Divine works


eng deu рус


#Facebook - terrorists assistant?

Facebook saves on communication with users, has disabled feedback.
Terrorists use Facebook's connivance - they easily block their opponents. - Authoritarian organizations have advantages in destructive activities.
Terrorists use Facebook's connivance - they easily block their opponents, since authoritarian organizations have advantages in destructive activities.

Here's an interesting experience:
Our 4 facebook accounts were blocked in 1 week in 04/2020.
Moreover, I created accounts for willing people who did not have an account, including from different IPs.
But all of them were blocked after their creation.

It's funny, but before that I hadn't done anything on Facebook at all, didn't violate anything, and couldn't violate.
Probably, I was blocked on the complaint of the RF-troll - for my comments on Svoboda.org (?)

I stopped commenting on Svoboda.org, and my 5th Facebook account, created a month later, remained unblocked even after I used it to post a few articles.
Perhaps the "curator" put a "tick" on me, and my comments on Svoboda.org - according to his instructions - are a bigger irritant than an account with a small number of "friends" (?)

I didn't risk texting on Facebook, and only used it for posting.
But then I decided that Facebook is valuable, precisely as a means of gathering unanimous people (?)
For half a year, I completely stopped being active on Facebook, in order to then conduct only completely secure correspondence there, and send articles to interested people by e-mail (?)

The 2nd option is to post on Facebook links to articles that are on my site. Do you think it is just as safe?
Do still need to use Facebook, because it is very popular and has a fairly convenient functionality?
Is it right to sacrifice comments on Svoboda.org for the more important goal of gathering an organization that could contend with authoritarian organizations?

Please advise - how can you gather a group of not indifferent people on the Internet?

- Other social networks - which one?
- Google-Groups?
- DGroups?
- Livejournal.com, etc.?
- Youtube, etc.?
- Chat - which one?
- Internet forum - which one? I, an anti-extremist, have been banned from >50 western web forums.
- Conference call?
- Mailing lists with comments?
- Newsgroups?
- IRC channels?

If you are interested, you can send an empty letter to my e-mail - I will send you texts for which I may have been blocked.
My theme is #HumanLivesMatter - the main threat to humanity is the use of psychic AI.

Which countries are hosting more reliable? - Since 2007, my hosting accounts have been deleted several times, same in violation of Agreements of hoster. - Perhaps, according to the complaint of the organizers of the terrorist attack in Andijan in 2005, where 1000 people were killed, and who received only promotions for this?
Black Lives Matter must denounce their non-self-defense violence in Portland in 2020.

Trying to force Facebook administrators to delve deeper into the "terrorist wars" that are waged in it?
- Organize a company # Facebook_Terrorist_Amate? - Is brand important for Facebook?

In order not to tease the RF-"bots", I shouldn't do anything before I find people?
Probably, RF-curators are still working with ordinary users - according to standard instructions, and not individually, so the fact that I am disclosing my plans here should not affect their implementation?
Please reply - to my e-mail, not Facebook - to reduce my visibility.
Your answer is also important in case my 5th Facebook account will be blocked too (?)
My e-mail:
e654467@gmail.com

Facebook is valuable because there are many Facebook activist contacts.
Also on the activist's Facebook page, you can see the chains of his like-minded friends.
however, posting to Facebook contacts is only possible from Facebook.
Activists very rarely indicate their other contacts on their Facebook page.
To be able to write messages to activists, I want to keep my Facebook account.
After all, Facebook requires that the account belongs to a real person and is the only one with him.
At the same time, if the account is blocked, Facebook does not enter into correspondence.
The troll completed the task - I drastically reduced my activity - precisely for fear of losing the unique opportunity to communicate on Facebook.

To the TV channel `` Present Time '' (www.CurrentTime.tv) - Open letter:

§ Streaming video - You have a sabotage model,

or do I understand something?
It is inconvenient for people in the regions, if not unrealistic, to receive your streaming video, which will also be blocked.
1. Retro is inappropriate here. - It is more convenient for people not to wait passively, as in 1921, for a radio program according to the program, but, as in YouTube, just select it from the list (or by voice search) and listen right there.
2. It is more beneficial for people in target regions (and for American taxpayers) that you provide the Russians with a free convenient VPN (or the like) than all of your content put together.

