Divine works


eng deu рус


Allied Billionaires - Hypothesis:

The wealthiest 'capitalists' can be potential allies in the survival of Civilization.

The Capitalist Paradox:

Modernity is also distinguished by the `` division of political labor. ''
The billionaire investor does not build - directly the political system, does not bear direct responsibility for it - unlike authoritarian rulers, and even oligarchs.

A billionaire investor in a democratic country is a beneficiary who simply picks up wealth that accidentally fell into his hands.
`` Parasitize '' not so much billionaires as politicians - on billions concentrated by billionaires.

A study of the distribution of billionaires' spending on political lobbying would be very useful.
There may well be paradoxical spending to the detriment of one's `` class. ''

Moral diversity within the 'class' there are hundreds of times more billionaires than the difference between the average worker and the average billionaire, and so is the diversity among workers.
That is, if we consider moral responsibility, then it would be more adequate to operate not with `` classes in relation to the means of production '', but with psycho-groups.

In democratic countries, "capitalists" increase their capital - economically, not through violence and propaganda like authoritarian rulers.
In the conditions of functioning democratic institutions and civil society, billionaires do not dispose of not only the means of violence and propaganda, but even simple political means - like their counterparts in non-democratic states.
Public control is necessary mainly at the stage not of creation, but of the use of capital.

"Caesar is Caesar's, and God is God's":

The meaning of democracy lies precisely in the separation of political power from wealth.
However, today, in order to survive, it is necessary to continue to move further - in the direction of reducing the political power itself.

Stop natural selection:

Natural selection has been the engine of the evolution of life and intelligent life on Earth throughout their history, from inception.
But today, social natural selection must be stopped for this intelligent life to survive.
Intelligent life on Earth has become too powerful, it is capable of destroying itself if the `` anarchic '' continues competition.
In traditional competition, the most power-hungry, greedy, unceremonious, unprincipled and hypocritical money-gamblers win.

Capitalists not dangerous:

Billionaires and investors are not subject to natural selection, unlike authoritarian politicians and even hierarchical top managers of corporations.
Billionaires are not interested in propaganda and manipulation. - They are not interested in any populist politician setting them on the crowd.
Billionaires are interested in 'moral,' divine ' dictatorship '', roughly speaking, they are interested in democracy.
That is, this Hypothesis is non-Marxist.

Billionaires are not against the growth of the welfare of ordinary workers. -
Billionaires compete with each other, with classmates, not with their employees.
But even this rivalry is a show-off rivalry, not a rivalry for survival.

The richest capitalists will not mind if, for example, the profits of all the `` capitalists '' decrease the same - due to the decline in the monopoly of economic conditions.
Billionaires became such, as they sought not absolute, but relative wealth.
The monopoly of economic conditions is more convenient not for them, but for politicians.
Satisfied workers are also more difficult to set against capitalists.

However, in order to interest billionaires, you must first create a workable organization that can prevent the mechanization of the manipulation of people.

Freedom + Transparency:

On the first hand, money is dangerous in itself - Money is power.
On the other hand, it is dangerous to push billionaires into the camp of power fighters.
Moreover, economic equality is simply unrealistic.

Probably optimal - maximizing transparency of cash flows while curbing:
On the 1st hand, attempts to use money opaquely,
On the other hand, attempts to restrict the freedom to manage money.
90% are 'capitalists' support security measures against the use of money for mental manipulation.
Billionaires understand that if they do not take the initiative themselves, it will cause the mood to play it safe and deprive them of the freedom to manage their money