Divine works


eng deu рус


People's Council:

Questions:

Do you admit at least a small likelihood of a threat from the use of psychic AI? (see `` Introduction to the Problem '')
Given the importance of the issue, do you consider it necessary to publicly discuss this issue without relying entirely on the `` professionals ''? (see below About the professionals. Do you need a Public Deliberative Network? )

What to do ?:

Most important is your opinion on the issue - What to do?

Spreading the problem question:

If you admit the likelihood of a threat from the use of psychic AI, and find it useful to publicly discuss this problem, then do you agree to inform about it in your social networks?

What is the Deliberative Network ?:

One of the solutions we offer is the Deliberative Network.
The idea behind the Deliberative Network is to organize a people's council to answer the questions `` What to do ''?
At the same time, it is possible that the Deliberative Network could solve not only private, but also other problems.
The Deliberative Network (Network) in a broad sense is an Internet network similar to a social network, but with the goal of finding solutions to practical issues - primarily social ones.
Do you think that the first question should be the Deliberative Network form ?

P2P network:

Traditionally, contacts between activists are carried out through coordinators, media editors, etc. intermediaries who are often hired employees or even intelligence agents.
Even if a media editor is a volunteer bearer of the ideology of a given social group, he still has a concrete opinion, and a conflict of interests of pluralism and its opinion arises.
From the 2nd side, IT, AI dispatchers have appeared today, which can provide contacts more efficiently than a person with a fairly simple individual control, settings only by the users themselves.

About the professionals. Do you need a Public Deliberative Network ?:

2-3 years ago, I reviewed several thousand organizations, and found that no one in the world is dealing with the greatest threat to humanity in its history.
(For the threat, see: On the probabilistic approach to threats My.docx )
More precisely, there are several dozen government organizations and Think Tanks that formally have jurisdiction over this threat.
However, all these organizations are engaged in related areas, but none of the most threatening ones.
In addition, due to a conflict of interest, this threat should be dealt with primarily by NGOs NPOs.
However, no public organization in the world deals with this threat.
The fundamental difference between public interests is that the more professional the specialist who deals with them, the more harm instead of benefit he can do.

Why do you need the Network:

1. Existential Threat:

Improvement of IT technologies for manipulating voters is accelerating.
It is possible that people completely lose their influence on the decisions on which their lives depend.
People can become just a burden, rapidly degrade, and, after a few hundred years, disappear as such.

Aspect 2: The need to find optimal solutions:

There are many solutions that are simply unknown to those who are faced with some problems.
People who face problems in their lives simply do not know that solutions to their problems have already been found in other countries.

People can solve many issues on their own without overloading the authorities.

Solving issues with the help of the Leader (President) is optimal under the conditions:
1. The tribe has 400 people, not 400 million.
2. The economy of the tribe is 1 stream and 10 palms, not the most complicated economic system in history.
3. The weapon of the tribe is 40 clubs. But even so, it is advisable that the decisions about war and peace are not made by the leader alone, since the life of the entire tribe depends on him (especially if the `` leader '' is a half-crazy Trump with a nuclear button from the deadliest weapon in history).

Aspect 3: The need for a new internet service:

There are online "Answer" services where people ask questions and then pick the best ones.
However, the most important issues are non-trivial and controversial, do not have a simple generally accepted solution, and require structured discussions.

There are social networks in which people set out their positions and meet like-minded people.
However, social networks are not focused on developing optimal solutions with the participation of people with different opinions.
In addition, in existing - centralized social networks there is always a risk of deleting accounts by moderators.

There is Wikipedia where people cite authoritative sources.
However, Wikipedia is focused on presenting the opinions of authorities, including on social issues, on informing them, and not on finding answers to such questions.

Other benefits that the Deliberative Network would have:

+ Increased education of people on social issues, less susceptibility to the influence of demagoguery and populism.

& nbsp;

The purpose of the Deliberative Network is not just a discussion, but an expression of will.
The word " Deliberation " better reflects the meaning.

Counter-propaganda is a function of the Deliberative Network:

One of the main methods of propaganda is processing a sucker alone.
At the same time, the team of propagandists will always be stronger, as they develop a psychological scenario for the treatment.
The Deliberative Network is a collective response to all possible propaganda arguments, backed by ratings.

What form would you suggest Deliberative Network form ?

Option: P2P (decentralized) internet network in which participants can:
- Formulate questions,
- Offer parallel options.
- Freely group, - choose your interlocutors - by exclusion.
- Attach to your answers - arguments and links to research and statistics. data.

- Rank:

- questions,
- the wording of the questions,
- answers - according to different criteria.
- other participants - according to different criteria.

DAI and Deliberative Network:

DAI (Distributed Artificial Intelligence) can be a machine component - a non-hierarchical control system. see: DAI vs AI painting.docx < / a>
The human component could be the Deliberative Network.

No AI participants:
- have a fight,
- will take care of cats,
- will do pornography.

Using analogs:

The number of software (Software), which in various aspects meets the tasks mentioned here, is growing by the shaft.
What Apps can you offer?
Is it possible to take them as a basis and refine them?

What strategy would you suggest for creating a Meeting Network?

How to create a Network?
Option: Chain Reaction. - Interested people send offers to their friends, who may also be interested.
Where can I find the addresses of suitable activists?

- Your suggestion ?:

& nbsp;

What is more important - brevity, accessibility of formulating the need for the Network, or a strategy for its expansion?

On the first hand, we must not narrow down the problem of the Web, but
On the second hand, it is necessary to formulate not abstractly, but to show the need for the Network - for solving specific problems.

Cooperation with peers:

" Bicycle " invented long ago. - There are many research centers and initiatives on this topic in the West.
Examples:
Consortium Catalyst Organizations Abstract.docx , < a href = "file:///MEETING% 20 STRUCTURE \ FSO% 20Methods% 20Solutions \ Catalyst% 20Konspekt.docx"> Catalyst Abstract.docx
Center for Collective Intelligence MIT Abstract.docx / a>

The problem is:
1. for the survival of Civilization - the tools of the collective mind are extremely necessary in authoritarian countries, and not so much in the West, but it is there that they are completely unknown.
2. Academic institutions have absolutely no interest in the aspect of the Collective Intelligence - for the survival of humanity.
(See, for example: https://cci.mit.edu/about/ )
Academic institutions generally do not engage in active politics of the population of authoritarian countries.

Accordingly, it is necessary to establish cooperation with these movements in the West, but the official bodies of authoritarian states should be excluded from this cooperation. - What is your opinion?