Divine works


eng deu рус

Anti-Censorship:

Idea: P2P sites:

I thought:
Mesh networks are not promising:
- The General public has no incentive to use them - the public "extremist" content is not needed - now.
- They are complicated and unreliable, a range of small gadgets,
- Probably intimidation - a Couple of users will go to jail - the rest will burst out laughing.

Satellite Internet is also in question:
- Long wait,
- Its already "headed" ROS-Space.
- The probable agreement of the Kremlin and Beijing with the business owners policy more money.

Then came the idea - P2P-sites!
+ They do not need radically new technologies - everything is done in the usual Internet.
Rummaged, - it turned out, that P2P-sites already have come up with.
Then it is not clear – why they did not hear it – had to specifically search for information about them.
Why the opposition does not enjoy such a great opportunity?

Idea: P2P search Engines:

I thought that despite the fall of the information "iron curtain", - banal concealment of information is still one of the most effective methods of propaganda.

the Problem is not so much the blocking of sites as the search Engines.
The problem is censorship of "free" Google and other popular search engines.
Google not only supports monopoly "intellectual property rights Holders", but also cooperates with authoritarian regimes.
As a result, people don't even know what to look for. – Do not know the authors, do not know about the existence of the most useful video presentations, articles, books.
People don't know how to look.

Then came the idea - P2P - search Engines!
+ They do not need radically new technologies - everything is done in the usual Internet.
Rummaged, - it turned out, that P2P - the search Engines already have come up with.
Then it is not clear – why they did not hear it – had to specifically search for information about them.
Why the opposition does not enjoy such a great opportunity?

YaCy

Idea: P2P-DNS:

I thought that, the main drawback of P2P sites is that they will take up a lot of disk space of active users.
The question arose - And if you distribute only links to ordinary sites, is there a possibility that these links could not be blocked? – And, found, - Proposal AlexSho "ZeroNet instead DNS":
https://habr.com/post/357548/
"get blocked resource — script podskazal list of mirrors and did a redirect to another site, but you turn .bit-address and him don't care will there kazino1 or kazino2.
The promise that we make non-blocking eroneously domain and not worried with the locks and don't catch the loss of traffic".

Anonymity – not important:

Much more important – possibility:
- Easy to get blocked by the counter-propaganda
- Easily find unanimous people,
- Block trolls – bottom,
- It's easy to Express will.

1. 90% of people in authoritarian countries only read, not write or do what requires anonymity.
In countries with a "Fictitious democracy" for reading forbidden literature is not jailed.
2. 99% of people in authoritarian countries, if they wrote, nothing "extremist" – violating even the blurred laws of authoritarian countries.

This is in the West, where there is almost no censorship, playing with anonymity.
In authoritarian countries - from the unity of anonymity with the absence of censorship - more harm:
1. This gives a strong argument to state propaganda.
2. This complicates the lack of censorship, because it is necessary to ensure anonymity at the same time.

Anonymity should be separated from the completeness of the search and the freedom to obtain information. -
- Anonymity is necessary, but – separately.

And, Men do not hide.

Race to death:

no Time to lose, -
Censorship is not the main problem.
The main thing is the development of IT-technologies of propaganda.
Another 20 years, and the use of P2P-sites and P2P-search Engines may be ineffective.

 

3124

 

Newspeak:

Oligarchy:

the New meaning is a political regime in which representatives of large capital influence the government.
It is implied – the independence of the rulers, which representatives of large capital are trying to influence.
The rulers of the same "successfully" reflect "arrivals" Khodorkovsky.

Actually:

the Ruling group is an oligarchy:

1. The government controls fixed assets,
2. The rulers and those close to him speak the whole branches "folk" of the economy – extractive industries, metallurgy.

Oligarchy

— a political regime in which power is concentrated in the hands of a relatively small group of citizens (for example, representatives of large monopolized capital) and rather serves their personal and group interests, rather than the interests of all citizens.
ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Олигархия

 

the

Counter:

Executioners who killed 1.1 million people – ordinary people – victims of propaganda:
https://mashable.com/2017/02/11/auschwitz-guards/#cyUDj6h0Nmqu

How to avoid military deaths?:

1 option: Counterpropaganda.
option 2: Death penalty for executioners.

- it is not effective.
Even for criminals, the penitentiary is less effective.