Divine works


eng deu рус

Idea of the Consultative structure:

the idea Of a Deliberative structure is the democratization of politics. -
"Democracy" should be democratic.
The idea of the Consultative structure is to reduce the monetary factor in politics.

Ukrainian oligarchy:

In the 1990s, parliamentary elections in Ukraine and Russia were quite democratic.
But they won the proteges of the oligarchs, as they paid for the election campaign – paid for the services of political technologists to deceive people, and watered advertising on television and on fences.
However, the oligarchs were also interested in an authoritarian, corrupt government, and held President Yanukovych and Putin.

IT, AI and democracy:

However, already in the 1990s there was the possibility of alternative history. -
The Internet has made it possible to reduce policy costs by orders of magnitude.
That's why in 1990 I proposed a "Deliberative structure" – as a form of "people's policy".

Political "Uberization":

Analogue: the Process of "Uberization" in the economy.
However, the development of "Uberization" lags far behind the possible even in the economy.
And this is not the merit of the FSB. – In Uberization and liberalization of intellectual "property" not interested and Western corporations.

However, in the West, even corporations are interested in the development of political Uberization and p2p-structures – in the 2nd world:
1. Growth in consumer sales market.
2. The increase in the reliability of investments in the 2nd world.
3. Reduced likelihood of loss of assets after the use of AI-singularity of the FSB for the manipulation of the Western electorate.

 

Idea of the Consultative structure:

- Increase the constructiveness of discussion through ethical grouping.

the Dispute is effective only among the unanimous, ie having common values.
Dispute the same without prior differentiation, for example in discussion Forums quickly degenerate into insults and ridicule that is above the tastes and positions.

Imposed thematic differentiation instead of ethical, t K:
1. To manipulate people so easily.
2. There are no mental profiles in science, - "Psychological profiles"are focused not on ethics, but on work. T e on needs not of the person, and on use of the person.

in this Case, unanimous people usually have a lot of topics to discuss.

Unanimous very much even have something to argue about:
1. 100% working mechanism "many goals are better".
2. Cleansing from propaganda influence.

 

Composition of the Deliberative structure:

- problems
- suggestions-solutions - options
the reason for them.

Justifications may also have justifications.

Suggestions can also cause problems.

The wood structure is obtained

For different problems m b one sentences

the Tree turns out to be intertwined

Sometimes it is possible to allow even "looping" –
Rationale 1 is a rationale 2, and
Justification 2 has justification 1 and
- for iterative solutions.

This whole structure is open to everyone.

 

People involved:

Problems of propositions and justifications are judgments.

Every judgment has an author

 

anyone can Make default judgments
But each participant can turn off the visibility of themselves for specific people and the visibility of specific people for themselves.
Each participant can:
- expose personal numerical estimates for different properties to other people and their judgments
- rankings of people and their judgments
- make alternative choices of people and their judgments

These estimates are used to calculate expert judgment weights, and
For human feedback.

Examples of people properties:
– politeness-rudeness,
– competence,
– constructability

 

2918

Idea of the Consultative structure:

is:
Collective improvement of ideas – at the level of ideas.

With the 1st hand, life has become more complicated compared to the 17th century. – "Simple" ideas are not viable, they require adaptation that can only be implemented collectively.
This adaptation is usually done – hierarchically.
Therefore, the advantage is not the quality of ideas, and the social position of the generator of ideas - chiefs, de-generals,

From the 2nd side – even if the idea of the chief was qualitative, there are always mistakes in it – because of complication of life (environment).
And these errors are not corrected – because of the hierarchical nature of the idea.
Usually errors are detected in the process of implementing new ideas.
However, as a rule, even the good idea is less developed-adapted to the old, the result is rejected "root".

One person today is not able to improve his idea at all before its implementation.
The patent mechanism, for example, is not effective. – viable are only extremely narrow ideas - instead of the invention of the steam machine – improving the spring of its valve.
As a result, socio-economic development is stagnating.

IT is the only industry where the ideas of singles are still being implemented.
But in IT the idea, for example, Zuckerberg is:
1. Not effective. – There are thousands of potential, much more effective, but not born ideas.
2. The implementation of even this ineffective idea remains far from perfect.

Any "fluctuations" ideas are extinguished - in the Bud. – The one who proposed the idea has thousands of critics - in the modern world.

the Idea of the Consultative structure is - the collective improvement of the idea – at the level of the idea:

1. Soul-search engine. -
There are unanimous people with the same desire, for which it is necessary to find a mechanism for its implementation.
That is, the generator of the idea is not a single person, but a group of non-random people, formally United only by the desire to earn money, and working only while the employer-boss is solvent.

2. 1-rank structure.
- Potentially it is more effective than hierarchical structure.
And since the group is unanimous, that is, all participants want to solve the problem, in such a group it is possible to realize the advantages of the 1-rank structure.

3. The idea is improved – at the level of the idea.
That is, the implementation of the idea is simulated – virtually, and the idea becomes competitive even before its implementation.
At the same time, many trillions of dollars are saved, because the role of ideas in the modern economy is very high.

 

2172