Divine works


eng deu рус


US , China - Comments My:

 

" China artificially lowers its currency ":

Not C underestimates, but the "arm of the market." - "Parasites" want to live, and give the Americans the "parasitic" part of the income, content with cheaper prices .

After all, "the Chinese will not be for the sake of pride complicate your life" , they are simply " a pragmatic s in the plan" too.

 

"Trying to hurt American farmers" :

The US administration is trying to hurt 10 times as many professions in China, taking advantage of the fact that "Chinese well-being depends on Western markets," taking advantage of the one-sidedness of its industries. After all, "they can not collapse the dollar," even.

 

In fact, more are parasitic - US corporations . - Mr. and unequal trade terms, taking advantage of the fact that "America has more trumps than China" , are parasitic on the rental of intellectual "property".

"The company had a choice - go there." -

Themselves moved production from the United States to China - out of greed, the payment for this shifted to their citizens, and responsibility - to the Chinese.

 

“ Tens of billions lost annually due to theft of intellectual property ”

The non-monopoly patent market would ultimately benefit the Americans themselves.

It would be better Blond directed his natural aggressiveness on the creation of the institute quench I bills - into the use of development , - to pay off the state -dolga USA.

Moreover, tracking their use is cheap today.

 

And in the USA, didn’t they “steal” technology in Great Britain at the beginning of the 19th century?

The suggestion that the unique physical means are identical to the invented intellectual "property" is propaganda.

 

"Another thing is that there were no guarantees":

The main guarantee of monopoly is the gunboat.

Beneficiaries of both sides can be , and benefit from a conservative policy.

However, American citizens only lose. “With 21st-century technologies, risks are not proportionate to their benefits.”

 

"The United States has enough economic, political, technological potential to ... prevail ":

As in a conventional war, both sides can lose.

More precisely, only the initiators will win.

 

"Compromise is constantly sought":

In the hope that so far "China has been a master of compromise"?

 

"If the credit bubble bursts"

"for the reason that the US protectionism strategy has changed ... signs of deflation."

"Trump, of course, is bluffing," but populists in the United States will be the main trigger for the collapse, which Americans will suffer as much as the Chinese irresponsible politicians.

After all, "countries are already so dependent on each other."

 

"Beijing subsidizes state-owned corporations ," " trade balance ":

On the 1st hand, Beijing is dumping .

But, on the 2nd hand, dumping at the expense of the Chinese as a whole.

The PRC is blamed not for dumping steel at the expense of aluminum, but for dumping the entire industry.

What prevents Americans from eating less Indians and ruining Chinese corporations with even greater “dumping”?

“To farmers ... subsidies will be made," too.

 

"Chinese firms got into huge debt" :

Does China need the USA? And who has more average debt per capita?

Yes, there are debts, but in one "pocket" at the expense of others, at the expense of the Chinese, and not external loans.

In general, this statement contradicts the previous one . " And the American public debt is more than a trillion dollars."

 

"Uneven income distribution."

But in the United States, asset ownership unevenness isn’t growing too?

 

"The Chinese skillfully manipulated naive Americans"

Americans skilfully manipulates comfort - in the US policy , who are studying at the Kremlin to find a scapegoat, to use patriotism and engage in demagoguery .

May be, head still knew - why his son flew to a meeting with the agents of the GRU?

- It is not necessary for someone to pay someone - with common interests in cooperation.

 

It is sad to see the bias and imitation of Kremlin propaganda on an objective in the rest of the resource .

It would be better to analyze the "New Model", which "created China." And the fact that its “novelty” lies in “old age”, in what the West went through in the 18th century.

It would be better to analyze the "Chinese soft power", then,

that "the tools are the same as the Russian authorities ",

that freedom in China is one-sided,

that authoritarianism hits, first of all, the Chinese themselves,

that the rise in the quality of life of the Chinese is limited by China’s domestic policy

what threatens the Americans is not the "parasitism" of the Chinese, but the political monopoly of the Chinese leadership, and partially the "native" corporations.

2019 www.svoboda.org/a/usa-today-china-trade-war/30102723.html

 

 

3773

 

 

 

USA-World - My Comments:

 

USA-Iran :

The conviction of Iran’s pressure on Europeans with explosions is unconvincing. - It’s more complicated, 3 countries are involved.

It is unconvincing that Trump is fighting the Iranian nuclear program by provoking it. - There are other goals.

Trump learns from the Kremlin to raise the rating with the help of war?

2019 www.svoboda.org/a/usa-today-iran-usa-drone/30014304.html