Divine works


eng deu рус


People's Court - Draft:

Proposal: Create a new public institution - & quot; Civil Court & quot;

Disadvantages of the state judicial system:

1. Darling;
2. Long;
3. Corruption-unstable.
There are no independent state courts, and there cannot be.
There are only relatively independent courts.
a. In the USA, judges also have material interests and personal preferences.
b. 100% unambiguous laws are impossible.
The first function of the court is to interpret laws in relation to specific cases.

I propose to create first:

& quot; Divine & quot; court:

1. Moral.
That is, his decisions have no immediate physical consequences.
With the norms chosen by the participants themselves, the Civil Court will be closer not to the judiciary, but to the 4th - the media of `` authorities '', as well as to the `` courts of honor '', and differ from the latter - by a developed mechanism.
The 21st century has seen an increase in the political significance of public opinion. And that's good for the survival of Civilization.

2. Free, `` volunteer. ''
That is, the work of its participants is not paid in connection with the activities associated with this judicial system.
Free members will be incorruptible in principle.

3. 100% open, transparent.

The word "divine" here it has nothing to do with religion and, moreover, with religious organizations. It only reflects the immateriality and purity of thoughts.
Although it is possible to use the principles of `` spiritual '' exercises.

Civil Court:

1. The civil court will be truly independent from the state, since its decisions will not be related to the state. organs.
On the 2nd side of the Divine solution the courts will only be moral.
That is, decisions will not be able to be implemented with the help of state organs of violence.
Although it is possible to cooperate with:
1.1. With the existing courts of law in democracies, for example, to speed up trials, reduce costs and improve their quality.
1.2. Flat net micro-cruise-missals

3. There will be no procedural judges.
Their functions will be performed by the participants in a flat system like the Meeting Network, using DAI (Distributed Artificial Intelligence).
State certificates for participants will not be required. They will be replaced by a flat system of mutual rating.
Like the Advisory Network The civil court will be competitive.
Procedural Rules

Participation in the proposed system will be a good and beneficial practice for law students and aspiring lawyers.

2. The judges making all decisions will only be the `` jury '' - ordinary citizens.
Jury will be selected by the DAI system, that is, really impartially, based on the General Rules.
All jury decisions must justify based on `` divine '' laws .

Functions DAI :

1. Reduced labor costs,
2. Information advisor. - "Unprofessional" the participant will be able to work with high competence.
3. Formation of effective groups of participants. Interaction of groups.
4. Rating of participants, etc.
5. Objectification = reduction of subjectivity.

Rules :

In particular, its Rules will be subdivided into:
- Universal and
- Competitive.
Competitive rules will be chosen by the participants themselves. That is, they will not be mandatory for all participants.
They will be generated by freely self-formed open groups of contributors.

& quot; Laws & quot ;:

For a start, already existing norms, selected by the participants, can be used as laws, for example, the `` Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Freedoms. ''
In the future, the Advisory Network can make its own laws.