Liberalization of the means of production:
is an increase in economic freedom by restricting monopoly property rights that infringe on the economic freedom of other people.
This is a prohibition to deny.
There are two ways to reduce economic polarization:
- Total bans (Communism),
- Increase in economic freedom, competition and legal social responsibility.
In economic freedom, `` Social surplus value '' disappears too.
Today, the weight of the contradiction between liberalism and limited resources (land, oil) is naturally decreasing - with the development of technologies - with an increase in yield by an order of magnitude faster than population growth (`` Agro-machines ''), and cheaper alternative energy sources (Solar panels) .
Paradoxically, due to the factor of trade protectionism, agro-production is profitable even at sea, for example, the Adriatic - today.
Property Relativity:
Ownership cannot be absolute.
Pictures:
If I own a women's bath, then I have the right to walk on my property without warning (A true story taken from the newspaper).
If I own a Profitable House, there will always be tenants who do not demand responsibility from me. My house - I want it - I will bring it down on the heads of the residents.
If I own a cat, then I have no right to roast it alive in the microwave.
If I own a painting by Leonardo da Vinci, then I have no right to burn it for courage.
"If you have a business, you did not create it, society created it" (Barack Obama)
Copyright liberalization:
The main direction of the liberalization of the means of production is the liberalization of the contrived Intellectual "property" - today.
- I cannot prohibit the use of my invention.
- Economic legislation should prescribe the procedures affecting compensation for inventors, excluding the concept of `` Copyright owner '' as a rentier intermediary.
Until now, conflicts between corporations and dependent inventors are resolved at the expense of the consumer.
Today's antitrust regulation Intellectual property incomparably more important than land regulation:
1. Intensification of agro-production has made land resources not in short supply.
2. The weight of agricultural production has dropped significantly.
At the same time, today, antitrust regulation should NOT be restrictive and state-owned.
Benefits of using development fees:
It would strengthen independent development at the expense of corporate, while solving the problem of `` Patent submarines '',
And that would have a beneficial effect on democracy.
She would make the development more open,
This would accelerate technological development.
Liberalization of the physical means of production:
AI tools are ahead to help find, rent and share equipment.
That is, the legal liberalization of the physical means of production is secondary, the legislation should be adjusted to the capabilities of these AI-tools, but to do it proactively, ahead of time.
Moreover, the institution of usufruct and easement - the use of other people's robots - is not an invented utopia, but has been tested for millennia, in contrast to the new private property rights.
The purpose of the institution of private property is to protect against the power of the king, and not to gain the privileges of the power of the king.
No one can prohibit the use of a harbor-port, a railway, a gold mine, and even socially created equipment of the plant.
- Economic legislation should prescribe, in particular, `` tender '' procedures affecting rental pricing.
& nbsp;
Anti-authoritarian socialism and liberalism:
Anti-authoritarian socialism does not contradict liberalism, but rather is the development of true liberalism.
Quasi-Patent - Project:
Idea:
Creation of a parallel institute of simplified patent law, built on the principles of not rent, but payment for use without permission.
See: Antimonopoly Initiative.docx
Targets:
1. De-monopolization of the institution of patenting.
2. Reducing the cost of copyright registration.
Rise in the cost of Intellectual Property becomes the main factor in the slowdown in the reduction of costs, and economic growth in the `` developing countries ''.
|