§ & quot; Usage & quot; affected:

You write about the persecuted Muranova (www.currenttime.tv/a/kareliya-delo/31163734.html)
- as in Soviet propaganda - without giving direct links and contacts.
It seems that you are just using Muranova.
The journalist-interviewer Muranova should ask her first question - `` Is it possible to give information about you ''. - Muranova is interested in the fact that caring people could help her - they could find out the details of the advocacy of her case, donate account.
Special services and so everyone knows about her,

§ Entertainment nature of the programs:

American taxpayers will again think that you are taking them for fools.
- The Russians are not watching you for fun - Your competitors are not a strip show, but `` Palace for Putin '' Navalny.
Your strength lies in openness. - What you are trying to lure, like a bad advertisement for an unnecessary gadget, causes only distrust. Your audience is not in open conditions like the Russian-Today audience. It seems that Solovyov is smarter than you.
Your strength lies in constructiveness - which is what Navalny lacks. - Navalny gives the impression that he is fighting only for the place of the tsar, and not for a safe Russia.
Your project must be effective and efficient. Isn't it?

You must:
1. Explain to Russians the scientifically grounded relationship between their quality of life and the political system that was imposed on them.
2. Offer the Russians a scientifically based alternative political system, given that they are already `` burned out '' on 'democracy' in the 1990s. By the way, the State Department and the US Defense Ministry are most to blame for the revanchist sentiments of the Russians. The goal of the latter was to remove the communists by giving power to the thieves.
3. Offer the Russians a scientifically grounded Roadmap with minimal costs - terrorists hold 300 million Americans hostage and will naturally bluff.

§ What to do:

A full-scale psychic war is being waged against the United States.
If you carry out a comparative analysis, it turns out that today they are not optimal, not profitable:
1. Budget spending on conventional weapons, on floating coffins (aircraft carriers);
2. Sanctions, and even
3. Protection from terrorists.
Counterpropaganda is the most effective today.
Moreover - not a lie in response to a lie, but exposing manipulations and constructive suggestions.

In authoritarian states, there is a large latent unemployment and political apathy is cultivated. - People are forced to work as trolls.
Optimally, the most profitable is not to create an `` anti-troll factory '' - in the United States, and create a `` foreign legion '' outnumbering the `` factory of lies. ''
Then there will be no terrorists attacking the United States.
Your TV channel is almost useless now. Personally, my views were formed long before the appearance of your TV channel.
Residents of authoritarian states know their friends better than experts in the United States.
In addition, in authoritarian states you can find 1000 times more volunteers, 1000 times cheaper than experts in the United States.

§ US Censorship:

Why was I banned from 27 out of 30 Internet forums in the United States, where I only posted anti-extremist posts, trying to do your work for free? I don't want to buy sim cards and change accounts like a troll.
Is counterpropaganda censored under the pretext of blocking propaganda? Unlike me, Kremlin bots in the US, by the way, continue to operate.
It is hard to believe that your truth is less competitive than the lies of the trolls, and that you are not able to expose them and answer them - openly.
Break Russian-Today statements into parts and parry each one separately. Spectators will be interested in this sport.
Yes, censorship is private, but it means that democratic expert mechanisms have not been built.
Thus, you are agitating Americans for communist regulation - from above.

I'm not an extremist:

I was banned from 10 out of 10 forums in Ukraine, although I spoke exclusively from a pro-Ukrainian position.
I was banned from all forums in the USA.
I was banned from Radio Liberty and even on Facebook.

At the same time, you will not find in me not only a single insult to anyone, not only terrorist calls, but even `` extremist. ''
On the contrary, I speak out against age-old terrorism and state extremism.
But at the same time, I do not urge to fight against anyone.
Instead, I just propose to constructively build your own life, your own communities.
I only call for the love and salvation of mankind ..