Divine works


eng deu рус


Less is Better:

It seems more appropriate to first discuss a strategy for gathering participants.
2-3 people are enough for this.

It seems that the tactic of iterations is more expedient:
At the 1st iteration - with 2-3 people:
1. Discuss - how to find 10 more interested persons
2. Improve the solution to the problem (survival).
On the 2nd iteration - with 10 people - clarify the same, etc.

Do you need fun stuff?

If you post the Ark of Freedom on your Facebook page - jokes and films, then a frivolous audience will gather on it.
If we attract with amusement, then those who are looking for amusement, and do not want to hiccup for solutions, responded.
Whom we invite, they will gather.

I hope not to re-educate anyone, but to search with the help of modern IT - a few, but ready-made unanimous people who are ready to work seriously.
There may be many frivolous people, but they will have to be re-educated.
Therefore, jokes should be presented precisely as secondary illustrations.

Opinion:

Fun is not a hindrance to business. - The main thing is the desire to delve into.
and if they do, they will seriously work.

The problem of finding unanimous. Letter:

I have been thinking for a long time about starting a channel on www.youtube.com or the like.
But first I decided to try a different way - to find more or less unanimous people, start with a discussion with them, and gradually and in parallel to build and expand & nbsp; " Deliberative Network " - because:
1. Going in a different direction - I may have mistakes and do not want to start by creating a public bias about myself as being delusional.
2. Already aroused the interest of the S.services. I do not want to pointlessly ask for trouble. The Meaning of the Deliberative Network - in the use of IT opportunities, in that it is flat, horizontal, anarchic - it does not have a guide and a list of participants.
Yes, 99.9% of people are not ready to discuss, especially in a uniform Russia.
The idea and the difficulty is to find 0.1%.

What did you do ?:
1. Collected & gt; 1000 E-addresses of close NGOs, etc. I did mailings.
Almost no one answered. And he did not find out the reason - why they do not answer. Perhaps because NGOs tend to hire few interested staff for correspondence.
The idea is not to delve into a specific theory at once, but to differentially seek points of contact with different activists.
Prepared mailing lists for - different directions - anarchists, ecologists, etc.
2. I posted invitations to the Forums. - Cautious in the sense - refined from delusion. They are also on www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100052483266734
If one of the writers provides an opportunity to respond to him, then a queue of those who also want to communicate is lined up for him.
In addition, I was banned from almost all ≈50 Forums where I wrote, in violation of their own `` Agreements ''. They even blocked them on Facebook, although I didn't have time to write a word there at all. The specified Facebook account is the 4th or 5th.

Ie The first question is not to discuss the theory, but to discuss the strategy of finding unanimous.
How to find the addresses of activists from their 'political resumes' and not NGOs?

Participant gathering strategy:

I asked for advice - how to gather participants? - I never consulted with anyone and, perhaps, did the wrong thing.
How to ask - How to ask? - Am I right in thinking that we should ask people about - How to ask people - how to gather participants?

I got used to independently study articles for example - "How to gather like-minded people using Facebook"
But:
1. Lots of off-topic advice at all,
For example, Articles " How to Promote Posts on Facebook? " - focused on sales.
2. The Soviets are not guided by our problem and like-minded people. - Our problem is generally exotic.

I want to stop acting as a gag and try to do what other people suggest. For example, Valya advises to be promoted in social networks.
At the same time, one must learn to cooperate.
They misunderstood me: Instead of offering, Valya started just doing my gag.

Announcements:

" Sensational " phrases like `` kill humanity '', `` throw Valya '' attract attention but repel at the same time.
Maybe not to use such phrases without accompanying them with explanations - right there, instead of expecting that the reader will have a desire to read to the end in order to understand the paradoxes?

Clarifications of the proposal to use Facebook:

On Facebook - publish only announcements with links to articles on specials. site?

& nbsp;

Errors when posting to Facebook:

Facebook is a social network, not a blog.

The purpose of the post is to encourage readers to do one of the following:
- like,
- share,
- comment
- follow the link.

It is better to split a long post into several parts with a photo
& gt; 1 link should not be in 1 post.

Ask subscribers for likes and shares only if you offer something in return.

Mistake # 4: Ignoring negative comments
https://texterra.ru/blog/6-tipichnykh-oshibok-pri-publikatsii-postov-v-feysbuke-i-sposoby-ikh-ustraneniya.html