Divine works


eng deu рус

Scam "professionalism":

I am a supporter of professionalism in the sense of depth in the subject.
But I am an opponent of "professional" management.

it is Necessary to distinguish between professional study of management, and management.
"Professional" management is a threat today.
Dangers "professional" management surpass its advantages.
"Professional" management existed not because it is rational, but because of historical reasons, for example, because the cannibal king king MONOPOLIZED the media.

Control can and should be non-hierarchical, - with AI in particular.

Demagogy:

(Demagoguery is the deliberate misrepresentation for the purpose of manipulation).
When the average person tries to do the statement of work (Technical tasks), it is called "lover".
Demagogy is that:
1. He doesn't get paid for it.
According to one definition - "professionalism" – is a rewarding activity.
But the difference between management "activities" is that to get with her income, you need power.
2. There is no freedom of information, that is, the private is not available all the monopolized management information that different CIA provide "President" at his request.
3. There is no P2P-organization of analysis and management superior to the efficiency of the state organization.

AI threat:

the Existential threat of "professional" management is to use it AI - today.
It is possible to resist and compete with it only using democratic AI.

I:

Personally, I dropped the subject area, and do it is the issue of management.

My technical "Projects" can easily be called "projects".
Yes, in depth of research, they are inferior to the corrupt "professionals"-performers commanders-"kings".
But:
1. There is no other way for human survival,
2. Surpass "professional" traitors possible.

Help!:

I'm asking for help.

"Advisory structure":

the Idea of a & quot;Deliberative structure" – in an attempt to create such a self-governance structure.

Its specific implementation may be wrong. – Offer a more effective, most importantly – more competitive than hierarchical structures.

Internet factor:

"Experts" against the Internet:

there are no Experts In politics – there are propagandists – distorting facts to please those who actually pay them, even if they dispose of – allegedly "people's" money.

Without "experts":

the Idea behind the "Advisory structure" is that programs on the Internet, AI allow for collective expertise without "experts".

 

2151

Professionalism and dilettantism in politics:

 

let's Say I'm a football fan. - There is always a football expert – "professional" better than me.
Does that mean I can't be interested in football?
What is the criterion of class?
- Pleasure. – I am pleased to be interested in football. – That's enough.

no One has the right to decide for me what to do (not counting drugs, etc.).
Of course, I can offend someone by saying that I know more about football than him.
But it already other question, did not diminish my right of freedom of occupation.

Politics is a unique activity:

It is a game of people's interests.
1. Policy is simple:
a. It is simpler than any other science, because its development is hampered by the fact that it affects the interests of influential people.
b. It is not a science at all, but a moral and ethical choice.
Therefore:
2. A conscientious imbecile in it is more valuable than a political scientist "playing" to the detriment of people.
3. Politics is not just a hobby. – It is the duty of every honest person.
4. The existence of humanity depends on politics today. -
- That is, from whether you are engaged in it.

at the same Time today it is possible to create systems "collective intelligence", which can realize the factors of honesty and interest, and make the community "Amateurs" will be "more professional" any professional.
Especially since professionals-"politicians", are not really professionals in politics, but in propaganda and demagoguery.

 

1212