. - People adapt faster than any natural changes.

Wars are familiar, but is climate change new?

But the change in wars exceeds climate change.

 

Valuable, however, are environmental activists themselves.

Valuable is not "Russian indifference." -

Making fear adequate is easier than resisting the cultivation of indifference.

It’s probably more correct not to reassure, but to give a comparative analysis of the threats.

The future is not defined - for people. Till.

 

Do not worry about resources:

" Oil " will never end. Just going up in price. This will refocus on renewable energy. - The growth of labor productivity is important. And he is coming.

Earth, in principle, can feed trillions of the population. - If only production will become cheaper. “In principle,” food today can be synthesized from coal, for example.

Therefore, the only thing to worry about is sustainability.

- That the nuclear conflict was extinguished in the bud, for example.

There will be sustainability - there will be both resources and adaptability to the climate.

 

The main instability is political.

If the Kremlin manages to degrade democracy in the West, then humanity will be doomed not to pass the "Great Filter" either.

The entertainment of this topic is more complicated than the film "The Day After Tomorrow", which is probably why it is not so popular.

It is necessary to make films not about after “tomorrow”, but about after 300 years - entertainment will appear there again.

Only films need realistic ones. - The contrived "The Day After Tomorrow", however, is more realistic than any existing film about the society of the future.

2020 www.svoboda.org/a/30479339.html